ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02008721

Progression Rate of MSA Under EGCG Supplementation as Anti-Aggregation-Approach

NCT02008721, Phase 3, Completed, Dr. Johannes Levin; results first posted 2024-03-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Progression Rate of MSA Under EGCG Supplementation as Anti-Aggregation-Approach. Trials, record NCT02008721. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02008721

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Progression Rate of MSA Under EGCG Supplementation as Anti-Aggregation-Approach
NCT number
NCT02008721
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
92 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Dr. Johannes Levin
Conditions
Multiple System Atrophy
Interventions
EGCG as putative neuroprotective agent, Placebo
First posted
2013-12-11
Last updated
2024-03-12
Results first posted
2024-03-12
Limitations and caveats
The PROMESA trial had several limitations. The trial was powered to detect a 50% reduction in disease progression, not to detect smaller changes.~Furthermore, the assummed dropout rate was 20% while the observed drop out rate was approximately 27%. Furthermore, center size was heterogeneous, only four of the 12 centres recruited ten or more patients.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange of Score in Motor Examination (ME) of the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS-ME) From V1 to V7.52 weeks
To assess the efficacy of EGCG vs. Placebo to reduce the progression in the motor examination (ME) of the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS-ME) from V1 to V7. The UMSARS-ME (Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale, Motor examination) assesses 14 operationalised signs of multiple system atrophy. 25 Scores for all 14 items range from 0 to 4, thus total scores range from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
SecondaryPossible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the Change in the UMSARS - ME in the Wash-out Phase (From V6-V7)4 weeks
To assess any effect of EGCG vs. Placebo on the evolution of the above mentioned parameters during the wash-out phase (from V6-V7) measured by the UMSARS - ME. The UMSARS-ME (Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale, Motor examination) assesses 14 operationalised signs of multiple system atrophy. 25 Scores for all 14 items range from 0 to 4, thus total scores range from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
SecondaryChange in the UMSARS Total Score From V1 to V752 weeks
To assess the efficacy of EGCG vs. Placebo to reduce the progression from V1 to V7 in UMSARS total score The total score of the UMSARS (Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale) is a disease specific rating scale that comprises the activities of daily living subscale and the motor examination subscale. The activities of daily living subscale assesses motor symptoms and autonomic symptoms (items 1-12 of the UMSARS activities of daily living subscale) with scores from 0-4 for every item, resulting in a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 48. A higher score means a worse outcome. It also includes the 14 items of the UMSARS motor examination subscale with possible scores from 0-4 for every item, resulting in a score range from 0-56. The UMSARS total score hence shows a range from 0 to 104. Higher scores indicate a greater impairment.
SecondaryPossible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the UMSARS Total Score From V6 to V7 (During the Washout Phase)4 weeks
To assess any effect of EGCG vs. Placebo on the UMSARS total score during the wash-out phase (from V6 to V7) to explore possible symptomatic effects. The total score of the UMSARS (Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale) is a disease specific rating scale that comprises the activities of daily living subscale and the motor examination subscale. The activities of daily living subscale assesses motor symptoms and autonomic symptoms (items 1-12 of the UMSARS activities of daily living subscale) with scores from 0-4 for every item, resulting in a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 48. A higher score means a worse outcome. It also includes the 14 items of the UMSARS motor examination subscale with possible scores from 0-4 for every item, resulting in a score range from 0-56. The UMSARS total score hence shows a range from 0 to 104, a higher score indicates greater impairment.
SecondaryPercentage of Striatal Volume Loss in MRI (3D MP-RAGE MRI Volumetry, 3D FLAIR) From Baseline to V7 as Effect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo)baseline to 52 weeksTo assess the efficacy of EGCG vs. Placebo to reduce the progression from V1 to V7 (52 weeks) in striatal volume loss measured by MRI (3D MP-RAGE MRI volumetry, 3D FLAIR)
SecondaryClinical Safety and Tolerability of EGCG Measured by Death Rates52 weeksClinical safety and tolerability of EGCG measured by number of deaths in EGCG- Group vs Placebo-Group
SecondaryEffect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo) on Safety and Tolerability: Discontinuation Rates Because of Hepatotoxicity52 weeks
Effect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo) on Safety and Tolerability: Measured by Discontinuation rates because of hepatotoxicity (measured by increased aminotransferase concentrations)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving Each Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S): Illness Level at Visit 1At baseline visit (max. 4 weeks after the screening visit)
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) is a 7 item scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. Possible ratings are: 1. Normal, not at all ill 2. Borderline mentally ill 3. Mildly ill 4. Moderately ill 5. Markedly ill 6. Severely ill 7. Among the most extremely ill patients
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving Each Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S): Illness Level at Visit 5Visit 5 (30 weeks after Baseline Visit)
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) is a 7 item scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. Possible ratings are: 1. Normal, not at all ill 2. Borderline mentally ill 3. Mildly ill 4. Moderately ill 5. Markedly ill 6. Severely ill 7. Among the most extremely ill patients
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving Each Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S): Illness Level at Visit 648 weeks after baseline visit
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) is a 7 item scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. Possible ratings are: 1. Normal, not at all ill 2. Borderline mentally ill 3. Mildly ill 4. Moderately ill 5. Markedly ill 6. Severely ill 7. Among the most extremely ill patients

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange of Score in Motor Examination (ME) of the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS-ME) From V1 to V7.52 weeks
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPossible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the Change in the UMSARS - ME in the Wash-out Phase (From V6-V7)4 weeks
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the UMSARS Total Score From V1 to V752 weeks
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPossible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the UMSARS Total Score From V6 to V7 (During the Washout Phase)4 weeks
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Striatal Volume Loss in MRI (3D MP-RAGE MRI Volumetry, 3D FLAIR) From Baseline to V7 as Effect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo)baseline to 52 weeks
17 patients in the EGCG-group and 15 patients in the placebo group took part in the MRI substudy.~A reduced number of 11 patients were analysed in the EGCG group and 8 patients in the Placebo group, as only these patients had taken part in the follow-up MRI assessments.
% of volume lossMEAN
SECONDARYClinical Safety and Tolerability of EGCG Measured by Death Rates52 weeks
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYEffect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo) on Safety and Tolerability: Discontinuation Rates Because of Hepatotoxicity52 weeks
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving Each Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S): Illness Level at Visit 1At baseline visit (max. 4 weeks after the screening visit)
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving Each Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S): Illness Level at Visit 5Visit 5 (30 weeks after Baseline Visit)
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.~In the EGCG group only 36 of 47 patients provided data at visit 5 due to SAE/drop out; likewise in the placebo group only 37 of 45 patients.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving Each Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S): Illness Level at Visit 648 weeks after baseline visit
Eligible patients were older than 30 years; met the diagnostic criteria for possible or probable parkinsonism-predominant or cerebellar-ataxia-predominant multiple system atrophy; could ambulate independently (ie, Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3); and had to be on stable anti-Parkinson's, anti-dysautonomia, anti-dementia, and anti-depressant regimens.~In the EGCG group only 32 of 47 patients provided data at visit 6 due to SAE/drop out; likewise in the placebo group only 35 of 45 patients.
participantsNUMBER

Results by group98

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change of Score in Motor Examination (ME) of the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS-ME) From V1 to V7.EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent5.66Standard Deviation 1.01score on a scale
Change of Score in Motor Examination (ME) of the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS-ME) From V1 to V7.Placebo6.60Standard Deviation 0.99score on a scale
Possible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the Change in the UMSARS - ME in the Wash-out Phase (From V6-V7)EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent0.68Standard Deviation 0.60score on a scale
Possible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the Change in the UMSARS - ME in the Wash-out Phase (From V6-V7)Placebo0.49Standard Deviation 0.58score on a scale
Change in the UMSARS Total Score From V1 to V7EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent10.33Standard Deviation 1.73score on a scale
Change in the UMSARS Total Score From V1 to V7Placebo10.35Standard Deviation 1.71score on a scale
Possible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the UMSARS Total Score From V6 to V7 (During the Washout Phase)EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent0.70Standard Deviation 0.91score on a scale
Possible Symptomatic Effects of EGCG vs. Placebo Measured by the UMSARS Total Score From V6 to V7 (During the Washout Phase)Placebo-0.29Standard Deviation 0.88score on a scale
Percentage of Striatal Volume Loss in MRI (3D MP-RAGE MRI Volumetry, 3D FLAIR) From Baseline to V7 as Effect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo)EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent-0.029Standard Deviation 0.027% of volume loss
Percentage of Striatal Volume Loss in MRI (3D MP-RAGE MRI Volumetry, 3D FLAIR) From Baseline to V7 as Effect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo)Placebo-0.064Standard Deviation 0.026% of volume loss

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent47
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo45
Overall StudyCompletion of Study AssessmentEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent31
Overall StudyCompletion of Study AssessmentPlacebo33
Overall StudyCompletion Without Protocol ViolationEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent30
Overall StudyCompletion Without Protocol ViolationPlacebo33
Overall StudyParticipation in MRI SubstudyEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent17
Overall StudyParticipation in MRI SubstudyPlacebo15
Overall StudyCompletion of MRI SubstudyEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent11
Overall StudyCompletion of MRI SubstudyPlacebo8

Adverse events50

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUTIRenal and urinary disordersEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent94714
otherUTIRenal and urinary disordersPlacebo124518
otherurinary dysfunctionRenal and urinary disordersEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent3473
otherurinary dysfunctionRenal and urinary disordersPlacebo6456
otherdysarthriaNervous system disordersEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent0470
otherdysarthriaNervous system disordersPlacebo4454
otherdysphagiaNervous system disordersEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent4475
otherdysphagiaNervous system disordersPlacebo0450
otherfallsNervous system disordersEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent174726
otherfallsNervous system disordersPlacebo174531

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent447
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo245
Total, other adverse eventsEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent2547
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3345
Total, serious adverse eventsEGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent1847
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo845

Papers19

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
11553681BACKGROUNDPubMed
11943691BACKGROUNDPubMed
12960117BACKGROUNDPubMed
14607318BACKGROUNDPubMed
15452868BACKGROUNDPubMed
15580809BACKGROUNDPubMed
16424063BACKGROUNDPubMed
17256961BACKGROUNDPubMed
18307243BACKGROUNDPubMed
18725592BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 19

See all 19 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent vs Placebo: Effect of Treatment (Epigallocatechin Gallate vs Placebo) on Safety and Tolerability: Discontinuation Rates Because of HepatotoxicityTrial comparisons
EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent vs Placebo: Clinical Safety and Tolerability of EGCG Measured by Death RatesTrial comparisons
EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
EGCG as Putative Neuroprotective Agent vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02008721

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02008721/results?page=2