ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02014519

A Study to Determine the Seroprevalence of Bordetella Pertussis in Adults in Hungary

NCT02014519, Not applicable, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2018-12-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Determine the Seroprevalence of Bordetella Pertussis in Adults in Hungary. Trials, record NCT02014519. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02014519

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Determine the Seroprevalence of Bordetella Pertussis in Adults in Hungary
NCT number
NCT02014519
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
2,000 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Pertussis, Pertussis Vaccines
Interventions
Blood sampling, Data collection
First posted
2013-12-18
Last updated
2019-11-26
Results first posted
2018-12-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes37

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-pertussis Toxin (Anti-PT) ConcentrationsAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)Seropositivity was defined as anti-PT IgG levels above the sensitivity limit of the assay (\> 0.3 Optical Density (OD) units)
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent InfectionAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The cut-off value for anti-PT IgG levels strongly indicative of current/recent infection was greater than or equal to (≥) 1.5 OD units
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Indicative of Current/Recent InfectionAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The cut-off value for anti-PT IgG levels indicative of current/recent infection was greater than or equal to (≥) 1.0 OD units.
PrimaryNumber of Seronegative Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT ConcentrationsAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)Seronegativity was defined as anti-PT IgG levels under the sensitivity limit of the assay (≤ 0.3 OD units)
SecondaryNumber of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0).Seropositivity was defined as anti-PT IgG levels above the sensitivity limit of the assay (\> 0.3 OD units).
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The cut-off value for anti-PT IgG levels strongly indicative of current/recent infection was greater than or equal to (≥) 1.5 OD units
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The cut-off value for anti-PT IgG levels indicative of current/recent infection was greater than or equal to (≥) 1.0 OD units.
SecondaryNumber of Seronegative Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)Seronegativity was defined as anti-PT IgG levels under the sensitivity limit of the assay (≤ 0.3 OD units)
SecondaryNumber of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Gender)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)Seropositivity was defined as anti-PT IgG levels above the sensitivity limit of the assay (\> 0.3 OD units)
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Gender)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The cut-off value for anti-PT IgG levels strongly indicative of current/recent infection was greater than or equal to (≥) 1.5 OD units

Outcomes37

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-pertussis Toxin (Anti-PT) ConcentrationsAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent InfectionAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Indicative of Current/Recent InfectionAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Seronegative Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT ConcentrationsAt the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0).The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Seronegative Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Gender)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Gender)At the time of enrollment of each subject (Day 0)The analysis was performed on the According-to-Protocol (ATP) cohort included all evaluable subjects for whom valid laboratory test results for anti-pertussis toxin antibodies were available.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group82

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-pertussis Toxin (Anti-PT) ConcentrationsStudy Group295Participants
Number of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent InfectionStudy Group2Participants
Number of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Indicative of Current/Recent InfectionStudy Group22Participants
Number of Seronegative Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT ConcentrationsStudy Group1704Participants
Number of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)18-29 Years Group67Participants
Number of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)30-44 Years Group67Participants
Number of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)45-59 Years Group56Participants
Number of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Age)≥ 60 Years Group105Participants
Number of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Age)18-29 Years Group0Participants
Number of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Age)30-44 Years Group1Participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDStudy Group2,000
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStudy Group2,000
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStudy Group0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityStudy Group02,000
Total, other adverse eventsStudy Group00
Total, serious adverse eventsStudy Group02,000

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
28376739BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Male Group vs Female Group: Number of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Not Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Gender)Trial comparisons
Female Group vs Male Group: Number of Seropositive Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Gender)Trial comparisons
Female Group vs Male Group: Number of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Gender)Trial comparisons
Female Group vs Male Group: Number of Seronegative Subjects in Terms of Anti-PT Concentrations (by Gender)Trial comparisons
Female Group vs Male Group: Number of Subjects With Anti-PT IgG Levels Strongly Indicative of Current/Recent Infection (by Gender)Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02014519

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02014519/registered?page=2