ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02021318

Registered outcomes61

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Hb Response to Treatment at Two Consecutive Visits During the First 24 Weeks of Treatment Without Rescue TherapyBaseline to week 24
Hb response was measured as Yes or No. Response Yes (responders) was defined as: Hb ≥11.0 g/dL and Hb change from baseline by ≥ 1.0 g/dL, for participants with baseline Hb \> 8.0 g/dL; or Hb change from baseline by ≥ 2.0 g/dL, for participants with baseline Hb ≤ 8.0 g/dL at two consecutive visits with available data separated at least 5 days during the first 24 weeks of treatment without having received rescue therapy (red blood cell \[RBC\] transfusion for all participants or darbepoetin for roxadustat treated participant).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hb to the Average Hb of Weeks 28 to 36 Without Rescue Therapy Within 6 Weeks Prior to and During This 8-Week Evaluation PeriodBaseline and weeks 28 to 36Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of all available central laboratory Hb values collected before or including the date of first study drug intake (predose).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to the Average LDL-C of Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28Baseline LDL-C was defined as the LDL-C value on day 1. If this value was missing, the latest value prior to first study drug administration was used.
SecondaryTime to First Intravenous Iron UseWeeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36
Participants were analyzed during the efficacy emergent period. The efficacy emergent period was defined as the evaluation period from the analysis date of first dose intake up to end of treatment (EOT) Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period). For participants who had received more than one intravenous iron, only their first event following study treatment was used. Data reported was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate for cumulative proportion and the 95% confidence interval was calculated with Greenwood's formula. Percentage of participants were reported in this outcome measure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Functioning (PF) Sub-Score to the Average PF Sub Score in Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28
Baseline SF-36 PF was defined as the SF-36 PF value on Day 1.The SF-36 is a Quality of Life (QoL) instrument designed to assess generic health concepts relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups. The SF-36 contains 36 items that measured eight scales: (1) physical functioning; (2) role limitations due to physical health problems; (3) bodily pain; (4) social functioning; (5) general health perceptions; (6) role limitations due to emotional problems; (7) vitality, energy or fatigue; and (8) mental health. Each scale is transformed into 0-100 score, with higher scores indicating better health status. The SF-36 PF consisted of 11 questions that focused on health and ability to do usual activities, with higher scores indicating better health status.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality (VT) Sub-Score to the Average VT Sub-Score in Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28
Baseline VT Subscore was defined as the VT value on Day 1. The SF-36 is a QoL instrument designed to assess generic health concepts relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups. The SF-36 vitality has four questions with score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better vitality status.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) to the Average MAP Value in Weeks 20 to 28: Per Protocol SetBaseline and weeks 20 to 28
Baseline MAP was defined as the MAP value on Day 1. If this value was missing, the latest value prior to first study drug administration was used. MAP was derived as: MAP = (2/3)\*diastolic blood pressure (DBP) + (1/3)\*systolic blood pressure (SBP).
SecondaryTime to First Occurrence of Hypertension During Weeks 1 to 36: Per Protocol SetWeeks 1 to 36
Hypertension was defined as either SBP ≥ 170 mmHg and an increase from baseline ≥ 20 mmHg or as DBP ≥ 110 mmHg and an increase from baseline ≥ 15 mmHg. For participants who had experienced more than one event, only their first event following study treatment was used. Data reported was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate for cumulative proportion. Percentage of participants were reported in this outcome measure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MAP to the Average MAP Value in Weeks 20 to 28: Full Analysis SetBaseline and weeks 20 to 28Baseline MAP was defined as the MAP value on Day 1. If this value was missing, the latest value prior to first study drug administration was used. MAP was derived as: MAP = (2/3)\*DBP + (1/3)\*SBP.
SecondaryTime to First Occurrence of Hypertension During Weeks 1 to 36: Full Analysis SetWeeks 1 to 36
Hypertension was defined as either SBP ≥ 170 mmHg and an increase from baseline ≥ 20 mmHg or as DBP ≥ 110 mmHg and an increase from baseline ≥ 15 mmHg. For participants who had experienced more than one event, only their first event following study treatment was used. Data reported was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate for cumulative proportion. Percentage of participants were reported in this outcome measure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hb to the Average Hb Value of Weeks 28 to 52 Regardless of Rescue TherapyBaseline and weeks 28 to 52Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of all available central laboratory Hb values collected before or including the date of first study drug intake (pre-dose).
SecondaryTime to First Hb Response During First 24 Weeks of Treatment Regardless of Administration of Rescue TherapyWeeks 1 to 24
Participants were analyzed during the efficacy emergent period. The efficacy emergent period was defined as the evaluation period from the analysis date of first dose intake up to EOT Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period). For participants who had experienced more than one event, only their first event was used. Data reported was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate for cumulative proportion. Percentage of participants were reported in this outcome measure.
SecondaryTime to First Hb Response During First 24 Weeks of Treatment Without Rescue TherapyWeeks 1 to 24
Participants were analyzed during the efficacy emergent period. The efficacy emergent period was defined as the evaluation period from the analysis date of first dose intake up to EOT Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period). For participants who had experienced more than one event, only their first event was used. Data reported was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate for cumulative proportion. Percentage of participants were reported in this outcome measure.
SecondaryHb Level Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 36, 44 to 52, 72 to 80 and 96 to 104 Without Rescue TherapyWeeks 28 to 36, 44 to 52, 72 to 80 and 96 to 104Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of all available central laboratory Hb values collected before or including the date of first study drug intake (predose).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hb to Each Postdosing Time Point Regardless Use of Rescue TherapyBaseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 100 and 104Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of all available central laboratory Hb values collected before or including the date of first study drug intake (pre-dose).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hb to Average Hb Value of Weeks 28 to 36, 44 to 52, 72 to 80, 96 to 104 Regardless of Use of Rescue TherapyBaseline and weeks 28 to 36, 44 to 52, 72 to 80 and 96 to 104Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of all available central laboratory Hb values collected before or including the date of first study drug intake (predose).
SecondaryPercentage of Hb Values >=10 g/dL and Within 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL in Weeks 28 to 36, 44 to 52, and 96 to 104 Without Use of Rescue TherapyWeeks 28 to 36, 44 to 52 and 96 to 104
Percentage for each participant was calculated from the number of Hb values within 10.0-12.0 g/dL / total number of Hb values\*100 in weeks 28 to 36, 44 to 52 and 96 to 104 without use of rescue therapy within 6 weeks prior to and during the 8 week evaluation period.
SecondaryTime to First Hb Rate of Rise > 2 g/dL Within 4 WeeksYear 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2
Participants were analyzed during the efficacy emergent period. The efficacy emergent period was defined as the evaluation period from the analysis date of first dose intake up to EOT Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period). For participants who had experienced more than one event, only their first event was used. Data reported was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate for cumulative proportion and the 95% confidence interval was calculated with Greenwood's formula. Percentage of participants were reported in this outcome measure.
SecondaryNumber of HospitalizationsBaseline to EOT (up to week 104)
The number of hospitalizations per participant were calculated during the efficacy emergent period. The efficacy emergent period was defined as the evaluation period from the analysis date of first dose intake up to EOT Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period).
SecondaryNumber of Days of Hospitalization Per YearBaseline to EOT (up to week 104)
The number of days of hospitalization per year was calculated as the sum of the durations of all hospitalizations in days (minimum \[date of discharge, end of efficacy of emergent period\] - date of admission + 1) / (duration of efficacy emergent period in days / 365.25). The efficacy emergent period was defined as the evaluation period from the analysis date of first dose intake up to EOT Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period).

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02021318/registered