ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02023866

Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Study Assessing Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, of RP103 in Mitochondrial Disease

NCT02023866, Phase 2, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2017-11-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Study Assessing Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, of RP103 in Mitochondrial Disease. Trials, record NCT02023866. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02023866

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Study Assessing Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, of RP103 in Mitochondrial Disease
NCT number
NCT02023866
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
36 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Inherited Mitochondrial Disease, Including Leigh Syndrome
Interventions
Cysteamine Bitartrate
First posted
2013-12-30
Last updated
2024-12-27
Results first posted
2017-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IVBaseline through Week 24
The NPMDS evaluates the progression of mitochondrial disease in pediatric patients in 4 domains: I - Current Function (vision, hearing, communication, feeding, and mobility) with scores ranging from 0 to 21; II -System Specific Involvement (seizures, encephalopathy, bleeding diathesis or coagulation defects, gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, cardiovascular, renal, liver, and blood) with scores ranging from 0 to 30. III - Current Clinical Assessment (growth and development over past 6 months, vision, strabismus and eye movement, myopathy, ataxia, pyramidal, extrapyramidal, and neuropathy) with scores ranging from 0 to 28; and IV - Quality of Life with scores ranging from 0 to 25. For sections I-III, higher scores reflect more severe disease. For Section IV, a higher score reflects a lower quality of life.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in GlutathioneBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Glutathione DisulfideBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Lactic AcidBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk TestBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: Myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Myopathy was assessed using the 6 minute walk test, which measures the distance walked in a 6 minute walk test.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Jamar Dynamometer Hand StrengthBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Myopathy was assessed using standard grip strength evaluation, which measures hand strength in both hands using a Jamar dynamometer.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Dystonia symptoms were assessed using the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale for Dystonia. Participants were assessed for dystonia in each of the following regions: eyes, mouth, neck, trunk, and each upper and lower extremity (8 body regions) on a scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe symptoms). The individual scores were summed to calculate the total score which ranges from 0 (dystonia absent) to 32 (severe dystonia).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Friedreich Ataxia Rating ScaleBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Ataxia was assessed using the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS). FARS comprises a functional ataxia staging score of overall mobility (score 0 to 6), an assessment of the activities of daily living (ADL) (score 0 to 36) and a neurological assessment (score from 0 to 117) which is composed of bulbar (score 0-11), upper limb (score 0- 36) and lower limb (score 0-16), peripheral nerve (score 0-26) and upright stability/gait (score 0-28). The scores were summed to calculate the total score which ranges from 0 to 159. A higher score indicates a greater level of disability.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Gross Motor FunctionBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit. Retarded motor development was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 which consists of 88 items scored on a scale of 0 to 3: 0: Does not initiate the task; 1. Initiates the task (completes \< 10%); 2. Partially completes the task (10 to 99%); 3. Completes the task (100%). The 88 items are grouped into five dimensions: 1) lying and rolling, 2) sitting, 3) crawling and kneeling, 4) standing, and 5) walking, running and jumping. Scores are expressed as a percentage of the maximum score for that dimension. The total score is the average of the 5 the percentage scores where higher scores indicate better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Lansky Play Performance ScaleBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
The investigator selected the 2 most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms were assessed at each subsequent study visit. Reduced activities of daily living was assessed using the modified Lansky Play Performance Scale, completed by parents based on their child's activity in the past week, where 100=fully active; 90=minor restrictions in strenuous physical activity; 80=active, gets tired more quickly; 70=greater restriction of play, less time spent in play activity; 60=up and around, active play minimal; quieter activities; 50=lying around much of the day; no active playing, all quiet play and activities; 40=mainly in bed; quiet activities; 30=bedbound; needs assistance even for quiet play; 20=sleeps often; play limited to very passive activities; 10=doesn't play or get out of bed; 5=unresponsive 0=dead

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IVBaseline through Week 24
Completers Analysis Set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug (RP103) with at least one post-baseline NPMDS assessment and an evaluable Week 24 NPMDS assessment within the protocol specified window.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in GlutathioneBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
The pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline PD assessment. Participants with available data at each time point are included in the analysis.
µmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Glutathione DisulfideBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24PD analysis set participants with available data at each time point.µmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Lactic AcidBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24PD analysis set participants with available data at each time point.mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk TestBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Participants who received at least one dose of study drug (RP103) and had at least one post-baseline 6 minute walk test assessment and for whom myopathy was prespecified as a preeminent symptom and with available data at each time point.
metersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Jamar Dynamometer Hand StrengthBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Participants who received at least one dose of study drug (RP103) and had at least one post-baseline Jamar hand strength assessment and for whom myopathy was prespecified as a preeminent symptom and with available data at each time point.
kgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Participants who received at least one dose of study drug (RP103) and had at least one post-baseline dystonia assessment and for whom dystonia was prespecified as a preeminent symptom and with available data at each time point.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Friedreich Ataxia Rating ScaleBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Participants who received at least one dose of study drug (RP103) and had at least one post-baseline ataxia assessment and for whom ataxia was prespecified as a preeminent symptom and with available data at each time point.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Gross Motor FunctionBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Participants who received at least one dose of study drug (RP103) and had at least one post-baseline gross motor function assessment and for whom retarded motor development was prespecified as a preeminent symptom and with available data at each time point.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Modified Lansky Play Performance ScaleBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Participants who received at least one dose of study drug (RP103) and had at least one post-baseline Lansky play performance scale assessment and for whom reduced activities of daily living was prespecified as a preeminent symptom and with available data at each time point.
units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group64

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IVCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseSection I-0.3Standard Deviation 0.7units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IVCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseSection II0.1Standard Deviation 1.1units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IVCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseSection III-0.6Standard Deviation 1.2units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IVCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseSection IV0.0Standard Deviation 4.0units on a scale
Change From Baseline in GlutathioneCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseWeek 416.8Standard Deviation 277.1µmol/L
Change From Baseline in GlutathioneCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseWeek 8141.5Standard Deviation 275.5µmol/L
Change From Baseline in GlutathioneCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseWeek 1210.2Standard Deviation 419.4µmol/L
Change From Baseline in GlutathioneCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseWeek 1688.7Standard Deviation 343.9µmol/L
Change From Baseline in GlutathioneCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseWeek 2051.4Standard Deviation 207.8µmol/L
Change From Baseline in GlutathioneCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseWeek 24122.4Standard Deviation 244.8µmol/L

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release36
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release30
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release6

Adverse events135

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherMotion sicknessEar and labyrinth disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherEye movement disorderEye disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherEye painEye disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherEyelid oedemaEye disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherEyelid ptosisEye disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release236
otherMydriasisEye disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherOcular hyperaemiaEye disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release136
Total, other adverse eventsCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release3536
Total, serious adverse eventsCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release1136

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
18702664BACKGROUNDPubMed
19960200BACKGROUNDPubMed
20569301BACKGROUNDPubMed
22208644BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02023866

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02023866/results?page=2