ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02027311

Etomidate vs. Midazolam for Sedation During ERCP

NCT02027311, Phase 4, Completed, Cheju Halla General Hospital; results first posted 2015-06-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Etomidate vs. Midazolam for Sedation During ERCP. Trials, record NCT02027311. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02027311

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Etomidate vs. Midazolam for Sedation During ERCP
NCT number
NCT02027311
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
63 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Cheju Halla General Hospital
Conditions
Choledocholithiasis, Cholangiocarcinoma, Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Cancer
Interventions
Etomidate, Midazolam, Meperidine
First posted
2014-01-06
Last updated
2015-06-29
Results first posted
2015-06-29
Limitations and caveats
1. To standardize proper sedation level we used Ramsay Sedation Scale but this scale could be calculated subjectively.~2. Double blindness was not applied strictly because of quite different pharmacodynamics of two experimental drugs.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of InterventionThroughout the whole ERCP procedure
The frequency of intervention which was defined as any restraint of the patient's head, arms, or legs if they became agitated, or if patient movement was not controlled with verbal instruction from the endoscopist during the whole intraoperative phases.
SecondaryEvent of HypoxiaEvery 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phaseHypoxia defined as peripheral blood oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxymeter \< 90%

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of InterventionThroughout the whole ERCP procedureNumber of interventionMEAN
SECONDARYEvent of HypoxiaEvery 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phaseHypoxia eventsNUMBER

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of InterventionEtomidate1.9Standard Deviation 3.1Number of intervention
Number of InterventionMidazolam7.5Standard Deviation 6.8Number of intervention
Event of HypoxiaMidazolam19Hypoxia events
Event of HypoxiaEtomidate27Hypoxia events

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEtomidate33
Overall StudySTARTEDMidazolam35
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEtomidate30
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMidazolam33
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEtomidate3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMidazolam2

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEtomidate
Total, all-cause mortalityMidazolam
Total, other adverse eventsEtomidate030
Total, other adverse eventsMidazolam033
Total, serious adverse eventsEtomidate030
Total, serious adverse eventsMidazolam033

Papers26

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
1034320BACKGROUNDPubMed
2104078BACKGROUNDPubMed
3377928BACKGROUNDPubMed
8163147BACKGROUNDPubMed
10718389BACKGROUNDPubMed
10718390BACKGROUNDPubMed
11094504BACKGROUNDPubMed
11136141BACKGROUNDPubMed
12024134BACKGROUNDPubMed
12612511BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 26

See all 26 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Etomidate vs Midazolam: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02027311

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02027311/papers?page=2