ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02037048

FOLFOX-6 Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy and Post-operative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

NCT02037048, Phase 2, Unknown, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. FOLFOX-6 Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy and Post-operative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Trials, record NCT02037048. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02037048

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
FOLFOX-6 Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy and Post-operative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
NCT number
NCT02037048
Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
63 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Conditions
Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus, Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction, Adenocarcinoma of the Gastric Cardia, Stage IIIA Esophageal Cancer, Stage IIIB Esophageal Cancer, Stage IIIC Esophageal Cancer
Interventions
oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, therapeutic conventional surgery, radiation therapy, carboplatin, paclitaxel
First posted
2014-01-15
Last updated
2024-01-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRecurrence Free Survival (RFS) compared to historical averages1 year
Compare the number of study patients who achieved RFS with \>50% remaining viable tumor after response adapted adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to historical data among patients with \>50% viable tumor after induction chemotherapy. A once sided test (p\<=0.05) will be used to describe significance of change.
SecondarySymptomatic responseUp to 5 years
Symptomatic response is defined as improvement in dysphagia by 1 grade from baseline. Level 1 - No dysphagia. Level 2 - Minimal dysphagia, able to swallow liquids and most solid foods, experiencing occasional difficulty. Level 3 - Moderate dysphagia, able to swallow liquids and very soft foods. Level 4 - Severe dysphagia, unable to swallow liquids or solids. Significance of change will be calculated using 95% confidence intervals.
SecondaryEndoscopic responseUp to 5 years
Complete response = no residual abnormality (cyT0N0-Stage 0). Partial response = any improvement in the clinically determined T or N stage (without reciprocal deterioration in T or N) when compared to the pretreatment clinical stage as assessed by EGD/EUS. Stable disease = no change in the clinical T or N stage when compared to the pretreatment assessment. Progressive disease = any increase in the T or N stage (irrespective of any reciprocal improvement in the T or N stage) when compared to the pretreatment clinical stage as assessed by EGD/EUS. Endoscopic response will be estimated using exact 95% confidence intervals.
SecondaryPathologic responseUp to 5 years
A positive pathologic response (+PR) will be defined as ≤ 50% residual tumor cells remaining. A negative pathologic response (-PR) will be defined as \>50% residual tumor cells remaining. Pathologic response will be described using exact 95% confidence intervals.
SecondaryComplete resection (R0) rateUp to 5 yearsR0 resection is defined as the resection of all gross and microscopic tumor. R0 resections will be estimated using exact 95% confidence intervals.
SecondaryIncidence of toxicityUp to 5 years
Toxicities will be graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The number of toxicities will be estimated using exact 95% confidence intervals.
SecondaryRFS within study patientsTime from start of treatment until first recurrence or death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
RFS will be compared between patients with ≤ 50% and \> 50% viable tumor using the log-rank test. Outcomes will be calculated relative to the start of therapy. Log rank tests will be used to estimate the hazard ratio for RFS for patients with \> 50% viable tumor relative to those with ≤ 50%. If there are a sufficient number of events, multivariable Cox analysis will be done to adjust for other prognostic factors.
SecondaryOSTime from start of treatment until death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
OS will be compared between patients with ≤ 50% and \> 50% viable tumor using the log-rank test. Outcomes will be calculated relative to the start of therapy. Log rank tests will be used to estimate the hazard ratio for OS for patients with \> 50% viable tumor relative to those with ≤ 50%. If there are a sufficient number of events, multivariable Cox analysis will be done to adjust for other prognostic factors.
SecondaryRate of Distant Metastatic Control (DMC)Up to 5 yearsKaplan Meier analysis will be used to estimate distant recurrence
SecondaryLoco-regional control (LRC)Up to 5 yearsKaplan-Meier analysis will be used to estimate local recurrence

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
P30CA043703Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Support GrantSCHWARTZ, GARY KCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1987 to 2025

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02037048

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02037048/registered