ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02038036

Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy.

NCT02038036, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2021-07-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy. Trials, record NCT02038036. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02038036

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Ruxolitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With HU Resistant or Intolerant Polycythemia Vera vs Best Available Therapy.
NCT number
NCT02038036
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
149 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Polycythemia Vera
Interventions
Best Available Therapy, Ruxolitinib
First posted
2014-01-16
Last updated
2021-07-20
Results first posted
2021-07-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes25

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28Week 28
Proportion of patients achieving Hct control at Week 28 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8. Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by: * Confirmed Hct \> 45% that is at least 3 percentage points higher than the Hct obtained at Baseline Or * Confirmed Hct \> 48% The confirmation occurred 2 to 14 days subsequent to the initial observation.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28Week 28
Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 28 was defined by: * Hct control at Week 28 defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and * WBC \< 10 x109/L at Week 28, and * Platelets ≤ 400 x 109/L at Week 28
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80Week 52 and 80
Proportion of patients achieving a Hct control at Week 52 was defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 52, and no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8 \- Endpoint for Week 80 was defined, similarly.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80Week 52 and 80
Proportion of patients achieving a complete hematological remission at Week 52, was defined by: * Hct control at Week 52, as defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 52 with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and * White Blood Count (WBC) \< 10 x10\^9/L at Week 52, and * Platelets ≤ 400 x 10\^9/L at Week 52 * Endpoint for Week 80 was defined, similarly.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Phlebotomies Over TimeBaseline to Week 260
Phlebotomy eligibility was defined by Confirmed Hct \> 45% that is at least 3 percentage points higher than the Hct obtained at Baseline Or Confirmed Hct \> 48%. The confirmation occurred 2 to 14 days subsequent to the initial observation.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each VisitBaseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260Hematocrit is the volume percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Scheduled Visit After Crossover in Participants Randomized to BAT Who Cross Over to RuxolitinibBaseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 64, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206, 219 and 232 after cross-overHematocrit is the percentage of red blood cells (RBC) in the blood.
SecondarySpleen Length by VisitWeek 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260Spleen length was assessed by manual palpation at every study visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status to Week 28Baseline and Week 28
The ECOG scale of performance status described the level of functioning of participants in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activity, and physical ability. The ECOG performance was recorded as per ECOG performance status grades ranging from 0 (fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction) to 5 (dead).
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving a Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 28Week 28
Proportion of patients achieving a partial remission at Week 28, based on the ELN and IWG-MRT criteria, as defined by: * Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS) score reduction of greater than or equal to 10 points from baseline to Week 28, and * Hct control defined by the absence of phlebotomy eligibility starting at Week 8 and continuing through Week 28, with no more than one phlebotomy eligibility occurring post randomization and prior to Week 8, and * WBC \< 10 x10\^9/L at Week 28, and * Platelets ≤ 400 x 10\^9/L at Week 28, and * No palpable spleen at Week 28, and * No hemorrhagic or thrombotic events, and * No transformation into post-PV myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome (IWG-MRT criteria) or acute leukemia (WHO criteria).

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28Week 28Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28Week 28Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80Week 52 and 80Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80Week 52 and 80Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Phlebotomies Over TimeBaseline to Week 260Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each VisitBaseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT are reported as separate outcome measure.
volume percentage of RBC in bloodMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Each Scheduled Visit After Crossover in Participants Randomized to BAT Who Cross Over to RuxolitinibBaseline (last assessment before cross over), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 64, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206, 219 and 232 after cross-overCross-over set consisted of all participants randomized to the BAT arm, who crossed over and received at least one dose of ruxolitinib.Volume percentage of RBC in bloodMEAN
SECONDARYSpleen Length by VisitWeek 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 40, 52, 66, 80, 92, 104, 117, 130, 143, 156, 169, 182, 195, 208, 221, 234, 247 and 260
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure. Data after crossover for participants randomized to BAT were not collected.
cmMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status to Week 28Baseline and Week 28Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving a Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 28Week 28Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants to whom study treatment was assigned by randomization and had valid measurements for the outcome measure.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group484

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28Ruxolitinib46Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28Best Available Therapy (BAT)14Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28Ruxolitinib17Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28Best Available Therapy (BAT)4Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80RuxolitinibWeek 5244Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80Best Available Therapy (BAT)Week 525Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80RuxolitinibWeek 8035Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 52 and Week 80Best Available Therapy (BAT)Week 802Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80RuxolitinibWeek 5217Participants
Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 52 and Week 80Best Available Therapy (BAT)Week 523Participants

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Core StudySTARTEDRuxolitinib74
Core StudySTARTEDBest Available Therapy (BAT)75
Core StudyFull Analysis SetRuxolitinib74
Core StudyFull Analysis SetBest Available Therapy (BAT)75
Core StudyCrossover SetRuxolitinib0
Core StudyCrossover SetBest Available Therapy (BAT)58
Core StudyCOMPLETEDRuxolitinib59
Core StudyCOMPLETEDBest Available Therapy (BAT)61
Core StudyNOT COMPLETEDRuxolitinib15
Core StudyNOT COMPLETEDBest Available Therapy (BAT)14

Adverse events570

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib2774
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBest Available Therapy175
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAll Crossover Patients1958
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib574
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersBest Available Therapy475
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersAll Crossover Patients358
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib574
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBest Available Therapy675
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAll Crossover Patients358
otherThrombocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib874

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib174
Total, all-cause mortalityBest Available Therapy175
Total, all-cause mortalityAll Crossover Patients358
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib7374
Total, other adverse eventsBest Available Therapy5675
Total, other adverse eventsAll Crossover Patients5658
Total, serious adverse eventsRuxolitinib3474
Total, serious adverse eventsBest Available Therapy975
Total, serious adverse eventsAll Crossover Patients2358

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27916398DERIVEDPubMed
29396713DERIVEDPubMed
35597252DERIVEDPubMed
41890273DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT): Number of Participants Achieving a Partial Remission Based on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) Criteria at Week 28
Trial comparisons
Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT): Number of Participants Achieving a Complete Hematological Remission at Week 28Trial comparisons
Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT): Number of Participants With Transformation Free Survival EventsTrial comparisons
Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT): Number of Participants Developing ThrombosisTrial comparisons
Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT): Number of Participants Achieving Hematocrit (Hct) Control at Week 28Trial comparisons
Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT): Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) EventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02038036

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02038036/registered?page=2