ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02048813

Ibrutinib and Rituximab Compared With Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

NCT02048813, Phase 3, Active not recruiting, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2023-08-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ibrutinib and Rituximab Compared With Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma. Trials, record NCT02048813. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02048813

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Ibrutinib and Rituximab Compared With Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT02048813
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
529 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Anemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Interventions
Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine Phosphate, Ibrutinib, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Pharmacogenomic Study, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Rituximab
First posted
2014-01-29
Last updated
2026-08-28
Results first posted
2023-08-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at 3 YearsAssessed every 3 months until progression up to 4 years and 8 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to CLL progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progression is characterized by any of the following: * ≥ 50% increase from nadir since start of treatment (tx) in the sum of the products of at least 2 lymph nodes on 2 consecutive examinations 2 weeks apart * ≥ 50% increase from nadir since start of tx in the size of liver and/or spleen * ≥ 50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes not due to tumor flare reaction. The absolute lymphocyte count must be ≥ 5x10\^9/L to qualify as disease progression. * Transformation to a more aggressive histology (e.g. Richter's syndrome or prolymphocytic leukemia with \> 55% prolymphocytes). For patients who achieve a complete response or nodular partial response, progression is defined as recurrence of circulating leukemia cell clone in the peripheral blood and an absolute lymphocyte count \> 5x10\^9/L and/or recurrence of palpable lymphadenopathy \> 1.5 cm by physical exam.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) Rate at 3 YearsAssessed every 3 months until progression; after progression, assessed every 3 months for first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5, up to 4 years and 8 monthsOverall survival was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause or date last known alive. Overall survival rate at 3 years was estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
SecondaryThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at 6 MonthsAssessed at 6 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) is comprised of the physical well-being (PWB) and functional well-being (FWB) components of the FACT-General (FACT-G) and the leukemia subscale. The FACT-Leu TOI contains a total of 31 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 124. The higher the score, the better the quality of life (QOL).
SecondaryThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at 12 MonthsAssessed at 12 months
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) is comprised of the physical well-being (PWB) and functional well-being (FWB) components of the FACT-General (FACT-G) and the leukemia subscale. The FACT-Leu TOI contains a total of 31 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 124. The higher the score, the better the quality of life (QOL).
SecondaryThe Association Between Baseline Rai Stage and Complete Response (CR) RateAssessed at baseline, every 3 months for the first 2 years, and every 6 months for years 3-5
Patients are classified as stage 0-IV according to the Rai system and categorized into one of the three risk groups: Low risk - Stage 0 Intermediate risk - Stage I or II High risk - Stage III or IV CR requires all of the following for at least 2 months: * Absence of lymphadenopathy by physical examination on 2 occasions at least 4 weeks apart and appropriate radiographic techniques. For patients whose only measurable disease at the time of enrollment is on CT scan, a CT scan is required and all lymph nodes must be ≤ 1.5 cm before classifying the patient a CR. * Absence of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly by physical examination * Absence of constitutional symptoms due to disease * Normal complete blood count * One marrow aspirate and biopsy should be performed 52 weeks after Day 1 of cycle 1 among patients with clinical and laboratory evidence of a CR to document a CR. The marrow sample must be at least normocellular with \< 30% of nucleated cells being lymphocytes.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) by Measurable Residual Disease (MDR) Status at 2 YearsAssessed every 3 months until progression up to 5 years
PFS was defined as time from randomization to progression or death. Progression is characterized by any of the following: * ≥ 50% increase from nadir since start of treatment (tx) in the sum of the products of ≥ 2 lymph nodes on 2 consecutive exams 2 weeks apart * ≥ 50% increase from nadir since start of tx in the size of liver and/or spleen * ≥ 50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes not due to tumor flare reaction. The absolute lymphocyte count must be ≥ 5x10\^9/L to qualify as progression. * Transformation to a more aggressive histology. For patients with a complete response or nodular partial response, progression is defined as recurrence of circulating leukemia cell clone in the peripheral blood and an absolute lymphocyte count \> 5x10\^9/L and/or recurrence of palpable lymphadenopathy \>1.5 cm by physical exam. MRD status was evaluated at 2 years and samples with \<=20 monotypic events or an MRD level of \<10\^-4 were classified as undetectable MRD.
OtherDistribution of Genetic Abnormalities Before and After TreatmentAssessed at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 24, 36 monthsGenetic abnormalities are assessed at baseline and longitudinally during treatment as well as after treatment. Distribution of genetic abnormalities are reported.
OtherT-cell Counts at 12 MonthsAssessed at 12 monthsT-cell counts will be measured at 12 months.
OtherAssociation Between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and PFSAssessed every 3 months until progression; after progression, assessed every 3 months for first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5
PFS was defined as time from randomization to progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progression is characterized by any of the following: * ≥ 50% increase from nadir since start of treatment (tx) in the sum of the products of ≥2 lymph nodes on 2 consecutive examinations 2 weeks apart * ≥ 50% increase from nadir since start of tx in the size of liver and/or spleen * ≥ 50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes not due to tumor flare reaction. The absolute lymphocyte count must be ≥ 5x10\^9/L to qualify as progression. * Transformation to a more aggressive histology. For patients who achieve a complete response or nodular partial response, progression is defined as recurrence of circulating leukemia cell clone in the peripheral blood and an absolute lymphocyte count \> 5x10\^9/L and/or recurrence of palpable lymphadenopathy \> 1.5 cm by physical exam. The distribution of PFS by SNPs will be reported.
OtherPrognostic Model to Predict PFSAssessed every 3 months until progression; after progression, assessed every 3 months for first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5A prognostic model that incorporates clinical and biologic characters to predict PFS will be developed.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at 3 YearsAssessed every 3 months until progression up to 4 years and 8 monthsAll randomized patients were included in this analysis.Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) Rate at 3 YearsAssessed every 3 months until progression; after progression, assessed every 3 months for first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5, up to 4 years and 8 monthsAll randomized patients were included in this analysis.Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at 6 MonthsAssessed at 6 months
SECONDARYThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at 12 MonthsAssessed at 12 months
SECONDARYThe Association Between Baseline Rai Stage and Complete Response (CR) RateAssessed at baseline, every 3 months for the first 2 years, and every 6 months for years 3-5
SECONDARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) by Measurable Residual Disease (MDR) Status at 2 YearsAssessed every 3 months until progression up to 5 years
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDDistribution of Genetic Abnormalities Before and After TreatmentAssessed at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 24, 36 months
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDT-cell Counts at 12 MonthsAssessed at 12 months
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDAssociation Between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and PFSAssessed every 3 months until progression; after progression, assessed every 3 months for first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPrognostic Model to Predict PFSAssessed every 3 months until progression; after progression, assessed every 3 months for first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3-5

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at 3 YearsArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)0.89495% Confidence Interval 0.86 to 0.93Proportion of participants
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at 3 YearsArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)0.72995% Confidence Interval 0.653 to 0.813Proportion of participants
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 3 YearsArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)0.98895% Confidence Interval 0.976 to 1.00Proportion of participants
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 3 YearsArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)0.91595% Confidence Interval 0.862 to 0.970Proportion of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)354
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)175
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)105
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)354
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)70

Adverse events372

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)183352
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)99158
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)27352
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)0158
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)30352
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)1158
otherChillsGeneral disordersArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)20352
otherChillsGeneral disordersArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)17158
otherEdema limbsGeneral disordersArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)61352
otherEdema limbsGeneral disordersArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)14158

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)4354
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)10175
Total, other adverse eventsArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)348352
Total, other adverse eventsArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)154158
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab)270352
Total, serious adverse eventsArm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide)132158

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31365801DERIVEDPubMed
33439748DERIVEDPubMed
34865212DERIVEDPubMed
35427411DERIVEDPubMed
37801678DERIVEDPubMed

Grants4

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10CA180820ECOG-ACRIN Network Group Operations CenterODwyer, Peter J; SCHNALL, MITCHELL D.ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2026NIH RePORTER
U24CA196172ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNJEWELL, SCOTT D; HAMILTON, STANLEY R.ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2015 to 2025NIH RePORTER
R01CA193541Predicting Clinical Outcome After Traditional and Ibrutinib-based Therapy In Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaKAY, NEIL E; SHANAFELT, TAIT DMAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2015 to 2019NIH RePORTER
U10CA021115Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Operations OfficeCOMIS, ROBERT LFRONTIER SCI & TECHNOLOGY RSCH FDN, INCNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Arm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab) vs Arm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Arm A (Ibrutinib, Rituximab) vs Arm B (Rituximab, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02048813

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02048813/events?page=2