ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02053610

CLL11: A Study of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759 [GA101]) With Chlorambucil in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (Stage 2)

NCT02053610, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2014-10-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CLL11: A Study of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759 [GA101]) With Chlorambucil in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (Stage 2). Trials, record NCT02053610. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02053610

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
CLL11: A Study of Obinutuzumab (RO5072759 [GA101]) With Chlorambucil in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (Stage 2)
NCT number
NCT02053610
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
787 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic
Interventions
obinutuzumab, rituximab, chlorambucil
First posted
2014-02-03
Last updated
2018-09-14
Results first posted
2014-10-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by the investigator. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival EventsRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRandomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRandomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)Percentage of Participants with Progression Free Survival Events: progression, relapse, or death from any cause as assessed by an Independent Review Committee.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
EOTR was the first response assessment 56 days from the last dose according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (IWCLL) guidelines. Complete Response (CR) required: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. Partial Response (PR) required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Best overall response according to IWCLL guidelines was defined as the percentage of patients with CR, CRi, PR or nodular Partial Response (nPR). CR required all of the following: Peripheral blood lymphocytes below 4 x 10\^9/L, Absence of significant lymphadenopathy, No hepatomegaly, No splenomegaly, Absence of disease, Blood counts above the following values (Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/L, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L, Hemoglobin \>11g/dL) and Bone marrow at least normocellular for age. CRi was CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery. PR required the following for at least 2 months from end of treatment: ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count from the pre-treatment value AND Either a ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy OR ≥50% reduction of liver enlargement OR ≥50% reduction of spleen enlargement PLUS at least one of the following: Neutrophils \>1.5 x 10\^9/ or ≥50% increase, Platelets \>100 x 10\^9/L or ≥50% increase, Hemoglobin 11 g/dL or ≥50% increase.
SecondaryEvent Free SurvivalRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time between date of randomization and the date of disease progression/relapse, death, or start of a new anti-leukemic therapy. Progressive disease as per IWCLL criteria required at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the absolute number of lymphocytes, appearance of new palpable lymph nodes (\>15 mm in longest diameter) or any new extra nodal lesion, ≥50% increase in the longest diameter of any previous site of clinically significant lymphadenopathy, ≥50% increase in the enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, Transformation to a more aggressive histology or After treatment, the progression of any cytopenia (a decrease of hemoglobin levels \>20 g/L or \<10 g/dL or a decrease of platelet counts \>50% or \<100 x 10\^9/L or by a decrease of neutrophil counts \>50% or \<1.0 x 10\^9/L).
SecondaryOverall SurvivalRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.
SecondaryDuration of ResponseRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Duration of Response was defined as the date the response \[either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)\] was first recorded until the date of Disease Progression or death due to any cause. Response was assessed according IWCLL guidelines.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of TreatmentRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Molecular remission was defined as a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative result at the end of treatment (assessment that occurred between 56 days and 6 months of last treatment). Molecular remission was assessed for all patients using a blood sample. Additionally, a bone marrow sample was obtained from patients whom the investigator assumed to have a complete response, consistent with the IWCLL guidelines. A combined analysis of blood and bone marrow results was conducted. A patient was considered MRD negative if result was less than 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell in 10000 leukocytes (MRD value \< 0.0001) based on the method of allele specific polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR).

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Intent--to-treat population (ITT) included all randomized participants. Data for patients without disease progression or death was censored at the time of the last response assessment, or, if no response assessments were performed after the baseline visit, at the time of randomization plus one day.
monthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival EventsRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)ITT population included all randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRandomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)
Intent-to-treat population (ITT) included all randomized participants. Data for patients without disease progression or death was censored at the time of the last response assessment, or, if no response assessments were performed after the baseline visit, at the time of randomization plus one day.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRandomization to clinical cutoff of 09 May 2013 (median observation 18.7 months)ITT participants included all randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Randomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Participants from the ITT population, all randomized participants, with data available for analysis. Participants who had not reached the 3-month follow-up visit at the time of the clinical cut-off were excluded from analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Participants from the ITT population, all randomized participants, with data available for analysis. Participants who had not reached the 3-month follow-up visit at the time of the clinical cut-off were excluded from analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEvent Free SurvivalRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
ITT population included all randomized participants. Participants were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. In cases where no tumor assessment is available, participants were censored at the date of randomization plus one day.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)ITT population included all randomized participants. Participants who were not reported as having died at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDuration of ResponseRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)Participants from the ITT population, all randomized participants, with response.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Molecular Remission at the End of TreatmentRandomization to clinical cutoff (median observation 59.4 months)
Participants from the ITT population, all randomized participants, with data available for analysis. Participants who had not reached the 3-month follow-up visit at the time of the clinical cut-off were excluded from analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group130

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)15.795% Confidence Interval 14.3 to 17.2months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)28.995% Confidence Interval 26.1 to 32.7months
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival EventsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)88.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival EventsObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)73.3percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)14.995% Confidence Interval 14.2 to 17.2months
Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)26.795% Confidence Interval 23.2 to 31.1months
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)55.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival Events Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) DataObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)30.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)Complete Response (CR)4.895% Confidence Interval 2.8 to 7.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With End of Treatment Response (EOTR)Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)Complete Response (CR)15.695% Confidence Interval 11.9 to 20percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)330
Overall StudySTARTEDObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)333
Overall StudyReceived Study DrugRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)326
Overall StudyReceived Study DrugObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)331
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)288
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)266
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)42
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)67

Adverse events478

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)104321
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)128336
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)34321
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)33336
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)20321
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)46336
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)7321
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)21336
otherInfusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)118321
otherInfusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)197336

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)
Total, all-cause mortalityObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)279321
Total, other adverse eventsObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)299336
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb)124321
Total, serious adverse eventsObinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb)150336

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29255066DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Rituximab + Chlorambucil (RClb) vs Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil (GClb): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02053610

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02053610/results?page=2