ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02058368

Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment With Dutasteride and Tamsulosin With Tamsulosin Monotherapy, in Men With Moderate to Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

NCT02058368, Phase 3, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2019-04-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment With Dutasteride and Tamsulosin With Tamsulosin Monotherapy, in Men With Moderate to Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Trials, record NCT02058368. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02058368

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment With Dutasteride and Tamsulosin With Tamsulosin Monotherapy, in Men With Moderate to Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT number
NCT02058368
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
607 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Interventions
Dutasteride 0.5mg capsules, Dutasteride placebo capsules, Tamsulosin 0.2mg tablets, Disintegrating placebo tamsulosin tablet
First posted
2014-02-10
Last updated
2019-04-05
Results first posted
2019-04-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes23

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsBaseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months
IPSS (also called IPSS total score) is the sum of the seven questions with each score ranging from 0 (best) to 5 (worst). IPSS was self administered at screening, Baseline and each time-point of Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24. Seven questions included are incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia. The total IPSS score can range from 0-35 with severity catagories of mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19) or severe (20 to 35). LOCF is defined as carrying forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for participants with missing visit data and/or for participants who discontinued from the study. Baseline value is defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Month 24 is the primary timepoint and earlier timepoints are considered secondary. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value.
SecondaryPercent Change in Prostate Volume From BaselineBaseline,12 and 24 months
Prostate Volume measurements were conducted annually using Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). The following calculation was utilized to assess the prostate volume (cc): pi/6 (Anteroposterior Width multiplied by Cephalocaudal Width multiplied by Transverse Width). Post-Baseline prostate volume was calculated at 12 and 24 months. Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline was reported based on the LOCF. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value and reported as a percentage.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With IPSS Improvement From BaselineBaseline and 3, 6, 9,12,15,18,21 and 24 months
Improvement in IPSS was categorized as improvement, no change and worsening. Improvement defined as greater than or equal to 2 points, greater than or equal to 3 points and greater than or equal to 25 percent in participants at months 3,6,9,12,15,18,21 and 24 . Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline was reported based on the LOCF. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) by LOCF ApproachBaseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months
Qmax is defined as maximum urine flow. Qmax was measured with Uroflow meter (Urodyn 1000) at Screening, Baseline, and at Months 6,12,18 and 24. Change from Baseline Qmax at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment was compared in terms of combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment using t-tests from a general linear model with effects for treatment, country, and Baseline Qmax. Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Qmax Improvement From Baseline by LOCF Approach.Baseline 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months
Qmax change from Baseline was presented using six improvement levels: \>0 milliliter per second (mL/sec) and \>=1 mL/sec through \>=5mL/sec. Qmax percentage change from Baseline was presented using six improvement levels: \>0%, \>=10%, \>=20%, \>=30%, \>=40%, and \>=50%. Here, Qmax improvement of \>= 3 mL/sec and Qmax percentage of \>= 30 % for 24 Months has been summarized. Baseline value is defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline defined as difference between Post-Baseline value and Baseline value. Baseline value is defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Acute Urinary Retention (AUR) or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)-Related Prostatic SurgeryUp to 24 Months
AUR is defined as condition when the participant is unable to urinate and requires bladder catheterization. AUR or BPH-related surgery event details per participant was summarized as first occurring of either AUR or BPH-related surgery.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With AURUp to 24 MonthsAUR is defined as condition when the participant is unable to urinate and requires bladder catheterization.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With BPH-related SurgeryUp to 24 Months
BPH-related interventions were recorded. BPH-related interventions included adenomectomy, balloon dilatation, electroresection, thermotherapy (microwave or radiofrequency), laser resection, prostatectomy, prostatotomy, transurethral resection of the prostate, transurethral drainage of prostatic abscess, drainage of prostatic cysts, radioactive seeding of the prostate, prostatic urethral stenting, incision of periurethral stricture, ethanol injections into the prostate, transrectal high intensity focussed ultrasound, transurethral needle ablation and transurethral microwave thermotherapy.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) by LOCF ApproachBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 Months
BHS was collected as Question 8 the IPSS questionnaire regarding quality of life due to urinary symptom with scores values ranging from 0 (delightful) to 6 (terrible). Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from baseline BHS at each scheduled post-baseline assessment was compared in terms of combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment using t-tests from a general linear model with effects for treatment, country, and Baseline BHS.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) by LOCF ApproachBaseline 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 Months
The BII consists of four questions and BII total score is the sum of four questions. Total score range is 0 (no problem) to 13 (worst value). Baseline value was defined as the latest non-missing assessment of either treatment start date or randomization date. Change from Baseline BII at each scheduled post-baseline assessment was compared in terms of combination treatment (Dut plus Tam) versus tamsulosin treatment using t-tests from a general linear model with effects for treatment, country, and Baseline BII. Change from Baseline was summarized using LOCF approaches.

Outcomes23

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsBaseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 monthsITT Population.Score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Prostate Volume From BaselineBaseline,12 and 24 monthsITT Population.Cubic centimeters (cc)MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With IPSS Improvement From BaselineBaseline and 3, 6, 9,12,15,18,21 and 24 monthsITT Population.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) by LOCF ApproachBaseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 MonthsITT Populationmilliliter per second (mL/sec)MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Qmax Improvement From Baseline by LOCF Approach.Baseline 6, 12, 18 and 24 MonthsITT Population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Acute Urinary Retention (AUR) or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)-Related Prostatic SurgeryUp to 24 MonthsITT Population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With AURUp to 24 MonthsITT Population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With BPH-related SurgeryUp to 24 MonthsITT Population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) by LOCF ApproachBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 MonthsITT Population.Scores on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) by LOCF ApproachBaseline 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 MonthsITT Population.Scores on scaleMEAN

Results by group328

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mgMonth 3, n=299, 296-4.07Standard Error 0.34Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mgMonth 3, n=299, 296-3.28Standard Error 0.34Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mgMonth 6, n=300, 298-3.73Standard Error 0.37Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mgMonth 6, n=300, 298-3.36Standard Error 0.37Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mgMonth 9, n=300, 298-4.14Standard Error 0.36Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mgMonth 9, n=300, 298-4.28Standard Error 0.36Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mgMonth 12,n= 300, 298-3.93Standard Error 0.36Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mgMonth 12,n= 300, 298-4.30Standard Error 0.36Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mgMonth 15, n=300, 298-3.95Standard Error 0.36Score on scale
Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach at 24 MonthsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mgMonth 15, n=300, 298-4.90Standard Error 0.36Score on scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo +Tam 0.2mg302
Overall StudySTARTEDDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg305
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo +Tam 0.2mg261
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg251
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo +Tam 0.2mg41
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg54

Adverse events1,126

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg3030246
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg3730545
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg3830272
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg2430544
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg1130211
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg83058
otherPeriodontitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg73029
otherPeriodontitisInfections and infestationsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg63057
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg1030210
otherConjunctivitisInfections and infestationsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg23052

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg1302
Total, all-cause mortalityDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg2305
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg203302
Total, other adverse eventsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg208305
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo + Tam 0.2mg52302
Total, serious adverse eventsDut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg49305

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
30198102BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg vs Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Placebo + Tam 0.2mg vs Dut 0.5 mg + Tam 0.2 mg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02058368

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02058368/registered?page=2