ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02066402

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Early Clinical Response at 48-72 Hours After the First Infusion of Study Drug in the ITT Analysis Set.Baseline and 48-72 hours visit
Early clinical response is defined as responder if there is \>=20% reduction in the area of erythema, edema, and/or induration (length × width) of the primary acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) lesion, compared with baseline at the 48-72 Hour visit.
SecondaryProgrammatically Defined Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the ITT Analysis SetBaseline and EOT visit (Day 11)
Clinical Failure: Presence of fever; No lesion size decrease from baseline; Clinician assessment of tenderness worse than mild; Persistent same or great intensity purulent drainage of wound infection; Confounding use of systemic concomitant antibiotic; TEAE lead to study drug discontinuation; Require additional antibiotic treatment for primary lesion; Unplanned major surgical intervention. Clinical Success: Afebrile or fever due to other cause; Lesion size decrease from baseline; Clinician assessment of mild/absent tenderness; None/lesser intensity purulent drainage of wound infection; None confounding use of systemic concomitant antibiotic; None TEAE leading to study drug discontinuation; No additional antibiotic therapy for primary lesion; No unplanned major surgical intervention; No osteomyelitis after baseline; For wound/abscess: no incision/drainage of the ABSSSI site after Day1 unless planned. For cellulitis/ersipelas: no incision/drainage of the ABSSSI site after 48-72 H Visit.
SecondaryProgrammatically Defined Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the Clinically Evaluable at EOT (CE-EOT) Analysis SetBaseline and EOT visit (Day 11)Clinical response will be defined as percentage of participants with clinical success, clinical failure or indeterminate.
SecondaryOverall Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Success at Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (7-14 Days After EOT Visit) in the ITT Analysis SetBaseline and post-therapy evaluation visit (7-14 days after Day 11)
The Investigator made an assessment of clinical response at the PTE Visit (7-14 days after the EOT Visit +2 days). Participants assessed as a clinical failure at the EOT Visit are considered a clinical failure at the PTE Visit. Percentage of participants with clinical success, clinical failure or indeterminate were reported.
SecondaryOverall Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Success at Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (7-14 Days After EOT Visit) in the Clinically Evaluable at Post Therapy Evaluation (CE-PTE) Analysis SetBaseline and post-therapy evaluation visit (7-14 days after Day 11)
The Investigator made an assessment of clinical response at the PTE Visit (7-14 days after the EOT Visit +2 days). Participants assessed as a clinical failure at the EOT Visit are considered a clinical failure at the PTE Visit. Percentage of participants with clinical success, clinical failure or indeterminate were reported.
SecondaryInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response at 48-72 HoursBaseline and at 48-72 hours
The Investigator made an assessment of clinical response at the 48-72 Hour Visit based on following definition: Improving (Improvement in overall clinical status of ABSSSI compatible with continuation of study drug therapy); Stable (Signs and symptoms stable, no apparent change in overall clinical status but compatible with continuation of study drug therapy); Other.
SecondaryInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response at Day 7 VisitBaseline and Day 7 visit
The Investigator made an assessment of clinical response at Day 7 Visit based on following definition: Improving (Improvement in overall clinical status of ABSSSI compatible with continuation of study drug therapy); Other.
SecondaryValue of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Each Time PointUp to EOT visit (Day 11)
The patient-reported level of pain were assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. VAS pain score ranged from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain ever). It used a 100 mm VAS to instruct the patient to indicate the point along the line that represents the pain they are feeling. Once the patient indicates how much pain they are feeling, measure the distance from no pain and enter the value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Each Time PointUp to EOT visit (Day 11)
The patient-reported level of pain were assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. VAS pain score ranged from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain ever). It used a 100 mm VAS to instruct the patient to indicate the point along the line that represents the pain they are feeling. Once the patient indicates how much pain they are feeling, measure the distance from no pain and enter the value.
SecondaryValue of the Faces Rating Scale (FRS) Pain Scores at Each Time PointUp to EOT visit (Day 11)
The patient-reported level of pain were assessed by the faces rating scale (FRS) pain score. Ask the patient to rate their pain from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain then enter the numerical value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Faces Rating Scale (FRS) Pain Scores at Each Time PointUp to EOT visit (Day 11)
The patient-reported level of pain were assessed by the faces rating scale (FRS) pain score. The patient-reported level of pain were assessed by the faces rating scale (FRS) pain score. Ask the patient to rate their pain from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst pain then enter the numerical value.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02066402/registered