ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02073279

Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

NCT02073279, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2020-12-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). Trials, record NCT02073279. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02073279

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
NCT number
NCT02073279
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
95 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO), NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
Interventions
Satralizumab, Placebo
First posted
2014-02-27
Last updated
2023-03-01
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2015-005431-41
Results first posted
2020-12-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes32

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTime to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) PeriodUp to Week 216
TFR was defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of relapse in the DB period. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Symptoms had to persist for \>24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred \< 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onset days that were 30 days of one another, they were counted only as 1 relapse), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB PeriodBaseline, Week 24
The VAS is a subjective measure of pain consisting of a 100 mm line with two endpoints representing 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "pain as bad as it could be". Participants rated their pain by placing a mark on the line corresponding to their current level of pain. The distance along the line from the "no pain" marker was measured with a ruler giving a pain score out of 100. A higher score indicated more pain and lower scores reflected a better health state. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. ANCOVA was used for analysis to report the adjusted mean and standard error (SE).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB PeriodBaseline, Week 24
The FACIT Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the past 7 days. As each of the 13 items of the scale ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores was computed using FACIT scoring algorithm as 0-52, where 0 is the worst possible score and 52 the best which indicated less fatigue. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
SecondaryRelapse-Free Rate During the DB PeriodUp to Week 216
Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Symptoms had to persist for \>24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred \< 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onsets within 30 days of one another, they were counted as 1), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.
SecondaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the DB PeriodUp to Week 216
The ARR is calculated as the total number of participants with adjudicated PDRs experienced divided by the patient-years at risk. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological NMO or NMOSD. Symptoms had to persist for \>24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred \< 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (2 relapses with onset days in 30 days of one another was counted as 1 relapse), onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short Form Generic Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SF-36 General Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Emotional Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Outcomes32

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTime to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) PeriodUp to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. For participants who had not relapsed, the TFR was censored on the date of end of the DB period.weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB PeriodBaseline, Week 24
ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. Missing data were imputed by BOCF method.
score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB PeriodBaseline, Week 24
ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. Missing data was imputed using BOCF method
score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYRelapse-Free Rate During the DB PeriodUp to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the DB PeriodUp to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups.patients w PDRs/patient-years at riskNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Short Form Generic Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SF-36 General Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Emotional Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB PeriodBaseline up to Week 216ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.score on scaleMEAN

Results by group804

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) PeriodPlacebo, Then Satralizumab128.395% Confidence Interval 29.9 to NAweeks
Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) PeriodSatralizumab, Then SatralizumabNA95% Confidence Interval 135.7 to NAweeks
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB PeriodPlacebo, Then SatralizumabBaseline27.563Standard Error 5.438score on scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB PeriodSatralizumab, Then SatralizumabBaseline31.661Standard Error 3.665score on scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB PeriodPlacebo, Then SatralizumabChange from Baseline to Week 24-5.949Standard Error 4.832score on scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB PeriodSatralizumab, Then SatralizumabChange from Baseline to Week 24-2.735Standard Error 4.260score on scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB PeriodPlacebo, Then SatralizumabBaseline29.656Standard Error 2.280score on scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB PeriodSatralizumab, Then SatralizumabBaseline30.590Standard Error 1.492score on scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB PeriodPlacebo, Then SatralizumabChange from Baseline to Week 243.602Standard Error 1.820score on scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB PeriodSatralizumab, Then SatralizumabChange from Baseline to Week 245.709Standard Error 1.610score on scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo, Then Satralizumab32
Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDSatralizumab, Then Satralizumab63
Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Satralizumab28
Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDSatralizumab, Then Satralizumab56
Double-blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Satralizumab4
Double-blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDSatralizumab, Then Satralizumab7
Open-label Extension PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo, Then Satralizumab28
Open-label Extension PeriodSTARTEDSatralizumab, Then Satralizumab56
Open-label Extension PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Satralizumab21
Open-label Extension PeriodCOMPLETEDSatralizumab, Then Satralizumab41

Adverse events400

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Double Blind Period13210
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSA237 Double Blind Period4635
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Open Label Period2283
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSA237 Open Label Period1561
otherVision blurredEye disordersPlacebo Double Blind Period2322
otherVision blurredEye disordersSA237 Double Blind Period1631
otherVision blurredEye disordersPlacebo Open Label Period0280
otherVision blurredEye disordersSA237 Open Label Period1561
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Double Blind Period2323
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersSA237 Double Blind Period1631

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Double Blind Period032
Total, all-cause mortalitySA237 Double Blind Period063
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Open Label Period028
Total, all-cause mortalitySA237 Open Label Period056
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Double Blind Period2332
Total, other adverse eventsSA237 Double Blind Period5763
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Open Label Period2328
Total, other adverse eventsSA237 Open Label Period4256
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Double Blind Period532
Total, serious adverse eventsSA237 Double Blind Period1263

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32333898DERIVEDPubMed
36007339DERIVEDPubMed
36724181DERIVEDPubMed
40288333DERIVEDPubMed
40743487DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab vs Placebo, Then Satralizumab: Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest in the DB PeriodTrial comparisons
Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab vs Placebo, Then Satralizumab: Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event in the DB PeriodTrial comparisons
Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab vs Placebo, Then Satralizumab: Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event in the DB PeriodTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02073279

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02073279/registered?page=2