Trial ยท NCT02073279
Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
NCT02073279, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2020-12-31
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). Trials, record NCT02073279. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02073279
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Monotherapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
- NCT number
- NCT02073279
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 95 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Conditions
- Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO), NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
- Interventions
- Satralizumab, Placebo
- First posted
- 2014-02-27
- Last updated
- 2023-03-01
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2015-005431-41
- Results first posted
- 2020-12-31
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes32
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) Period | Up to Week 216 | TFR was defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of relapse in the DB period. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Symptoms had to persist for \>24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred \< 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onset days that were 30 days of one another, they were counted only as 1 relapse), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB Period | Baseline, Week 24 | The VAS is a subjective measure of pain consisting of a 100 mm line with two endpoints representing 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "pain as bad as it could be". Participants rated their pain by placing a mark on the line corresponding to their current level of pain. The distance along the line from the "no pain" marker was measured with a ruler giving a pain score out of 100. A higher score indicated more pain and lower scores reflected a better health state. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. ANCOVA was used for analysis to report the adjusted mean and standard error (SE). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB Period | Baseline, Week 24 | The FACIT Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the past 7 days. As each of the 13 items of the scale ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores was computed using FACIT scoring algorithm as 0-52, where 0 is the worst possible score and 52 the best which indicated less fatigue. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. |
| Secondary | Relapse-Free Rate During the DB Period | Up to Week 216 | Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Symptoms had to persist for \>24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred \< 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onsets within 30 days of one another, they were counted as 1), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse. |
| Secondary | Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the DB Period | Up to Week 216 | The ARR is calculated as the total number of participants with adjudicated PDRs experienced divided by the patient-years at risk. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological NMO or NMOSD. Symptoms had to persist for \>24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred \< 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (2 relapses with onset days in 30 days of one another was counted as 1 relapse), onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Short Form Generic Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in SF-36 General Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Emotional Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. |
1 to 10 of 32Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 32 registered outcomesOutcomes32
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) Period | Up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. For participants who had not relapsed, the TFR was censored on the date of end of the DB period. | weeks | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB Period | Baseline, Week 24 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. Missing data were imputed by BOCF method. | score on scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB Period | Baseline, Week 24 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. Missing data was imputed using BOCF method | score on scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Relapse-Free Rate During the DB Period | Up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the DB Period | Up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. | patients w PDRs/patient-years at risk | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Short Form Generic Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | score on scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in SF-36 General Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | score on scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | score on scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | score on scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Emotional Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period | Baseline up to Week 216 | ITT population included all participants randomized to the treatment groups. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | score on scale | MEAN |
1 to 10 of 32Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 32 outcomesResults by group804
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) Period | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | 128.3 | 95% Confidence Interval 29.9 to NA | weeks | |
| Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) During the Double-Blind (DB) Period | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | NA | 95% Confidence Interval 135.7 to NA | weeks | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB Period | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | Baseline | 27.563 | Standard Error 5.438 | score on scale |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB Period | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | Baseline | 31.661 | Standard Error 3.665 | score on scale |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB Period | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | Change from Baseline to Week 24 | -5.949 | Standard Error 4.832 | score on scale |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain During the DB Period | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | Change from Baseline to Week 24 | -2.735 | Standard Error 4.260 | score on scale |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB Period | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | Baseline | 29.656 | Standard Error 2.280 | score on scale |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB Period | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | Baseline | 30.590 | Standard Error 1.492 | score on scale |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB Period | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | Change from Baseline to Week 24 | 3.602 | Standard Error 1.820 | score on scale |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale During the DB Period | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | Change from Baseline to Week 24 | 5.709 | Standard Error 1.610 | score on scale |
1 to 10 of 804Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 804 results by groupParticipant flow12
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-blind Period | STARTED | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | 32 | |
| Double-blind Period | STARTED | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | 63 | |
| Double-blind Period | COMPLETED | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | 28 | |
| Double-blind Period | COMPLETED | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | 56 | |
| Double-blind Period | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | 4 | |
| Double-blind Period | NOT COMPLETED | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | 7 | |
| Open-label Extension Period | STARTED | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | 28 | |
| Open-label Extension Period | STARTED | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | 56 | |
| Open-label Extension Period | COMPLETED | Placebo, Then Satralizumab | 21 | |
| Open-label Extension Period | COMPLETED | Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab | 41 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 participant flowAdverse events400
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Placebo Double Blind Period | 1 | 32 | 10 |
| other | Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | SA237 Double Blind Period | 4 | 63 | 5 |
| other | Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Placebo Open Label Period | 2 | 28 | 3 |
| other | Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | SA237 Open Label Period | 1 | 56 | 1 |
| other | Vision blurred | Eye disorders | Placebo Double Blind Period | 2 | 32 | 2 |
| other | Vision blurred | Eye disorders | SA237 Double Blind Period | 1 | 63 | 1 |
| other | Vision blurred | Eye disorders | Placebo Open Label Period | 0 | 28 | 0 |
| other | Vision blurred | Eye disorders | SA237 Open Label Period | 1 | 56 | 1 |
| other | Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo Double Blind Period | 2 | 32 | 3 |
| other | Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | SA237 Double Blind Period | 1 | 63 | 1 |
1 to 10 of 400Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 400 adverse eventsAdverse event totals12
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo Double Blind Period | 0 | 32 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | SA237 Double Blind Period | 0 | 63 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo Open Label Period | 0 | 28 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | SA237 Open Label Period | 0 | 56 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo Double Blind Period | 23 | 32 |
| Total, other adverse events | SA237 Double Blind Period | 57 | 63 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo Open Label Period | 23 | 28 |
| Total, other adverse events | SA237 Open Label Period | 42 | 56 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo Double Blind Period | 5 | 32 |
| Total, serious adverse events | SA237 Double Blind Period | 12 | 63 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 adverse event totalsPapers5
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons3
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab vs Placebo, Then Satralizumab: Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest in the DB Period | Trial comparisons |
| Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab vs Placebo, Then Satralizumab: Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event in the DB Period | Trial comparisons |
| Satralizumab, Then Satralizumab vs Placebo, Then Satralizumab: Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event in the DB Period | Trial comparisons |
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02073279
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02073279/registered?page=2