ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02080403

The Efficacy and Safety of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Chip (PerioChip®) in Therapy of Peri-implantitis

NCT02080403, Phase 3, Completed, Dexcel Pharma Technologies Ltd.; results first posted 2021-06-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Efficacy and Safety of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Chip (PerioChip®) in Therapy of Peri-implantitis. Trials, record NCT02080403. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02080403

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Efficacy and Safety of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Chip (PerioChip®) in Therapy of Peri-implantitis
NCT number
NCT02080403
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
290 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Dexcel Pharma Technologies Ltd.
Conditions
Peri-Implantitis
Interventions
2.5 mg Chlorhexidine gluconate chip
First posted
2014-03-06
Last updated
2022-09-13
Results first posted
2021-06-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAbsolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth for Selected Target ImplantsBaseline to 6 months
Pocket depth was measured as the distance from the coronal edge of the gingival margin to the base of the pocket. It was assessed at 4 sites per implant: mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual. Only one of the 4 sites, usually the deepest, was determine to be target implant.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth of Selected Target Implants in Patients With Baseline Pocket Depth Measurement of 6-8 mm InclusiveBaseline to 6 months
Pocket depth was measured as the distance from the coronal edge of the gingival margin to the base of the pocket. It was assessed at 4 sites per implant: mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual. Only one of the 4 sites, usually the deepest, was determine to be target implant.
SecondaryPercentage of Selected Target Implants Bleeding on Probing (BOP)6 monthsThe proportion of the change in bleeding status (bleeding to no bleeding) for the selected target implant
SecondaryPrecentage of Selected Target Implant BOPWeek 16The proportion of change in bleeding status (bleeding to no bleeding) for selected target implant

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAbsolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth for Selected Target ImplantsBaseline to 6 monthsIntent to TreatmmMEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth of Selected Target Implants in Patients With Baseline Pocket Depth Measurement of 6-8 mm InclusiveBaseline to 6 monthsIntent to TreatmmMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Selected Target Implants Bleeding on Probing (BOP)6 monthsIntent to TreatTarget implantCOUNT_OF_UNITS
SECONDARYPrecentage of Selected Target Implant BOPWeek 16Target implantCOUNT_OF_UNITS

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Absolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth for Selected Target ImplantsTreatment-1.69Standard Deviation 1.18mm
Absolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth for Selected Target ImplantsControl-1.51Standard Deviation 1.16mm
Absolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth of Selected Target Implants in Patients With Baseline Pocket Depth Measurement of 6-8 mm InclusiveTreatment-1.77Standard Deviation 1.25mm
Absolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth of Selected Target Implants in Patients With Baseline Pocket Depth Measurement of 6-8 mm InclusiveControl-1.65Standard Deviation 1.18mm
Percentage of Selected Target Implants Bleeding on Probing (BOP)Treatment90Target implant
Percentage of Selected Target Implants Bleeding on Probing (BOP)Control77Target implant
Precentage of Selected Target Implant BOPTreatment76Target implant
Precentage of Selected Target Implant BOPControl73Target implant

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment146
Overall StudySTARTEDControl144
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment131
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl132
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl12

Adverse events36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherImplant site painGeneral disordersTreatment12146
otherImplant site painGeneral disordersControl0144
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsTreatment5146
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsControl7144
otherPost procedural discomfortInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsTreatment5146
otherPost procedural discomfortInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsControl1144
otherTooth repairSurgical and medical proceduresTreatment3146
otherTooth repairSurgical and medical proceduresControl2144
otherAphthous ulcerGastrointestinal disordersTreatment3146
otherAphthous ulcerGastrointestinal disordersControl1144

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment0146
Total, all-cause mortalityControl2144
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment43146
Total, other adverse eventsControl19144
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment4146
Total, serious adverse eventsControl3144

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Treatment vs Control: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Treatment vs Control: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02080403

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02080403/events?page=2