ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02091375

Antiepileptic Efficacy Study of GWP42003-P in Children and Young Adults With Dravet Syndrome (GWPCARE1)

NCT02091375, Phase 3, Completed, Jazz Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2018-07-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Antiepileptic Efficacy Study of GWP42003-P in Children and Young Adults With Dravet Syndrome (GWPCARE1). Trials, record NCT02091375. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02091375

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Antiepileptic Efficacy Study of GWP42003-P in Children and Young Adults With Dravet Syndrome (GWPCARE1)
NCT number
NCT02091375
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
120 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Epilepsy, Dravet Syndrome
Interventions
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day Dose, Placebo control
First posted
2014-03-19
Last updated
2022-09-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-002941-23
Results first posted
2018-07-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage Change From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to End of Treatment (EOT) (Day 99) or Early Termination (ET)
Convulsive seizures (atonic, clonic, tonic, or tonic-clonic) were recorded by the participant or caregiver using an interactive voice response system (IVRS) diary. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as: (\[frequency during the treatment period - frequency during baseline\]/frequency during baseline) \* 100. The frequency during each period was based on 28-day averages and calculated as: (number of seizures in the period/number of reported days in the IVRS period) \* 28. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average). Negative percentages show an improvement from baseline.
SecondaryNumber Of Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
Convulsive seizures (atonic, clonic, tonic, or tonic-clonic) were recorded by the participant or caregiver using an IVRS diary. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
Convulsive seizures (atonic, clonic, tonic, or tonic-clonic) were recorded by the participant or caregiver using an IVRS diary. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline In Non-Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
Non-convulsive seizures (myoclonic, partial, or absence) were recorded by the participant or caregiver using an IVRS diary. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure. Only participants with non-convulsive seizures during the baseline period were included. Negative percentages show an improvement from baseline.
SecondaryCaregiver Global Impression Of Change In Seizure Duration (CGICSD)Baseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
Seizure duration was assessed qualitatively using the CGICSD. Caregivers were asked "Since the patient started treatment, please assess the average duration of the patient's seizures (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment)"; responses included decrease, no change, or increase in average duration. For each seizure type, only participants with at least 1 seizure for the corresponding seizure type, reported at any time during the study, were included.
SecondaryNumber Of Participants Using Rescue MedicationBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ETThe use of rescue medication was recorded by the participant or caregiver using a paper diary.
SecondaryNumber Of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due To EpilepsyBaseline to Safety Follow-up (Day 137)Inpatient hospitalizations due to epilepsy were recorded by the participant or caregiver and through the serious adverse events (SAE) reporting process.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Sleep Disruption 0 To 10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 to 10 NRS) ScoreBaseline to Last Visit (Day 99) or ET
The sleep disruption 0 to 10 NRS questionnaire was completed by the participant's caregiver. The caregiver was asked 'On a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your child's sleep disruption in the last week.' The markers ranged from 0 = 'slept extremely well' to 10 = 'unable to sleep at all'. The change from baseline in the sleep disruption 0 to 10 numerical rating scale score was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with baseline and age group (2 to 5 years, 6 to 12 years and 13 to 18 years) as covariates and treatment group as a fixed factor. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement in sleep. Last visit for endpoints assessed at clinic visits was defined as the last scheduled visit (not including the end of taper or safety follow-up visits) at which participant's last evaluation was performed.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreBaseline to Last Visit (Day 99) or ET
The ESS questionnaire was completed by the participant's caregiver. The change from baseline in the ESS score was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline and age group (2 to 5 years, 6- to 2 years and 13 to 18 years) as covariates and treatment group as a fixed factor. The total score was the sum of the 8 item-scores and ranged from 0 to 24. A higher total score represents greater levels of daytime sleepiness.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Quality Of Life In Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) ScoreBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
The QOLCE questionnaire was completed by the parent or caregiver of participants aged 4 years and above. The change from baseline in the overall quality of life score was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline and age group (2 to 5 years, 6 to 12 years and 13 to 18 years) as covariates and treatment group as a fixed factor. Zero represents the lowest or poorest category and 100 represents the highest level of functioning. The overall quality of life score was calculated by taking the mean of the subscale scores.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage Change From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to End of Treatment (EOT) (Day 99) or Early Termination (ET)
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber Of Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline In Non-Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYCaregiver Global Impression Of Change In Seizure Duration (CGICSD)Baseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber Of Participants Using Rescue MedicationBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ETSafety Analysis Set: included all participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the actual treatment they received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber Of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due To EpilepsyBaseline to Safety Follow-up (Day 137)
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Sleep Disruption 0 To 10 Numerical Rating Scale (0 to 10 NRS) ScoreBaseline to Last Visit (Day 99) or ET
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreBaseline to Last Visit (Day 99) or ET
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Quality Of Life In Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) ScoreBaseline to EOT (Day 99) or ET
ITT analysis set: included all participants in the Part B safety analysis set who had post-baseline efficacy data. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized. The ITT analysis set was the primary analysis set for all efficacy outcome measures.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group98

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage Change From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose-38.94Inter-Quartile Range -69.53 to -4.83percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodPlacebo-13.29Inter-Quartile Range -52.53 to 20.20percent change
Number Of Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose26Participants
Number Of Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodPlacebo16Participants
Number of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose≥25% Reduction38Participants
Number of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodPlacebo≥25% Reduction26Participants
Number of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose≥75% Reduction14Participants
Number of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodPlacebo≥75% Reduction7Participants
Number of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose100% Reduction3Participants
Number of Participants With A ≥25%, ≥75% Or 100% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodPlacebo100% Reduction0Participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose61
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo59
Overall StudySafety Analysis SetGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose61
Overall StudySafety Analysis SetPlacebo59
Overall StudyIntention to Treat (ITT) Analysis SetGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose61
Overall StudyIntention to Treat (ITT) Analysis SetPlacebo59
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose52
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo56
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo3

Adverse events80

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose1961
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo659
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose961
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo359
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose961
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPlacebo559
otherFatigueGeneral disordersGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose1161
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo259
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose761
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo559

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose4661
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2859
Total, serious adverse eventsGWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose1061
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo359

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
28538134BACKGROUNDPubMed
34265088DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose vs Placebo: Number Of Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment PeriodTrial comparisons
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose vs Placebo: Number Of Participants Using Rescue MedicationTrial comparisons
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02091375

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02091375/results?page=2