ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02108652

A Study of Atezolizumab in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer (Cohort 2)

NCT02108652, Phase 2, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2017-01-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Atezolizumab in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer (Cohort 2). Trials, record NCT02108652. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02108652

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Atezolizumab in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer (Cohort 2)
NCT number
NCT02108652
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
310 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Interventions
Atezolizumab
First posted
2014-04-09
Last updated
2024-03-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-005486-39
Results first posted
2017-01-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR as Assessed by the Investigator According Modified RECIST
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new measurable or unmeasurable lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR. The percentage of participants with a confirmed objective response of CR or PR was reported. The exact 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or progressive disease (PD) was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
SecondaryDOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and (if applicable) normalization of tumor marker levels. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
SecondaryDOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
DOR was defined as the time from the initial occurrence of documented CR or PR (whichever occurred first) until documented disease progression or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new measurable or unmeasurable lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to Baseline sum LD. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Response was to be confirmed ≥4 weeks after the initial assessment of CR or PR.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.
SecondaryPFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first event of death or PD. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD, or the appearance of new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. Disease progression or PD was defined as ≥20% increase in sum LD in reference to the smallest on-study sum LD. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD was reported.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 objective response-evaluable population included Intent-to-treat (ITT) participants who had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 at baseline. Cohort 2 ITT population included all participants from Cohort 2 who received any amount of study drug.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR as Assessed by the Investigator According Modified RECIST
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 objective response-evaluable population.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 objective response-evaluable population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 objective response-evaluable population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 objective response-evaluable population. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 ITT populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 ITT populationmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 ITT populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 ITT populationmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECIST
Baseline until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, thereafter every 12 weeks until data cutoff date 04 July 2016, up to maximum length of follow-up of 24.48 months)
Cohort 2 ITT populationpercentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group22

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Facility (IRF) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments15.895% Confidence Interval 11.9 to 20.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Objective Response of CR or PR as Assessed by the Investigator According Modified RECISTCohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments19.795% Confidence Interval 15.4 to 24.6percentage of participants
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond TreatmentsNAFull Range 2.1 to NAmonths
DOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments20.50Full Range 2.1 to 20.5months
DOR as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECISTCohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments20.50Full Range 2.1 to 20.5months
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments88.4percentage of participants
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the IRF According to RECIST v1.1Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments2.1095% Confidence Interval 2.07 to 2.14months
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments89.7percentage of participants
PFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST v1.1Cohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments2.1095% Confidence Interval 2.07 to 2.14months
Percentage of Participants With Death or Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator According to Modified RECISTCohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments87.1percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments310
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCohort 2: Participants With Second-line or Beyond Treatments310

Adverse events198

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION5631072
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION4431054
otherCONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION85310102
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION69310103
otherDRY MOUTHGastrointestinal disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION2431025
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION86310114
otherVOMITINGGastrointestinal disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION6131083
otherASTHENIAGeneral disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION2331037
otherCHILLSGeneral disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION3431037
otherFATIGUEGeneral disordersMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION164310228

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION253310
Total, other adverse eventsMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION287310
Total, serious adverse eventsMPDL3280A COHORT2 INFUSION155310

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26952546DERIVEDPubMed
27939400DERIVEDPubMed
28552987DERIVEDPubMed
28950298DERIVEDPubMed
29273410DERIVEDPubMed
29489427DERIVEDPubMed
33241650DERIVEDPubMed
35410325DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02108652

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02108652/results?page=2