ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02109939

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) Score From Baseline to 8 Weeksfrom baseline to end of Week 8
Evaluate the impact of GeneSight Psychotropic on response to psychotropic treatment as judged by the mean percent change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) score from baseline to end of Week 8 of the study. Scores range from 0 to 50, and lower scores are better outcomes. Percent change is defined as (week 8 score -baseline score) / (baseline score) x 100.
SecondaryPercent Change in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology (QIDS-C16) Score From Baseline to 8 Weeksfrom baseline to end of Week 8
Mean percent change in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology (QIDS-C16) score from baseline to end of Week 8 of the study. Scores range from 0 to 27 with lower scores being better outcomes. Percent change is defined as (week 8 score - baseline score) / (baseline score) x 100.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 8 for HAM-D17Week 8 visit info
Adjusted percentage of responders at Week 8 in each treatment group on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17). A responder is defined as a participant with at least a 50% decrease from baseline in total scale score. Scores range from 0 to 50, and lower scores are better outcomes.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 12 for HAM-D17Week 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters at Week 12 Defined as HAM-D17 ≤7week 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters at Week 8 Defined as HAM-D17 ≤7 Each Treatment Group;week 8 visit info
Adjusted percentage of remitters at Week 8 defined as a score ≤7 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) in each treatment group. Scores range from 0 to 50, and lower scores are better outcomes.
SecondaryTime to Response/Remission of Depressive Symptoms Over 8 Weeks;week 4 and 8 visit info
\*Comment\*: Time to response/remission is not an outcome measure that can accurately be reported from the way the data was collected. As specified in the updated SAP before the blind was broken, this was not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercent Change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) Score From Baseline to 24 WeeksBaseline to week 24 visits
Evaluate the impact of GeneSight Psychotropic on response to psychotropic treatment as judged by the mean percent change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) score from baseline to end of Week 24 of the study. Scores range from 0 to 50, and lower scores are better outcomes. Percent change is defined as (week 24 score -baseline score) / (baseline score) x 100.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 8 for QIDS-C16Week 8 visit info
Adjusted percentage of responders at Week 8 in each treatment group on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology (QIDS-C16). A responder is defined as a participant with at least 50% decrease from baseline in total scale score. Scores range from 0 to 27 with lower scores being better outcomes.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 8 for PHQ-9Week 8 visit info
Adjusted percentage of responders at Week 8 in each treatment group on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). A responder is defined as a participant with at least 50% decrease from baseline in total scale score. Scores range from 0 to 27 with lower scores being better outcomes.
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters at Week 12 Defined as QIDS-C16 ≤5week 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters at Week 12 Defined as PHQ-9 <5week 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters at Week 12 Defined as CGI-S ≤1week 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 12 for QIDS-C16Week 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 12 for PHQ-9Week 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 12 for CGI-SWeek 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 12 for CGI-IWeek 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at Week 12 for CGI-EIWeek 12 visit info
\*Comment\*: For patients in TAU, clinicians were blinded to the pharmacogenomic test result until after completion of the week 8 visit. Because unblinding might have occurred for some patients prior to week 12 assessments, data collected at week 12 were no longer considered blinded and are not analyzed or reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters at Week 8 Defined as QIDS-C16 ≤ 5 in Each Treatment Groupweek 8 visit info
Adjusted percentage of remitters at Week 8 in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomology (QIDS-C16) in each treatment group. A remitter is defined as a subject with a score ≤ 5. Scores range from 0 to 27 with lower scores being better outcomes.
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters at Week 8 Defined as PHQ-9 <5 in Each Treatment Groupweek 8 visit info
Adjusted percentage of remitters at Week 8 in each treatment group on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). A remitter is defined as a participant with score \<5 on the PHQ-9. Scores range from 0 to 27 with lower scores being better outcomes.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02109939/registered