ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02117479

Study of Ruxolitinib in Pancreatic Cancer Patients (Janus 1)

NCT02117479, Phase 3, Terminated, Incyte Corporation; results first posted 2017-07-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Ruxolitinib in Pancreatic Cancer Patients (Janus 1). Trials, record NCT02117479. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02117479

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Ruxolitinib in Pancreatic Cancer Patients (Janus 1)
NCT number
NCT02117479
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
321 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Conditions
Pancreatic Cancer
Interventions
Ruxolitinib, Placebo, Capecitabine
First posted
2014-04-21
Last updated
2019-03-26
Results first posted
2017-07-11
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated as other related studies of ruxolitinib did not provide sufficient efficacy to warrant continuation at the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)Randomization until death due to any cause; up to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.Overall survival is reported here based on the number of deaths from randomization up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Progressive Disease (PD) is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression determined by investigator assessment of objective radiographic disease assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death due to any cause if sooner. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)Baseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Objective response rate determined by radiographic disease assessments per RECIST (v1.1), by investigator assessment and was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) at any post baseline visit. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) for target lesions and assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions with no worsening of non-target lesions and no new lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
SecondaryDuration of ResponseBaseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Duration of overall response was defined as the time in months from Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) until the first date Progressive Disease (PD) was objectively documented or until the date of death.
SecondaryParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline through approximately 30 days post treatment discontinuation; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an event occurring after exposure to at least 1 dose of study drug (ruxolitinib or placebo). A treatment-related AE was defined as an event with a definite, probable, or possible causality to study medication. A serious AE is an event resulting in death, hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes above. The intensity of an AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe); Grade 4 (life-threatening).

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)Randomization until death due to any cause; up to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants randomized to the study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants randomized to the study.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants randomized to the study.percentage of participantsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR)Baseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants randomized to the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of ResponseBaseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants randomized to the study.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline through approximately 30 days post treatment discontinuation; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.The safety evaluable population consisted of all participants exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug (ruxolitinib or placebo).ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Ruxolitinib Plus CapecitabineObserved113Participants
Overall Survival (OS)Placebo Plus CapecitabineObserved124Participants
Overall Survival (OS)Ruxolitinib Plus CapecitabineCensored48Participants
Overall Survival (OS)Placebo Plus CapecitabineCensored36Participants
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Ruxolitinib Plus Capecitabine43.095% Confidence Interval 41.0 to 46.0days
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Placebo Plus Capecitabine44.095% Confidence Interval 42.0 to 48.0days
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)Ruxolitinib Plus CapecitabineSurvival rate at 3 months18.995% Confidence Interval 12.7 to 25.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)Placebo Plus CapecitabineSurvival rate at 3 months19.895% Confidence Interval 13.6 to 26.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)Ruxolitinib Plus CapecitabineSurvival rate at 6 months6.195% Confidence Interval 2.5 to 12.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)Placebo Plus CapecitabineSurvival rate at 6 months5.795% Confidence Interval 2.3 to 11.3percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine161
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Plus Capecitabine160
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine5
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Plus Capecitabine4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine156
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Plus Capecitabine156

Adverse events388

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine45153
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Plus Capecitabine49154
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine45153
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Plus Capecitabine22154
otherFatigueGeneral disordersRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine47153
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo Plus Capecitabine50154
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine42153
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Plus Capecitabine36154
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine36153
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Plus Capecitabine49154

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Plus Capecitabine
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine147153
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Plus Capecitabine145154
Total, serious adverse eventsRuxolitinib Plus Capecitabine94153
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Plus Capecitabine83154

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29508247DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Ruxolitinib Plus Capecitabine vs Placebo Plus Capecitabine: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02117479

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02117479/results?page=2