ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02118792

Safety and Efficacy of AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% in Children, Adolescents, and Adults (Aged 2 Years and Older) With Atopic Dermatitis

NCT02118792, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2017-03-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% in Children, Adolescents, and Adults (Aged 2 Years and Older) With Atopic Dermatitis. Trials, record NCT02118792. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02118792

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% in Children, Adolescents, and Adults (Aged 2 Years and Older) With Atopic Dermatitis
NCT number
NCT02118792
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
764 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Dermatitis, Atopic
Interventions
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2%, Matching vehicle control
First posted
2014-04-21
Last updated
2017-03-06
Results first posted
2017-03-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Success in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score at Day 29Day 29
ISGA assessed the severity of AD (except scalp) on a 5-point scale ranged from 0 (clear) to 4 (maximum severe), where higher scores indicate higher degree of AD. Grades for classification of severity: 0= clear (minor residual hypo/hyper pigmentation, no erythema or induration or papulation, no oozing or crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration or papulation and no oozing or crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration or papulation with or without oozing or crusting) and 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration or papulation and with oozing or crusting). Treatment success was defined as an ISGA score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 29, SAEs: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 36
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; Initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug to the end of study, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Day 8Baseline, Day 8
ECG parameters that were analyzed: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and corrected QT interval based on Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Clinical significance of change from baseline in ECG findings was determined by investigator.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Day 36Baseline (Day 1), Day 36
Following parameters were analyzed for examination of vital signs: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate and body temperature. Vital sign measurements were performed with the participant in the seated or supine position and after the participant had been calmly sitting or lying face up for a minimum of 5 minutes. Clinical significance of change from baseline value was determined by investigator.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory ValuesBaseline up to Day 36
Laboratory values included: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Albumin, Bilirubin, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets, Basophils, Eosinophils, Erythrocytes, Potassium, Protein, Sodium. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were defined as abnormal laboratory test values that have clinical manifestations or require medical intervention, as per investigator's discretion.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Tolerability Symptoms at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)
Local tolerability symptoms (burning/stinging) were assessed in participants at sites of study drug application. Symptoms were assessed on 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 = none (no stinging/burning), 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling sensation); 2= moderate (definite warm; tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome and severe); 3= severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. Percentage of participants with each level of local tolerability (none, mild, moderate, severe) symptoms were reported.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Tolerability Symptoms at Day 8Day 8
Local tolerability symptoms (burning/stinging) were assessed in participants at sites of study drug application. Symptoms were assessed on 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0= none (no stinging/burning), 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling sensation); 2= moderate (definite warm; tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome and severe); 3= severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. Percentage of participants with each level of local tolerability (none, mild, moderate, severe) symptoms were reported.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Tolerability Symptoms at Day 15Day 15
Local tolerability symptoms (burning/stinging) were assessed in participants at sites of study drug application. Symptoms were assessed on 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0= none (no stinging/burning), 1= mild (slight warm, tingling sensation); 2= moderate (definite warm; tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome and severe); 3= severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. Percentage of participants with each level of local tolerability (none, mild, moderate, severe) symptoms were reported.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Tolerability Symptoms at Day 22Day 22
Local tolerability symptoms (burning/stinging) were assessed in participants at sites of study drug application. Symptoms were assessed on 4-point scale which ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 = none (no stinging/burning), 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling sensation); 2= moderate (definite warm; tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome and severe); 3= severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort). Higher scores indicate high severity of symptoms. In this outcome, percentage of participants with each level of local tolerability (none, mild, moderate, severe) symptoms were reported.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Local Tolerability Symptoms at Day 29Day 29
Local tolerability symptoms (burning/stinging) were assessed in participants at sites of study drug application. Symptoms were assessed on 4-point scale which ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 = none (no stinging/burning), 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling sensation); 2= moderate (definite warm; tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome and severe); 3= severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that caused definite discomfort). Higher scores indicate high severity of symptoms. Percentage of participants with each level of local tolerability (none, mild, moderate, severe) symptoms were reported.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Success in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score at Day 29Day 29ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 29, SAEs: Baseline (Day 1) up to Day 36Safety population included all randomized participants who had at least 1 confirmed dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Day 8Baseline, Day 8Safety population included all randomized participants who had at least 1 confirmed dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Day 36Baseline (Day 1), Day 36Safety population included all randomized participants who had at least 1 confirmed dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory ValuesBaseline up to Day 36Safety population included all randomized participants who had at least 1 confirmed dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Local Tolerability Symptoms at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)
Safety population included all randomized participants who had at least 1 confirmed dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Here, number of participants analyzed (N) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Day 29Day 29ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Achieve Treatment Success Based on Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA)Baseline up to Day 29ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Signs of Atopic Dermatitis at Day 29Baseline, Day 29ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable at specific time point for each arm.units on a scaleMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDTime to Improvement in PruritusBaseline (Day 1) up to Day 29ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug. Here, N'' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.daysMEDIAN

Results by group98

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Success in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score at Day 29AN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)31.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Success in Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score at Day 29AN2728 Ointment, Vehicle18.0percentage of participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)AEs150participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AN2728 Ointment, VehicleAEs79participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)SAEs3participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AN2728 Ointment, VehicleSAEs0participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Day 8AN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)0participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Day 8AN2728 Ointment, Vehicle0participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Day 36AN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)0participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Day 36AN2728 Ointment, Vehicle0participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)514
Overall StudySTARTEDAN2728 Ointment, Vehicle250
Overall StudyTreatedAN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)513
Overall StudyTreatedAN2728 Ointment, Vehicle250
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)483
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAN2728 Ointment, Vehicle213
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%)31
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAN2728 Ointment, Vehicle37

Adverse events36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)6510
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle2247
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)7510
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle2247
otherApplication site painGeneral disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)14510
otherApplication site painGeneral disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle3247
otherApplication site pruritusGeneral disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)1510
otherApplication site pruritusGeneral disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle3247
otherApplication site urticariaGeneral disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)0510
otherApplication site urticariaGeneral disordersAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle3247

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)
Total, all-cause mortalityAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle
Total, other adverse eventsAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)92510
Total, other adverse eventsAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle54247
Total, serious adverse eventsAN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%)3510
Total, serious adverse eventsAN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle0247

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27417017DERIVEDPubMed
30345457DERIVEDPubMed
32318744DERIVEDPubMed
32574023DERIVEDPubMed
33728583DERIVEDPubMed
34379285DERIVEDPubMed
35292919DERIVEDPubMed
38206678DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
AN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%) vs AN2728 Ointment, Vehicle: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Day 36Trial comparisons
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%) vs AN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory ValuesTrial comparisons
AN2728 Ointment, 2 Percent (%) vs AN2728 Ointment, Vehicle: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Day 8Trial comparisons
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2 Percent (%) vs AN2728 Topical Ointment, Vehicle: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02118792

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02118792/results?page=2