Relative Patient Benefits of a Hospital-PCMH Collaboration Within an ACO to Improve Care Transitions
Trial · NCT02130570
Results by group34
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
1 to 20 of 34
Download this page as JSON| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants With an Adverse Event Within 30 Days After Index Discharge Date | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | 0.18 | 95% Confidence Interval 0.15 to 0.21 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With an Adverse Event Within 30 Days After Index Discharge Date | Usual Care | 0.23 | 95% Confidence Interval 0.20 to 0.27 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With New or Worsening Signs/Symptoms Within 30 Days of Discharge | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | 0.90 | 95% Confidence Interval 0.86 to 1.01 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With New or Worsening Signs/Symptoms Within 30 Days of Discharge | Usual Care | 0.92 | 95% Confidence Interval 0.85 to 0.97 | proportion of participants | |
| Number of Patients With a Nonelective Readmission Within 30 Days of the Index Discharge Date | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | 107 | participants | ||
| Number of Patients With a Nonelective Readmission Within 30 Days of the Index Discharge Date | Usual Care | 78 | participants | ||
| Change in Functional Status on the Modified Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-12 (SF-12v2) From One Month Prior to Admission to 30 Days After Discharge. | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | 47.25 | Standard Deviation 7.85 | units on a scale | |
| Change in Functional Status on the Modified Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-12 (SF-12v2) From One Month Prior to Admission to 30 Days After Discharge. | Usual Care | 46.14 | Standard Deviation 8.11 | units on a scale | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | Used medical terminology you did not understand | .86 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Usual Care | Used medical terminology you did not understand | .85 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | Felt confused because things not explained well | .86 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Usual Care | Felt confused because things not explained well | .88 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | Not given enough time to say what was important | .92 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Usual Care | Not given enough time to say what was important | .90 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | How often did care team listen carefully to you | .94 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Usual Care | How often did care team listen carefully to you | .92 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | Felt pressured to have treatment not sure about | .95 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Usual Care | Felt pressured to have treatment not sure about | .95 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Multi-Model Intensive Discharge Program | Asked if you might have problems w/ recommended tx | .41 | proportion of participants | |
| Proportion of Participants With Positive Responses Regarding Patient Engagement and Opinions of the Discharge Process | Usual Care | Asked if you might have problems w/ recommended tx | .34 | proportion of participants |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02130570/results