ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02138786

Selinexor in Initial or Refractory and/or Relapsed Richter's Transformation

NCT02138786, Phase 2, Terminated, Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc; results first posted 2020-02-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Selinexor in Initial or Refractory and/or Relapsed Richter's Transformation. Trials, record NCT02138786. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02138786

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Selinexor in Initial or Refractory and/or Relapsed Richter's Transformation
NCT number
NCT02138786
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
27 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc
Conditions
Richter's Transformation
Interventions
selinexor
First posted
2014-05-15
Last updated
2023-01-26
Results first posted
2020-02-11
Limitations and caveats
The low number of formal objective responses (leading to the termination of the study following the first stage), coupled with the high number of censored observations, limited meaningful analyses and the ability to draw conclusions from the data.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (Overall Response Rate)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the point estimate of the percentage of patients who have complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Disease response was assessed using the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Cheson 2007), including assessment of lymph node, spleen and liver lesions by PET (positron emission tomography) scan and assessment of bone marrow biopsies by morphologic, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry tests. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease, and PR was defined as ≥ 50% regression of measurable disease and no new sites.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Number of patients who achieved CR (complete disappearance of all detectable evidence of disease). Disease response was assessed using the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Cheson 2007), including assessment of lymph node, spleen and liver lesions by PET (positron emission tomography) scan and assessment of bone marrow biopsies by morphologic, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry tests.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Partial Response (PR)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Number of patients whose best overall response to study treatment was PR (≥ 50% regression of measurable disease and no new sites). Disease response was assessed using the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Cheson 2007), including assessment of lymph node, spleen and liver lesions by PET (positron emission tomography) scan and assessment of bone marrow biopsies by morphologic, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry tests.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Stable Disease (SD)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Number of patients whose best overall response to study treatment was SD (failure to attain criteria for CR or PR, or to meet criteria for PD). Disease response was assessed using the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Cheson 2007), including assessment of lymph node, spleen and liver lesions by PET (positron emission tomography) scan and assessment of bone marrow biopsies by morphologic, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry tests.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Number of patients whose best overall response to study treatment was PD (any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir). Disease response was assessed using the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Cheson 2007), including assessment of lymph node, spleen and liver lesions by PET (positron emission tomography) scan and assessment of bone marrow biopsies by morphologic, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry tests.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Not Evaluable (NE) Response
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Number of patients who could not be assessed quantitatively for disease response for any reason.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the percentage of patients who achieved CR, PR, or SD lasting for at least 8 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. PR was defined as ≥ 50% regression of measurable disease and no new sites. SD was defined as failure to attain criteria for CR or PR, or to meet criteria for PD. Disease response was assessed using the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Cheson 2007), including assessment of lymph node, spleen and liver lesions by PET (positron emission tomography) scan and assessment of bone marrow biopsies by morphologic, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry tests.
SecondaryDuration of Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Number of days calculated from date of start of study therapy to date of progression based on IWG criteria, or date of death if progression did not occur. Patients who dropped out prior to study end without evidence of disease progression were censored at the day they were last known to be alive. Patients without documented disease progression or recurrence were censored at the date of last disease assessment. Disease response was assessed using the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Cheson 2007), including assessment of lymph node, spleen and liver lesions by PET (positron emission tomography) scan and assessment of bone marrow biopsies by morphologic, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry tests. .

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (Overall Response Rate)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Partial Response (PR)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Stable Disease (SD)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Not Evaluable (NE) Response
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Assessments were performed at Screening or Cycle 1/Day 1 prior to dosing and on Cycle 3/Day 1 and alternate cycles thereafter until disease progression, study drug intolerability had been reached, study withdrawal, or death.
Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of selinexor and had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. Patients without post-baseline efficacy follow-up information who discontinued the study due to toxicity, disease progression, or death were included in this population.
DaysMEDIAN

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (Overall Response Rate)Selinexor495% Confidence Interval 0.1 to 20.4Percentage of participants
Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR)Selinexor0Participants
Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR)Selinexor1Participants
Number of Participants With Stable Disease (SD)Selinexor6Participants
Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD)Selinexor7Participants
Number of Participants With Not Evaluable (NE) ResponseSelinexor11Participants
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (Disease Control Rate)Selinexor28.095% Confidence Interval 12.1 to 49.4Percentage of participants
Duration of Progression Free Survival (PFS)Selinexor38.095% Confidence Interval 22.0 to 86.0Days

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)3
Overall StudySTARTEDSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)15
Overall StudySTARTEDSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)8

Adverse events489

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)23
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)815
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)38
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)13
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)515
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)38
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)13
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)715
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)18
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)13

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)13
Total, all-cause mortalitySelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)815
Total, all-cause mortalitySelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)28
Total, other adverse eventsSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)33
Total, other adverse eventsSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)1515
Total, other adverse eventsSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)78
Total, serious adverse eventsSelinexor 60 mg/m² (8 Doses/Cycle)33
Total, serious adverse eventsSelinexor 60 mg (6 Doses/Cycle)915
Total, serious adverse eventsSelinexor 60 mg (8 Doses/Cycle)58

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
17242396BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02138786

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02138786/events?page=2