ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02152982

Temozolomide With or Without Veliparib in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme

NCT02152982, Phase 2, Phase 3, Active not recruiting, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2023-04-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Temozolomide With or Without Veliparib in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme. Trials, record NCT02152982. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02152982

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Temozolomide With or Without Veliparib in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme
NCT number
NCT02152982
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
447 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Glioblastoma, Gliosarcoma
Interventions
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Placebo Administration, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Temozolomide, Veliparib
First posted
2014-06-02
Last updated
2026-10-27
Results first posted
2023-04-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)83 monthsThe distribution of OS for each arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with a stratified logrank test.
SecondaryInteraction With Optune Device10 years
Cox proportional hazards model will be used to evaluate whether there is a potential interaction between the treatment arm and the Optune device. If an interaction is detected, separate analyses of treatment effect (using Cox models) will be done for patients treated with the Optune device and patients who were not treated with the Optune device.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)120 months
The distribution of PFS for each arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and be compared using Cox proportional hazard models with all stratification factors adjusted. Progression (PD): Defined by any of the following: 1. \> 25% increase in sum of products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions, compared with the smallest tumor measurement obtained either at baseline or best response 2. Significant increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesion on stable or increasing doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan or best response after therapy initiation (stable doses of steroids include patient not on steroids) not caused by comorbid events 3. Any new lesion 4. Clear clinical deterioration not attributable to other causes apart from tumor or change in corticosteroid dose 5. Failure to return for evaluation as a result of death or deteriorating condition 6. Clear progression of non-measurable disease
SecondaryObjective Tumor Response5 years
Defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as specified in the Revised Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. An objective tumor response will be evaluated for each patient and the tumor response count will be summarized for each arm and compared using the Chi-square test. For CR, all of the following must be true: disappearance of all enhancing measurable and non-measurable disease; no new enhancing lesions; stable or improved non-enhancing lesions; patients must be off corticosteroids; stable or improved clinically A PR requires all of the following: \> 50% decrease in sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable enhancing lesions compared with baseline; no progression of non-measurable disease; no new lesions; stable or improved non-enhancing lesions on same or lower dose of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan; steroid dose should be same or lower compared with baseline scan; stable or improved clinically
SecondaryOverall Adverse Event Rates for Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events5 years
Assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (version 5 beginning April 1, 2018). The overall adverse event rates for grade 3 or higher adverse events will be summarized and be compared using Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact tests between treatment arms. The maximum grade for each type of treatment-related adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables for each arm will be reviewed to determine patterns. Treatment-related adverse events will be tabulated for each arm.
OtherChange in Quality of Life (QOL)Baseline to up to 5 years
Measured by the fatigue/uniscale tool. The fatigue/uniscale tool will be used as a measure of QOL. Potential differences in fatigue levels of patients treated on the two different arms will be evaluated. Changes in this measure will be evaluated over the course of treatment for both arms and will be compared using a two-sample t-test at each timepoint. Will also compute a normalized area under the curve (AUC) for the values of each patient over time and compare the mean AUCs for patients on the two arms.
OtherMGMT StatusBaseline
The concordance between site-determined MGMT methylation status and central laboratory determination of MGMT status will be analyzed using the Chi-Square test of proportions and 95% confidence intervals for the proportion of tests in disagreement with the local site.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)83 monthsmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYInteraction With Optune Device10 yearsAnalysis population is patients that reported actual optune useparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)120 monthsmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Tumor Response5 yearsAll patients randomized to the trial with measurable disease per RANO criteria at registration and at one or more assessment(s) post-baseline.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYOverall Adverse Event Rates for Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events5 yearsOnly includes patients that began treatmentparticipants with at least 1 grade 3+ AENUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange in Quality of Life (QOL)Baseline to up to 5 years
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDMGMT StatusBaseline

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Arm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)24.890% Confidence Interval 22.6 to 27.7months
Overall Survival (OS)Arm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)28.190% Confidence Interval 24.3 to 33.3months
Interaction With Optune DeviceArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)Reporting actual Optune use42participants
Interaction With Optune DeviceArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)Reporting actual Optune use42participants
Interaction With Optune DeviceArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)No actual Optune use182participants
Interaction With Optune DeviceArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)No actual Optune use181participants
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Arm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)12.195% Confidence Interval 10.6 to 14.9months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Arm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)13.295% Confidence Interval 10.5 to 14.9months
Objective Tumor ResponseArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)34Participants
Objective Tumor ResponseArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)37Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)224
Overall StudySTARTEDArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)223
Overall StudyStarted TreatmentArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)213
Overall StudyStarted TreatmentArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)218
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)144
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)134
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)80
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)89

Adverse events464

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)1721336
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)3621884
otherThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)12131
otherThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)02180
otherChest pain - cardiacCardiac disordersArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)12131
otherChest pain - cardiacCardiac disordersArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)02180
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)12131
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)12181
otherEar and labyrinth disorders - Oth specEar and labyrinth disordersArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)02130
otherEar and labyrinth disorders - Oth specEar and labyrinth disordersArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)32184

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)175213
Total, all-cause mortalityArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)183218
Total, other adverse eventsArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)207213
Total, other adverse eventsArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)217218
Total, serious adverse eventsArm I (Temozolomide, Placebo)47213
Total, serious adverse eventsArm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib)43218

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26615020DERIVEDPubMed
39480453DERIVEDPubMed

Grants3

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10CA180821Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Operations CenterGalanis, Evanthia; Hahn, Olwen; Kozono, DavidALLIANCE NCTN FOUNDATIONNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2026NIH RePORTER
P50CA108961Mayo SPORE in Brain CancerO'NEILL, BRIAN PATRICKMAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2004 to 2015NIH RePORTER
U10CA031946Cancer and Leukemia Group BBERTAGNOLLI, MONICA MBRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITALNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Arm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib) vs Arm I (Temozolomide, Placebo): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Arm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib) vs Arm I (Temozolomide, Placebo): Objective Tumor ResponseTrial comparisons
Arm II (Temozolomide, Veliparib) vs Arm I (Temozolomide, Placebo): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02152982

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02152982/events?page=2