Trial · NCT02155660
Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) With Exacerbation History
NCT02155660, Phase 3, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2019-06-26
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) With Exacerbation History. Trials, record NCT02155660. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02155660
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) With Exacerbation History
- NCT number
- NCT02155660
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 2,255 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Conditions
- Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Interventions
- Benralizumab Arm A, Benralizumab Arm B, Benralizumab Arm C, Placebo
- First posted
- 2014-06-04
- Last updated
- 2019-06-26
- Results first posted
- 2019-06-26
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes19
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Immediately following the first IP dose through week 56 | A COPD exacerbation is defined by symptomatic worsening of COPD requiring: * Use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days; a single depot injectable dose of corticosteroids will be considered equivalent to a 3-day course of systemic corticosteroids; and/or * Use of antibiotics; and/or * An inpatient hospitalization or death due to COPD Annual COPD exacerbation rate is the number of exacerbations per year. Its raw rate is calculated by number of exacerbations divided by the treatment period and then normalized to an annual rate, and is estimated by negative binomial model. Rate ratio between two treatment groups is also estimated through this model. |
| Secondary | Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS<220/uL | Immediately following the first IP dose through week 56 | A COPD exacerbation is defined by symptomatic worsening of COPD requiring: * Use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days; a single depot injectable dose of corticosteroids will be considered equivalent to a 3-day course of systemic corticosteroids; and/or * Use of antibiotics; and/or * An inpatient hospitalization or death due to COPD Annual COPD exacerbation rate is the number of exacerbations per year. Its raw rate is calculated by number of exacerbations divided by the treatment period and then normalized to an annual rate, and is estimated by negative binomial model. Rate ratio between two treatment groups is also estimated through this model. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) Value for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to end of treatment Week 56 | Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) is collected at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56. Baseline is the last non-missing value with quality (acceptable or borderline quality grade) prior to the first dose of study treatment. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | SGRQ is from 50-item PRO instrument. The SGRQ total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100% means the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | CAT is an 8-item PRO developed to measure the impact of COPD on health status. The instrument uses semantic differential six-point response scales. A CAT total score is the sum of item responses. Score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicative of greater COPD impact on health status. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in E-RS: COPD Total Score for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | The E-RS: COPD is an 11-item PRO developed to evaluate the severity of respiratory symptoms of COPD. Summation of E-RS: COPD item responses produces a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Rescue Medication Use (Number of Puffs Per Day) for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | The number of rescue medication inhalations and nebulizer treatments taken are recorded by the patient in the eDiary twice daily. Total rescue medication use is the sum of daytime and night-time use. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Awakenings Due to Respiratory Symptoms for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | Change from baseline to Week 56 in proportion of nights with awakenings due to respiratory symptoms. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants by Number of COPD Exacerbations Based on EXACT-PRO for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Immediately following first IP up to week 56 | The EXACT-PRO is a 14-item PRO instrument developed to assess the frequency, severity and duration of COPD exacerbations. Respondents are instructed to complete the electronic diary (eDiary) each evening just prior to bedtime and to answer the questions while considering their experiences "today". The daily EXACT-PRO total score is recorded and has a range of 0-100 with higher scores indicative of greater severity. COPD exacerbation event frequency is calculated based on comparison of the baseline score with daily total scores. An increase of EXACT-PRO total score ≥9 for 3 days or ≥12 for 2 days indicates a COPD exacerbation event has occurred. |
| Secondary | Severity of EXACT-PRO for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Immediately following first IP up to week 56 | The EXACT-PRO is a 14-item PRO instrument developed to assess the frequency, severity and duration of COPD exacerbations. Respondents are instructed to complete the electronic diary (eDiary) each evening just prior to bedtime and to answer the questions while considering their experiences "today". The daily EXACT-PRO total score has a range of 0-100 with higher scores indicative of greater severity. Severity of the study is the highest score of EXACT-PRO. |
1 to 10 of 19Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 19 registered outcomesOutcomes19
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Immediately following the first IP dose through week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Exacerbations per year | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS<220/uL | Immediately following the first IP dose through week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\<220/uL | Exacerbations per year | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) Value for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to end of treatment Week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Liter | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline in SGRQ Total Score for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Percentage | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline in CAT Total Score for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline in E-RS: COPD Total Score for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline in Total Rescue Medication Use (Number of Puffs Per Day) for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Puffs/day | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline in Proportion of Nights With Awakenings Due to Respiratory Symptoms for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | First IP up to Week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Proportion of nights | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Number of Participants by Number of COPD Exacerbations Based on EXACT-PRO for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Immediately following first IP up to week 56 | Full analysis set, EOS\>=220/uL | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| SECONDARY | Severity of EXACT-PRO for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Immediately following first IP up to week 56 | Full analysis set, baseline EOS\>=220/uL | Score on a scale | MEAN |
1 to 10 of 19Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 19 outcomesResults by group174
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Benralizumab 10 mg | 0.99 | 95% Confidence Interval 0.87 to 1.13 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Benralizumab 30 mg | 1.21 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.08 to 1.37 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Benralizumab 100 mg | 1.09 | 95% Confidence Interval 0.96 to 1.23 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Placebo | 1.17 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.04 to 1.32 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS<220/uL | Benralizumab 10 mg | 1.23 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.03 to 1.46 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS<220/uL | Benralizumab 30 mg | 1.27 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.05 to 1.53 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS<220/uL | Benralizumab 100 mg | 1.21 | 95% Confidence Interval 1.00 to 1.45 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Annual COPD Exacerbation Rate Over 56 Weeks Treatment Comparison for Patients With Baseline EOS<220/uL | Placebo | 1.18 | 95% Confidence Interval 0.98 to 1.41 | Exacerbations per year | |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) Value for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Benralizumab 10 mg | 0.021 | Standard Deviation 0.346 | Liter | |
| Mean Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (L) Value for Patients With Baseline EOS>=220/uL | Benralizumab 30 mg | 0.011 | Standard Deviation 0.289 | Liter |
1 to 10 of 174Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 174 results by groupParticipant flow12
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Benralizumab 10 mg | 562 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Benralizumab 30 mg | 562 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Benralizumab 100 mg | 562 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo | 568 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Benralizumab 10 mg | 504 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Benralizumab 30 mg | 489 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Benralizumab 100 mg | 502 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo | 507 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Benralizumab 10 mg | 58 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Benralizumab 30 mg | 73 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 participant flowAdverse events1,132
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Oedema peripheral | General disorders | Benra 10 mg | 15 | 561 | 17 |
| other | Oedema peripheral | General disorders | Benra 30 mg | 9 | 563 | 9 |
| other | Oedema peripheral | General disorders | Benra 100 mg | 17 | 562 | 18 |
| other | Oedema peripheral | General disorders | Placebo | 9 | 568 | 10 |
| other | Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | Benra 10 mg | 66 | 561 | 94 |
| other | Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | Benra 30 mg | 70 | 563 | 100 |
| other | Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | Benra 100 mg | 63 | 562 | 87 |
| other | Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 66 | 568 | 88 |
| other | Influenza | Infections and infestations | Benra 10 mg | 11 | 561 | 11 |
| other | Influenza | Infections and infestations | Benra 30 mg | 20 | 563 | 22 |
1 to 10 of 1,132Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 1,132 adverse eventsAdverse event totals12
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Benra 10 mg | 17 | 561 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Benra 30 mg | 21 | 563 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Benra 100 mg | 17 | 562 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | 19 | 568 |
| Total, other adverse events | Benra 10 mg | 251 | 561 |
| Total, other adverse events | Benra 30 mg | 233 | 563 |
| Total, other adverse events | Benra 100 mg | 238 | 562 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 260 | 568 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Benra 10 mg | 144 | 561 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Benra 30 mg | 177 | 563 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 adverse event totalsPapers2
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02155660
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02155660/results?page=2