ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02157376

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis of Intravenous Esomeprazole in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients

NCT02157376, Phase 3, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2017-01-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis of Intravenous Esomeprazole in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients. Trials, record NCT02157376. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02157376

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis of Intravenous Esomeprazole in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients
NCT number
NCT02157376
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
343 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis
Interventions
Esomeprazole, Cimetidine
First posted
2014-06-06
Last updated
2017-03-10
Results first posted
2017-01-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase1-14 days
Criteria for a clinically significant upper GI bleeding as: 1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that did not clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of at least 100 ml lavage with room temperature normal saline-or, 2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material During IMP treatment Day 1-2: Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material for at least eight consecutive hours that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline. During IMP treatment Day 3-14: Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material in at least three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60 ±20 minutes apart), that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase1-14 days
Criteria for a significant upper GI bleeding as described in primary outcome measure or, Criteria for a non-significant upper GI bleeding as: 1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of lavage with room temperature normal saline or, 2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material During IMP treatment Day 1-2: Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material for at less than eight consecutive hours or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline. During IMP treatment Day 3-14: Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material in less than three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60±20 minutes apart), or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline or, 3. Any clinical signs of hematemesis or melena or haematochezia judged (by the Investigator) to be from an upper GI source.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase1-14 daysFull analysis set (FAS). All randomized patients in whom at least one dose of randomized treatment has been initiated.% of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase1-14 daysFull analysis set (FAS). All randomized patients in whom at least one dose of randomized treatment has been initiated.proportion of participantsNUMBER

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation PhaseEsomeprazole2.7% of participants
The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation PhaseCimetidine4.6% of participants
Proportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation PhaseEsomeprazole0.109proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation PhaseCimetidine0.105proportion of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEsomeprazole155
Overall StudySTARTEDCimetidine156
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEsomeprazole133
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCimetidine138
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEsomeprazole22
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCimetidine18

Adverse events64

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCimetidine1515315
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEsomeprazole1314713
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersCimetidine1415315
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersEsomeprazole814711
otherUpper gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disordersCimetidine1015313
otherUpper gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disordersEsomeprazole61477
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersCimetidine2515331
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersEsomeprazole2714731
otherHepatic function abnormalHepatobiliary disordersCimetidine1015310
otherHepatic function abnormalHepatobiliary disordersEsomeprazole91479

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCimetidine
Total, all-cause mortalityEsomeprazole
Total, other adverse eventsCimetidine88153
Total, other adverse eventsEsomeprazole85147
Total, serious adverse eventsCimetidine12153
Total, serious adverse eventsEsomeprazole14147

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29638148DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Cimetidine vs Esomeprazole: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02157376

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02157376/events?page=2