ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02166476

Efficacy/Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam Compared to Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults With cUTI and AP

NCT02166476, Phase 3, Completed, Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.; results first posted 2017-10-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy/Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam Compared to Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults With cUTI and AP. Trials, record NCT02166476. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02166476

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy/Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam Compared to Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults With cUTI and AP
NCT number
NCT02166476
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
550 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
Conditions
Urinary Tract Infection Complicated, Acute Pyelonephritis
Interventions
Meropenem-Vaborbactam, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Levofloxacin, Saline
First posted
2014-06-18
Last updated
2018-06-11
Results first posted
2017-10-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment VisitEOIVT (Days 5-14)
This was the primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For this composite outcome measure, overall success was achieved with a clinical outcome of Cure or Improvement and microbiologic outcome of Eradication at the end of intravenous treatment (EOIVT). Cure was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms. Eradication was defined using the FDA's colony-forming units (CFU)/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
PrimaryProportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure VisitTest of cure (TOC) (Days 15-23)
This was the primary outcome measure for the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For this measure, a microbiologic outcome of Eradication was defined using the EMA's CFU/mL criteria: bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was reduced to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
PrimaryProportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC VisitTOC (Days 15-23)
This was the primary outcome measure for the EMA. For this measure, a microbiologic outcome of Eradication was defined using the EMA's CFU/mL criteria: bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was reduced to \<10\^3 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture). The ME population included all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
SecondaryProportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall SuccessEOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23)
This secondary outcome measure focused on the overall success in the ME population at the EOIVT and TOC visits. Overall success at TOC was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Overall success at EOIVT was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured or Improvement and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Cured was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP, but continued IV therapy was warranted. Eradication was defined using the FDA's CFU/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
SecondaryProportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall SuccessEOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23)
This secondary outcome measure focused on the overall success in the ME population at the EOIVT and TOC visits. Overall success was defined as a clinical outcome of Cured or Improvement and a microbiologic outcome of Eradication. Cured was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP. Improvement was defined as lessening, incomplete resolution, or no worsening of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP, but continued IV therapy was warranted. Eradication was defined using the FDA's CFU/mL criteria that the bacterial pathogen(s) found at baseline was/were reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
SecondaryProportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of EradicationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
This secondary outcome measure focused on a microbiological outcome of Eradication in the m-MITT population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, end of treatment (EOT), TOC, and late follow up (LFU). Eradication was defined as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture (FDA) or \<10\^3 CFU/mL (EMA), and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as a uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
SecondaryProportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of EradicationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
This secondary outcome measure focused on a microbiological outcome of Eradication in the ME population at 5 time points: Day 3, EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU. Eradication was defined as a reduction in baseline bacterial pathogen(s) to \<10\^4 CFU/mL of urine culture (FDA) or \<10\^3 CFU/mL (EMA), and a negative blood culture for an organism that was identified as an uropathogen (if repeated after positive at baseline blood culture).
SecondaryProportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT PopulationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the m-MITT Population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits.
SecondaryProportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) PopulationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the CE population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at the Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits.
SecondaryProportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME PopulationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
This secondary outcome measure focused on a clinical outcome of Cure in the ME population. A clinical outcome of Cure was defined as the following: at EOIVT, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP; at EOT, TOC, and LFU, the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP such that no further antimicrobial therapy was warranted. Symptom resolution did not necessarily include baseline symptoms associated with anatomic abnormalities that predisposed to cUTI, such as symptoms associated with the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The clinical outcome of Cure was reported only at the EOIVT, EOT, TOC, and LFU visits, and improvement was reported only at the Day 3, EOIVT, and EOT visits.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment VisitEOIVT (Days 5-14)
The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYProportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure VisitTest of cure (TOC) (Days 15-23)
The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYProportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC VisitTOC (Days 15-23)
ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall SuccessEOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23)
The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion Of Participants In The ME Population With Overall SuccessEOIVT (Days 5-14) and TOC (Days 15-23)
ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of EradicationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion Of Participants In The ME Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of EradicationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The m-MITT PopulationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
The m-MITT population included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had a baseline bacterial pathogen(s) of ≥10\^5 CFU/mL of urine at baseline urine culture or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine cultures.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The Clinical Evaluable (CE) PopulationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
CE population: all participants who received ≥1 dose of drug (MITT), had no key inclusion/exclusion criteria violations, had a clinical outcome (Cure, Improvement, Failure) at EOIVT, received 80-120% of expected IV doses, missed ≤1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed ≤2 consecutive IV doses overall, received ≥6 doses (Failure) or ≥9 doses (Cure).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion Of Participants With A Clinical Outcome Of Cure In The ME PopulationDay 3, EOIVT (Days 5-14), EOT (Days 10-14), TOC (Days 15-23), and LFU (Days 22-30)
ME population: all participants who met m-MITT criteria and had a clinical outcome and microbiologic outcome at EOIVT or earlier; received \<80% or \>120% of expected IV doses; missed no more than 1 IV dose in the first 48 hours, missed no more than 2 consecutive IV doses; received no less than 6 doses for failure or no less than 9 doses for cure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group258

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment VisitMeropenem-Vaborbactam189Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment VisitPiperacillin-Tazobactam171Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure VisitMeropenem-Vaborbactam128Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure VisitPiperacillin-Tazobactam105Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC VisitMeropenem-Vaborbactam118Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC VisitPiperacillin-Tazobactam102Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall SuccessMeropenem-VaborbactamEOIVT189Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall SuccessPiperacillin-TazobactamEOIVT171Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall SuccessMeropenem-VaborbactamTOC143Participants
Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population With Overall SuccessPiperacillin-TazobactamTOC128Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMeropenem-Vaborbactam272
Overall StudySTARTEDPiperacillin-Tazobactam273
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugMeropenem-Vaborbactam272
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPiperacillin-Tazobactam273
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMeropenem-Vaborbactam258
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPiperacillin-Tazobactam250
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMeropenem-Vaborbactam14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPiperacillin-Tazobactam23

Adverse events50

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersMeropenem-Vaborbactam24272
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPiperacillin-Tazobactam12273
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersMeropenem-Vaborbactam9272
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPiperacillin-Tazobactam12273
otherInfusion Site PhlebitisGeneral disordersMeropenem-Vaborbactam6272
otherInfusion Site PhlebitisGeneral disordersPiperacillin-Tazobactam2273
otherVaginal InfectionInfections and infestationsMeropenem-Vaborbactam1272
otherVaginal InfectionInfections and infestationsPiperacillin-Tazobactam6273
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersMeropenem-Vaborbactam1272
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersPiperacillin-Tazobactam0273

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMeropenem-Vaborbactam2272
Total, all-cause mortalityPiperacillin-Tazobactam2273
Total, other adverse eventsMeropenem-Vaborbactam36272
Total, other adverse eventsPiperacillin-Tazobactam31273
Total, serious adverse eventsMeropenem-Vaborbactam11272
Total, serious adverse eventsPiperacillin-Tazobactam12273

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29486041DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam: Proportion Of Participants In The m-MITT Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The Test Of Cure VisitTrial comparisons
Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam: Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-MITT) Population Who Achieved Overall Success At The End Of Intravenous Treatment Visit
Trial comparisons
Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam: Proportion Of Participants In The Microbiological Evaluable (ME) Population Who Achieved A Microbiologic Outcome Of Eradication At The TOC VisitTrial comparisons
Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02166476

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02166476/results?page=2