ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02175225

Intracerebral Hemorrhage Deferoxamine Trial - iDEF Ttrial

NCT02175225, Phase 2, Completed, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; results first posted 2019-05-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intracerebral Hemorrhage Deferoxamine Trial - iDEF Ttrial. Trials, record NCT02175225. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02175225

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Deferoxamine Trial - iDEF Ttrial
NCT number
NCT02175225
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
294 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Conditions
Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Interventions
Deferoxamine Mesylate, Placebo (for Deferoxamine Mesylate)
First posted
2014-06-26
Last updated
2019-05-30
Results first posted
2019-05-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 90 Days90 days
The primary outcome measure of efficacy is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, dichotomized to define good functional outcome as mRS 0-2 at 90 days. The mRS ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
PrimaryNumber of Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse Events90 daysNumber of subjects experiencing Serious adverse events at any time from randomization through day 90
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days7 daysNumber of Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse Events within 7 days of randomization
SecondaryProportion of Patients With mRS Score 0-3 at 90 Days90 days
Another measure of efficacy is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, dichotomized to define good functional outcome as mRS 0-3 at 90 days. The mRS ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating worse outcome. Although mRS 0-3 is less favorable than the primary outcome of mRS 0-2, it would still be a desirable effect in patients with ICH given that no treatments exist to reduce disability.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 180 Days180 days
Another measure of efficacy is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, dichotomized to define good functional outcome as mRS 0-2 at 180 days. The mRS ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-3 at 180 Days180 days
Another measure of efficacy is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, dichotomized to define good functional outcome as mRS 0-3 at 180 days. The mRS ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
SecondaryProportion of Subjects With Good Outcome (mRS 0-2) in the Early vs. Delayed Treatment Time Windows90 days
Analyses will be expanded to include an interaction between treatment and OTT window and the magnitude of the treatment effect, and corresponding confidence interval, will be estimated for each time window (\<12 hours vs. \>/= 12 hours) in order to explore the presence of a differential treatment effect in the OTT windows.
OtherOrdinal Distribution of Scores on mRS at Day 9090 daysThe overall ordinal distribution of scores on mRS at 90 days in DFO- and placebo-treated subjects will be determined.
OtherOrdinal Distribution of Scores on mRS at 180 Days180 daysThe overall ordinal distribution of scores on mRS at 180 days in DFO- and placebo-treated subjects will be determined.
OtherAdverse Event of Special Interest: Number of Patients With Allergic Reactions (During Infusion of Study Drug)during the study infusionAdverse event of special interest: anaphylaxis at any time during the study infusion

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 90 Days90 days
Per the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated. Complete case analysis was planned as the primary analytic approach.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse Events90 daysPer the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days7 daysPer the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With mRS Score 0-3 at 90 Days90 days
Per the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated. Complete case analysis was planned as the primary analytic approach.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 180 Days180 days
Per the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated. Complete case analysis was planned as the primary analytic approach.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-3 at 180 Days180 days
Per the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated. Complete case analysis was planned as the primary analytic approach.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProportion of Subjects With Good Outcome (mRS 0-2) in the Early vs. Delayed Treatment Time Windows90 days
Per the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated. Complete case analysis was planned as the primary analytic approach. Subgroup analysis by Onset to treatment time window (\<=12 hours vs \>12 hours)
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDOrdinal Distribution of Scores on mRS at Day 9090 days
Per the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated. Complete case analysis was planned as the primary analytic approach.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDOrdinal Distribution of Scores on mRS at 180 Days180 days
Per the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated. Complete case analysis was planned as the primary analytic approach.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDAdverse Event of Special Interest: Number of Patients With Allergic Reactions (During Infusion of Study Drug)during the study infusionPer the SAP, the target population is the modified intention-to-treat population, including only subjects in whom study infusion is initiated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 90 DaysDeferoxamine Mesylate48Participants
Proportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 90 DaysNormal Saline47Participants
Number of Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse EventsDeferoxamine Mesylate39Participants
Number of Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse EventsNormal Saline49Participants
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events Within 7 DaysDeferoxamine Mesylate24Participants
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events Within 7 DaysNormal Saline26Participants
Proportion of Patients With mRS Score 0-3 at 90 DaysDeferoxamine Mesylate91Participants
Proportion of Patients With mRS Score 0-3 at 90 DaysNormal Saline82Participants
Proportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 180 DaysDeferoxamine Mesylate61Participants
Proportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 180 DaysNormal Saline48Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDeferoxamine Mesylate145
Overall StudySTARTEDNormal Saline149
Overall StudyInitiated Study DrugDeferoxamine Mesylate144
Overall StudyInitiated Study DrugNormal Saline147
Overall Study90 Day Outcome ObtainedDeferoxamine Mesylate140
Overall Study90 Day Outcome ObtainedNormal Saline143
Overall Study180 Day Outcome ObtainedDeferoxamine Mesylate135
Overall Study180 Day Outcome ObtainedNormal Saline135
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDeferoxamine Mesylate137
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNormal Saline138

Adverse events442

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersDeferoxamine Mesylate1114412
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersNormal Saline1114713
otherMyocardial infarctionCardiac disordersDeferoxamine Mesylate01440
otherMyocardial infarctionCardiac disordersNormal Saline11471
otherMyocardial ischaemiaCardiac disordersDeferoxamine Mesylate01440
otherMyocardial ischaemiaCardiac disordersNormal Saline11471
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersDeferoxamine Mesylate11441
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersNormal Saline01470
otherHearing impairedEar and labyrinth disordersDeferoxamine Mesylate11441
otherHearing impairedEar and labyrinth disordersNormal Saline11471

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDeferoxamine Mesylate12144
Total, all-cause mortalityNormal Saline12147
Total, other adverse eventsDeferoxamine Mesylate107144
Total, other adverse eventsNormal Saline114147
Total, serious adverse eventsDeferoxamine Mesylate39144
Total, serious adverse eventsNormal Saline50147

Papers15

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
19064798BACKGROUNDPubMed
20044521BACKGROUNDPubMed
21868742BACKGROUNDPubMed
23943316BACKGROUNDPubMed
24172580BACKGROUNDPubMed
24187595BACKGROUNDPubMed
24366522BACKGROUNDPubMed
30898550DERIVEDPubMed
33758069DERIVEDPubMed
34789008DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 15

See all 15 papers

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U01NS074425Futility Study of Deferoxamine Mesylate in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (i-DEF)SELIM, MAGDY HBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE2012 to 2016

Trial comparisons12

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events Within 7 DaysTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Proportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 90 DaysTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Number of Patients With Symptomatic Cerebral EdemaTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Number of Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Proportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-2 at 180 DaysTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Adverse Event of Special Interest: Number of Patients With New Visual or Auditory ChangesTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Proportion of Patients With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0-3 at 180 DaysTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Proportion of Patients With mRS Score 0-3 at 90 DaysTrial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Adverse Event of Special Interest: Number of Patients With Allergic Reactions (During Infusion of Study Drug)Trial comparisons
Deferoxamine Mesylate vs Normal Saline: Adverse Event of Special Interest: Number of Patients With HypotensionTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02175225

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02175225/results?page=2