ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02181075

Targeted Chemotherapy Using Focused Ultrasound for Liver Tumours

NCT02181075, Phase 1, Completed, University of Oxford; results first posted 2019-06-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Targeted Chemotherapy Using Focused Ultrasound for Liver Tumours. Trials, record NCT02181075. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02181075

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Targeted Chemotherapy Using Focused Ultrasound for Liver Tumours
NCT number
NCT02181075
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Enrollment
10 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Oxford
Conditions
Liver Tumour
Interventions
ThermoDox® (LTLD), Focused Ultrasound of Target Liver Tumour, Pre-LTLD Biopsy of Target Liver Tumour, Post-LTLD Biopsy of Target Liver Tumour, Post-LTLD+FUS (Post-FUS) Biopsy of Target Liver Tumour, Thermometry of Target Tumour
First posted
2014-07-03
Last updated
2019-07-22
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-000514-61
Results first posted
2019-06-24
Limitations and caveats
Key Lancet Oncology paper (detailed in References section) addresses these limitations:~1. Laboratory limitations not detailed e.g. under/over estimates~2. Tertiary endpoints not presented

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Concentration of Total Intratumoral Doxorubicin in Liver Tumour (Biopsies) Following Targeted Release of Doxorubicin From ThermoDox® ('Drug') Using Mild Hyperthermia Generated Non-invasively by Focused Ultrasound (FUS)
Post-intervention sample (Day 1) compared to pre-intervention sample (Day 1)
Analytical chemistry (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) for total doxorubicin (including both released and unreleased forms) was performed on section of intratumoral biopsy samples in Good Clinical Practice Laboratory, using a validated assay. Doxorubicin concentration was evaluated in biopsy samples both post-LTLD and post-LTLD+FUS. Tumour samples were not analysed same day and were frozen at -80\^oC for subsequent analysis. Required to evaluate the primary endpoint.
PrimaryPatients Demonstrating >Two-fold Increase in the Amount of Intratumoural Doxorubicin Before and After Focused UltrasoundPost-LTLD+FUS sample (Day 1) compared to Post-LTLD sample (Day 1)
To satisfy the primary endpoint, a demonstrable two-fold increase in\*, or value exceeding 10μg/g of, the concentration of intra-tumoural doxorubicin at the treated tumour site following FUS-induced mild hyperthermia, was required in at least 50% of evaluable participants. \* As per the a priori protocol design, in Part II the biopsy prior to FUS-induced mild hyperthermia is not performed and therefore the average value for all evaluable tumours receiving intervention in Part I is used as a comparison for the two-fold increase from pre-FUS to post-FUS biopsy.
Secondary
(Part I Only) Achievement of Satisfactory Hyperthermia Within the Target Liver Tumour for a Range of Participant Body Mass Indices (BMIs) and Tumour Locations Within the Liver (Optimal FUS Exposure Parameters)
Real-time thermometry monitoring during intervention (Day 1)
Achievement of hyperthermia in the target liver tumour, as determined by real-time thermometry obtained by an indwelling thermometry device. For success, sustained and controlled hyperthermia is required in the target tumour, consequent with drug release (in excess of 39.5\^oC). Real time thermometry plots for each Part I patient are available in the key Lancet Oncology publication, details available in the References section.
SecondaryPersistence of Cell Viability Stain Post-LTLD+FUSTissue obtained on day of intervention (Day 1). All CK8 cell viability staining was performed within 2 months of sampling.
Post-LTLD+FUS tissue from the targeted liver tumours was obtained by biopsy at the time of the intervention, between 24/03/2015 and 29/03/2017. Cytokeratin-8 (CK-8) is a cell viability marker which if present, demonstrates lack of ablative cell death by any ablative modality, including FUS. Not all histological cell types express CK8, thus if the Post-LTLD+FUS it may either indicate: i) Non-CK8 expression ii) Thermal ablation and consequent cell death. Note there was uncertainty about CK8 expression of individual patient tumours prior to recruitment. In this study if the Post-LTLD+FUS tissue shows specific cellular CK8 cellular staining, then it demonstrates that i) the tumour is CK8+, and, ii) the tumour was not instantaneously thermally ablated and any subsequent cell death is likely due to drug delivery/chemo-ablation. For more information see key TARDOX Lancet Oncology publication and Cytokeratin 8 reference (both detailed in References section).
SecondaryPatients With Significant (Grade 3-5) Adverse Event(s) Deemed Related to ThermoDox (LTLD)Up to 30 days post-intervention (Day 1-30)
Adverse Events are listed separately in the subsequent results, but were also specified as a secondary endpoint in the a priori protocol and thus significant events are summarised here. 'Definitely' or 'Probably' related events are included.
SecondaryPatients With Significant (Grade 3-5) Adverse Event(s) Deemed Related to FUS ProcedureUp to 30 days post-intervention (Day 1-30)
Adverse Events are listed separately in the subsequent results, but were also specified as a secondary endpoint in the a priori protocol and thus significant events are summarised here. 'Definitely' or 'Probably' related events are included.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Concentration of Total Intratumoral Doxorubicin in Liver Tumour (Biopsies) Following Targeted Release of Doxorubicin From ThermoDox® ('Drug') Using Mild Hyperthermia Generated Non-invasively by Focused Ultrasound (FUS)
Post-intervention sample (Day 1) compared to pre-intervention sample (Day 1)ug/g of total doxorubicin(tumour biopsy)MEAN
PRIMARYPatients Demonstrating >Two-fold Increase in the Amount of Intratumoural Doxorubicin Before and After Focused UltrasoundPost-LTLD+FUS sample (Day 1) compared to Post-LTLD sample (Day 1)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARY
(Part I Only) Achievement of Satisfactory Hyperthermia Within the Target Liver Tumour for a Range of Participant Body Mass Indices (BMIs) and Tumour Locations Within the Liver (Optimal FUS Exposure Parameters)
Real-time thermometry monitoring during intervention (Day 1)In Part II there was no real-time thermometry and this endpoint only applies to Part I patients.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPersistence of Cell Viability Stain Post-LTLD+FUSTissue obtained on day of intervention (Day 1). All CK8 cell viability staining was performed within 2 months of sampling.
5/6 Part I patients and 4/4 Part II patients had tissue which was analysable for CK-8. The Outcome Measure Data Table demonstrates the number of patients from each arm having CK-8 positive tumour biopsy samples post-LTLD+FUS, indicating lack of thermal ablation (which is consistent with desired hyperthermia rather than undesirable FUS ablation).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPatients With Significant (Grade 3-5) Adverse Event(s) Deemed Related to ThermoDox (LTLD)Up to 30 days post-intervention (Day 1-30)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPatients With Significant (Grade 3-5) Adverse Event(s) Deemed Related to FUS ProcedureUp to 30 days post-intervention (Day 1-30)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group13

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Concentration of Total Intratumoral Doxorubicin in Liver Tumour (Biopsies) Following Targeted Release of Doxorubicin From ThermoDox® ('Drug') Using Mild Hyperthermia Generated Non-invasively by Focused Ultrasound (FUS)
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)Pre-FUS Intratumoural Doxorubicin Concentration2.34Standard Deviation 0.93ug/g of total doxorubicin(tumour biopsy)
Concentration of Total Intratumoral Doxorubicin in Liver Tumour (Biopsies) Following Targeted Release of Doxorubicin From ThermoDox® ('Drug') Using Mild Hyperthermia Generated Non-invasively by Focused Ultrasound (FUS)
Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)Pre-FUS Intratumoural Doxorubicin Concentration2.34Standard Deviation 0.93ug/g of total doxorubicin(tumour biopsy)
Concentration of Total Intratumoral Doxorubicin in Liver Tumour (Biopsies) Following Targeted Release of Doxorubicin From ThermoDox® ('Drug') Using Mild Hyperthermia Generated Non-invasively by Focused Ultrasound (FUS)
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)Post-FUS Intratumoural Doxorubicin Concentration7.74Standard Deviation 4.09ug/g of total doxorubicin(tumour biopsy)
Concentration of Total Intratumoral Doxorubicin in Liver Tumour (Biopsies) Following Targeted Release of Doxorubicin From ThermoDox® ('Drug') Using Mild Hyperthermia Generated Non-invasively by Focused Ultrasound (FUS)
Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)Post-FUS Intratumoural Doxorubicin Concentration9.8Standard Deviation 8.12ug/g of total doxorubicin(tumour biopsy)
Patients Demonstrating >Two-fold Increase in the Amount of Intratumoural Doxorubicin Before and After Focused UltrasoundPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)4Participants
Patients Demonstrating >Two-fold Increase in the Amount of Intratumoural Doxorubicin Before and After Focused UltrasoundPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)3Participants
(Part I Only) Achievement of Satisfactory Hyperthermia Within the Target Liver Tumour for a Range of Participant Body Mass Indices (BMIs) and Tumour Locations Within the Liver (Optimal FUS Exposure Parameters)
Part I (July 2014-July 2017)5Participants
Persistence of Cell Viability Stain Post-LTLD+FUSPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)5Participants
Persistence of Cell Viability Stain Post-LTLD+FUSPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)3Participants
Patients With Significant (Grade 3-5) Adverse Event(s) Deemed Related to ThermoDox (LTLD)Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)3Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)6
Overall StudySTARTEDPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)4
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)0

Adverse events50

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDysphoniaSurgical and medical proceduresPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)06
otherDysphoniaSurgical and medical proceduresPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)14
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)06
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)14
otherFatigue or LethargyGeneral disordersPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)46
otherFatigue or LethargyGeneral disordersPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)24
otherNauseaGeneral disordersPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)26
otherNauseaGeneral disordersPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)24
otherAbdominal PainGeneral disordersPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)16
otherAbdominal PainGeneral disordersPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)24

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)04
Total, other adverse eventsPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)66
Total, other adverse eventsPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)44
Total, serious adverse eventsPart I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017)36
Total, serious adverse eventsPart II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017)34

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20950219BACKGROUNDPubMed
29118984BACKGROUNDPubMed
30001990RESULTPubMed
30644817RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017) vs Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017): Patients With Significant (Grade 3-5) Adverse Event(s) Deemed Related to ThermoDox (LTLD)
Trial comparisons
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017) vs Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017): Persistence of Cell Viability Stain Post-LTLD+FUSTrial comparisons
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017) vs Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017): Patients With Significant (Grade 3-5) Adverse Event(s) Deemed Related to FUS Procedure
Trial comparisons
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017) vs Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017) vs Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017): Patients Demonstrating >Two-fold Increase in the Amount of Intratumoural Doxorubicin Before and After Focused Ultrasound
Trial comparisons
Part I (Patients Enrolled Between March 2015-April 2017) vs Part II (Patients Enrolled Between June 2016-Feb 2017): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02181075

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02181075/events?page=2