ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02195583

The Effect of Experimental Dentifrices on Remineralization of Caries Lesions In-situ

NCT02195583, Not applicable, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2015-04-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Effect of Experimental Dentifrices on Remineralization of Caries Lesions In-situ. Trials, record NCT02195583. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02195583

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Effect of Experimental Dentifrices on Remineralization of Caries Lesions In-situ
NCT number
NCT02195583
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
62 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Oral Hygiene
Interventions
Sodium fluoride (1426 ppm), Sodium fluoride (1150 ppm), Sodium fluoride (250 ppm), Sodium fluoride (1426 ppm) + zinc base A, Sodium fluoride (1426 ppm) + zinc base B, Fluoride (0 ppm)
First posted
2014-07-21
Last updated
2015-05-01
Results first posted
2015-04-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Baseline to 4 hours
Changes in the mineral content of the four centrally-located enamel specimens were evaluated using the Surface Microhardness (SMH) Test. The SMH was measured using a Wilson 2100 Hardness Tester. The baseline SMH was determined prior to the in vitro acid challenge. SMH was determined again after the in vitro acid challenge, after the in situ remineralization test, and again after the second in vitro acid challenge. The extent of remineralization was calculated as the % recovery in SMH using the equation: % SMHR= \[(D1-R)/(D1-B)\]\*100 Where B = indentation length (μm) of sound enamel at baseline; D1 = indentation length (μm) after first acid challenge; R = indentation length (μm) after in situ remineralization.
SecondaryEnamel Fluoride UptakeBaseline to 4 hours
The microdrill enamel biopsy technique was used to analyze the fluoride uptake by enamel. Each enamel specimen was mounted on the long axis of a drill attached to a microdrill and drilled to a depth of approximately 100 micrometer (μm) through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen). The enamel powder pooled from four drilling sample was then immediately analyzed for fluoride content using fluoride specific electrode and pH/ion meter. The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as microgram per square centimeter (μg/cm\^2).
SecondaryPercentage Net Acid Resistance (% NAR)Baseline to 4 hours
Changes in the mineral content of the four centrally-located enamel specimens were evaluated using the SMH Test. The SMH was measured using a Wilson 2100 Hardness Tester. The baseline SMH was measured prior to the in vitro acid challenge. SMH was measured again after the in vitro acid challenge, after the in situ remineralization test, and again after the second in vitro acid challenge. The % NAR was calculated using the equation: % NAR= \[(D1-D2)/(D1-B)\]\*100 where B= Indentation length (μm) of sound enamel at baseline; D1= Indentation length (μm) after first acid challenge and D2= Indentation length (μm) after second acid challenge.
SecondaryPercentage Comparative Acid Resistance (% CAR)Baseline to 4 hours
Changes in the mineral content of the four centrally-located enamel specimens were evaluated using the SMH Test. The SMH was measured using a Wilson 2100 Hardness Tester. The baseline SMH was measured prior to the in vitro acid challenge. SMH was measured again after the in vitro acid challenge, after the in situ remineralization test, and again after the second in vitro acid challenge. The % CAR was calculated using the equation: % CAR= \[(D2-R)/(D1-B)\]\*100 where B= Indentation length (μm) of sound enamel at baseline; R= Indentation length (μm) of enamel after in situ remineralization; D1= Indentation length (μm) after first acid challenge; D2= Indentation length (μm) after second acid challenge.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Baseline to 4 hours
The primary population for the efficacy analysis was the Per Protocol (PP) population, including participants with a protocol violation affecting some (but not all) of the efficacy assessments. However, data from assessments when a violation occurred were excluded.
Percentage of SMHRLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYEnamel Fluoride UptakeBaseline to 4 hours
The main population for the secondary efficacy analysis was the PP population, including participants with a protocol violation affecting some (but not all) of the efficacy assessments. However, data from assessments when a violation occurred were excluded.
microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Net Acid Resistance (% NAR)Baseline to 4 hours
The main population for the secondary efficacy analysis was the PP population, including participants with a protocol violation affecting some (but not all) of the efficacy assessments. However, data from assessments when a violation occurred were excluded.
Percentage of NARLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Comparative Acid Resistance (% CAR)Baseline to 4 hours
The main population for the secondary efficacy analysis was the PP population, including participants with a protocol violation affecting some (but not all) of the efficacy assessments. However, data from assessments when a violation occurred were excluded.
Percentage of CARLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Sodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm)32.49Standard Error 1.167Percentage of SMHR
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Sodium Fluoride (1150 Ppm)31.81Standard Error 1.182Percentage of SMHR
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Sodium Fluoride (250 Ppm)27.56Standard Error 1.199Percentage of SMHR
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Sodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base A22.62Standard Error 1.175Percentage of SMHR
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Sodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base B23.22Standard Error 1.159Percentage of SMHR
Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (% SMHR)Sodium Fluoride (0 Ppm)24.78Standard Error 1.167Percentage of SMHR
Enamel Fluoride UptakeSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm)2.94Standard Error 0.083microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)
Enamel Fluoride UptakeSodium Fluoride (1150 Ppm)2.70Standard Error 0.084microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)
Enamel Fluoride UptakeSodium Fluoride (250 Ppm)1.85Standard Error 0.085microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)
Enamel Fluoride UptakeSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base A2.62Standard Error 0.083microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOverall Participants62
Overall StudySodium Fluoride (1150 Ppm)Overall Participants57
Overall StudySodium Fluoride (0 Ppm)Overall Participants59
Overall StudySodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base AOverall Participants58
Overall StudySodium Fluoride (250 Ppm)Overall Participants55
Overall StudySodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm)Overall Participants59
Overall StudySodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base BOverall Participants60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOverall Participants53
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOverall Participants9

Adverse events84

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherOral Mucosal ErythemaGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm)259
otherOral Mucosal ErythemaGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (1150 Ppm)057
otherOral Mucosal ErythemaGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (250 Ppm)055
otherOral Mucosal ErythemaGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base A058
otherOral Mucosal ErythemaGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base B160
otherOral Mucosal ErythemaGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (0 Ppm)259
otherAbdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm)059
otherAbdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (1150 Ppm)057
otherAbdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (250 Ppm)155
otherAbdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disordersSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base A058

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm)
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Fluoride (1150 Ppm)
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Fluoride (250 Ppm)
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base A
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base B
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Fluoride (0 Ppm)
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm)359
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Fluoride (1150 Ppm)157
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Fluoride (250 Ppm)555
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Fluoride (1426 Ppm) + Zinc Base A158

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02195583

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02195583/results?page=2