ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02203331

Bay98-7196, Dose Finding / POC Study

NCT02203331, Phase 2, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2018-01-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Bay98-7196, Dose Finding / POC Study. Trials, record NCT02203331. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02203331

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Bay98-7196, Dose Finding / POC Study
NCT number
NCT02203331
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
319 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Endometriosis
Interventions
Placebo, Levonorgestrel, Anastrozole, Lupron / Leuprolide acetate
First posted
2014-07-29
Last updated
2023-11-07
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-005090-53
Results first posted
2018-01-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), end of treatment (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84)
Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, participants were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain of the 7 days with worst EAPP within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 on 7 days with worst EAPP within that 28-day window divided by 7.
Secondary
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56)
Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain of the 7 days with worst EAPP within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 on 7 days with worst EAPP within that 28-day window divided by 7.
Secondary
Absolute Change in Mean Pain From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day1-28), Second Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day29-56),Third Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56), and third cycle (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84)
Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 within that 28-day window divided by the number with non-missing days within that 28-day window. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category.
Secondary
Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)
Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=7 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that 28-day window where item 1 of the ESD was \>=7.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESDBaseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)
Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=7 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that 28-day window where item 1 of the ESD was \>=7. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category.
SecondaryPercentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESDBaseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)
Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=4 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that window where Item 1 of the ESD was \>=4. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESDBaseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)
Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=4 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that window where Item 1 of the ESD was \>=4. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), end of treatment (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84)
The dose-response analysis was performed using the MCP-Mod method with groups containing LNG, ATZ + LNG, and Placebo. It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARY
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56)It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARY
Absolute Change in Mean Pain From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day1-28), Second Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day29-56),Third Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56), and third cycle (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84)
It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARY
Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint.percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESDBaseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint.percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESDBaseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint.percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESDBaseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3)It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint.percentage of daysMEAN

Results by group114

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-1.8974Standard Deviation 1.6416units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-1.6061Standard Deviation 1.6652units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-2.4014Standard Deviation 2.1833units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection-2.2653Standard Deviation 1.5972units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection-3.7679Standard Deviation 2.3507units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection-2.293Standard Deviation 1.8247units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo InjectionChange at Treatment 1-0.7582Standard Deviation 1.1518units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo InjectionChange at Treatment 1-0.6849Standard Deviation 1.3832units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo InjectionChange at Treatment 1-1.1463Standard Deviation 1.3992units on a scale
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD
ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo InjectionChange at Treatment 1-1.0000Standard Deviation 1.2579units on a scale

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection52
Overall StudySTARTEDATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection53
Overall StudySTARTEDATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection55
Overall StudySTARTEDATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection53
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection53
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo IVR + Placebo Injection53
Overall StudyTreatedLNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection49
Overall StudyTreatedATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection50
Overall StudyTreatedATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection54
Overall StudyTreatedATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection49

Adverse events1,326

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection149
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection150
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection054
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection049
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection050
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo IVR + Placebo Injection153
otherHaemorrhagic disorderBlood and lymphatic system disordersLNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection049
otherHaemorrhagic disorderBlood and lymphatic system disordersATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection050
otherHaemorrhagic disorderBlood and lymphatic system disordersATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection054
otherHaemorrhagic disorderBlood and lymphatic system disordersATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection149

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection
Total, all-cause mortalityATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection
Total, all-cause mortalityATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection
Total, all-cause mortalityATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo IVR + Placebo Injection
Total, other adverse eventsLNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection3849
Total, other adverse eventsATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection4050
Total, other adverse eventsATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection4054
Total, other adverse eventsATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection3549

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02203331

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02203331/results?page=2