Trial ยท NCT02203331
Bay98-7196, Dose Finding / POC Study
NCT02203331, Phase 2, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2018-01-04
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Bay98-7196, Dose Finding / POC Study. Trials, record NCT02203331. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02203331
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Bay98-7196, Dose Finding / POC Study
- NCT number
- NCT02203331
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 319 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Bayer
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Interventions
- Placebo, Levonorgestrel, Anastrozole, Lupron / Leuprolide acetate
- First posted
- 2014-07-29
- Last updated
- 2023-11-07
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2013-005090-53
- Results first posted
- 2018-01-04
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes7
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), end of treatment (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84) | Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, participants were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain of the 7 days with worst EAPP within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 on 7 days with worst EAPP within that 28-day window divided by 7. |
| Secondary | Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56) | Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain of the 7 days with worst EAPP within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 on 7 days with worst EAPP within that 28-day window divided by 7. |
| Secondary | Absolute Change in Mean Pain From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day1-28), Second Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day29-56),Third Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56), and third cycle (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84) | Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The mean pain within a 28-day window was calculated as the sum of ESD item 1 within that 28-day window divided by the number with non-missing days within that 28-day window. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=7 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that 28-day window where item 1 of the ESD was \>=7. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=7 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that 28-day window where item 1 of the ESD was \>=7. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=4 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that window where Item 1 of the ESD was \>=4. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point (0-10) NRS by question 1. In question 1, subjects were asked to rate the pain in the target area during the past 24 hours, where 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain and responses were recorded in ESD. The percentage of days with pain \>=4 within a 28-day window was calculated as 100 divided by the number of non-missing days within that 28-day window multiplied by the number of days within that window where Item 1 of the ESD was \>=4. Here, number of subjects 'n' signifies evaluable subjects for the respective category. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes7
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), end of treatment (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84) | The dose-response analysis was performed using the MCP-Mod method with groups containing LNG, ATZ + LNG, and Placebo. It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint. | units on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56) | It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint. | units on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Absolute Change in Mean Pain From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day1-28), Second Cycle Under Study Treatment(Day29-56),Third Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), first cycle (Treatment 1) (Day 1-28), second cycle (Treatment 2) (Day 29-56), and third cycle (Treatment 3) (last 28 days of the treatment period, Day 57-84) | It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint. | units on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint. | percentage of days | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=7 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint. | percentage of days | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Days During Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) and Cycles 1, 2, and 3 With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint. | percentage of days | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to Cycle 1, 2, and 3 in Percentage of Days With Pain >=4 as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Baseline (last 28 days before randomization), Cycle 1 (Treatment 1), Cycle 2 (Treatment 2), and Cycle 3 (Treatment 3) | It was analyzed using the per-protocol set (PPS) with evaluable participants for this endpoint. | percentage of days | MEAN |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group114
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | -1.8974 | Standard Deviation 1.6416 | units on a scale | |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | -1.6061 | Standard Deviation 1.6652 | units on a scale | |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | -2.4014 | Standard Deviation 2.1833 | units on a scale | |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | -2.2653 | Standard Deviation 1.5972 | units on a scale | |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection | -3.7679 | Standard Deviation 2.3507 | units on a scale | |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to End of Treatment (Last 28 Days of Treatment Period, Days 57-84) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection | -2.293 | Standard Deviation 1.8247 | units on a scale | |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | Change at Treatment 1 | -0.7582 | Standard Deviation 1.1518 | units on a scale |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | Change at Treatment 1 | -0.6849 | Standard Deviation 1.3832 | units on a scale |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | Change at Treatment 1 | -1.1463 | Standard Deviation 1.3992 | units on a scale |
Absolute Change in Mean Pain of the 7 Days With Worst EAPP From Baseline (Last 28 Days Before Randomization) to First Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 1-28) and to Second Cycle Under Study Treatment (Day 29-56) as Measured on NRS by Question 1 of ESD | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | Change at Treatment 1 | -1.0000 | Standard Deviation 1.2579 | units on a scale |
1 to 10 of 114Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 114 results by groupParticipant flow24
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 52 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 53 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 55 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 53 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection | 53 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection | 53 | |
| Overall Study | Treated | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 49 | |
| Overall Study | Treated | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 50 | |
| Overall Study | Treated | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 54 | |
| Overall Study | Treated | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 49 |
1 to 10 of 24Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 24 participant flowAdverse events1,326
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 1 | 49 | |
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 1 | 50 | |
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 0 | 54 | |
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 0 | 49 | |
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection | 0 | 50 | |
| other | Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection | 1 | 53 | |
| other | Haemorrhagic disorder | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 0 | 49 | |
| other | Haemorrhagic disorder | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 0 | 50 | |
| other | Haemorrhagic disorder | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 0 | 54 | |
| other | Haemorrhagic disorder | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 1 | 49 |
1 to 10 of 1,326Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 1,326 adverse eventsAdverse event totals18
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo IVR + Leuprorelin Injection | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo IVR + Placebo Injection | ||
| Total, other adverse events | LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 38 | 49 |
| Total, other adverse events | ATZ 300 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 40 | 50 |
| Total, other adverse events | ATZ 600 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 40 | 54 |
| Total, other adverse events | ATZ 1050 mcg / LNG 40 mcg IVR + Placebo Injection | 35 | 49 |
1 to 10 of 18Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 18 adverse event totalsPapers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02203331
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02203331/results?page=2