ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02208466

Effects rTMS Combined With Fluoxetine on Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients

NCT02208466, Phase 2, Completed, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital; results first posted 2021-02-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effects rTMS Combined With Fluoxetine on Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients. Trials, record NCT02208466. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02208466

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effects rTMS Combined With Fluoxetine on Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients
NCT number
NCT02208466
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
44 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Conditions
Stroke, Motor Function
Interventions
Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), Fluoxetine, Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Placebo Fluoxetine
First posted
2014-08-05
Last updated
2021-02-21
Results first posted
2021-02-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChanges in Motor Function (Jebsen-Taylor Task)baseline and 90 days
Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test: measures hand function in real-life activities, by evaluating the time required to perform 7 different tasks. We used the non-constrained hand for the assessments. The sum of the different tasks was used for the analysis. Calculation details: value at 9 months minus value at baseline, change in seconds (adjusted mean difference).
PrimaryChanges in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) Scalebaseline and 90 days
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation, and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. We used the upper limb motor function subscale: minimum values= 0 ; maximum values= 66. Higher scores mean a better outcome. Changes from baseline to 90 days (value at 90 days minus value at baseline).
SecondaryChanges in Cortical Excitability MeasuresBaseline and 90 days
We will measure cortical excitability using single-pulsed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after stimulation at three different time-points. Changes from baseline to 90 days (value at 90 days minus value at baseline).

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChanges in Motor Function (Jebsen-Taylor Task)baseline and 90 daysPerformed by a rater blinded to rTMS and pharmacotherapy performed all assessmentssecondsMEAN
PRIMARYChanges in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) Scalebaseline and 90 daysPerformed by a rater blinded to rTMS and pharmacotherapy performed all assessmentsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChanges in Cortical Excitability MeasuresBaseline and 90 daysPerformed by a rater blinded to rTMS and pharmacotherapy performed all assessmentsmotor evoked potential (mV)MEAN

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Changes in Motor Function (Jebsen-Taylor Task)Active rTMS/Active Fluoxetine-214.3395% Confidence Interval -289.32 to -139.35seconds
Changes in Motor Function (Jebsen-Taylor Task)Sham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine-50.1695% Confidence Interval -110.56 to -10.24seconds
Changes in Motor Function (Jebsen-Taylor Task)Sham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine-117.9895% Confidence Interval -197.39 to -38.58seconds
Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) ScaleActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine10.1095% Confidence Interval 4.06 to 16.14units on a scale
Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) ScaleSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine6.7395% Confidence Interval 1.28 to 12.17units on a scale
Changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) ScaleSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine15.5595% Confidence Interval 9.16 to 21.95units on a scale
Changes in Cortical Excitability MeasuresActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine-0.0595% Confidence Interval -0.34 to 0.08motor evoked potential (mV)
Changes in Cortical Excitability MeasuresSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine-0.1295% Confidence Interval -0.33 to 0.43motor evoked potential (mV)
Changes in Cortical Excitability MeasuresSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine0.3395% Confidence Interval 0.07 to 1.16motor evoked potential (mV)

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine9
Overall StudySTARTEDSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine10
Overall StudySTARTEDSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine9
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine0

Adverse events3

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine293
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine0100
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine386

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine09
Total, all-cause mortalitySham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine010
Total, all-cause mortalitySham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine08
Total, other adverse eventsActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine29
Total, other adverse eventsSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine010
Total, other adverse eventsSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine38
Total, serious adverse eventsActive rTMS/Active Fluoxetine09
Total, serious adverse eventsSham rTMS/Active Fluoxetine010
Total, serious adverse eventsSham rTMS/Placebo Fluoxetine08

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31286828DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02208466

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02208466/registered