ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02216071

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofloxacin 0.3% and Dexamethasone 0.1% in Acute Otitis Externa

NCT02216071, Phase 3, Completed, Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC.; results first posted 2021-05-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofloxacin 0.3% and Dexamethasone 0.1% in Acute Otitis Externa. Trials, record NCT02216071. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02216071

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofloxacin 0.3% and Dexamethasone 0.1% in Acute Otitis Externa
NCT number
NCT02216071
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
499 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC.
Conditions
Acute Otitis Externa
Interventions
Ciprodex®, EXL CDOS (Ciprofloxacin 0.3% and Dexamethasone 0.1%) Sterile Otic Suspension
First posted
2014-08-13
Last updated
2021-05-28
Results first posted
2021-05-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Cure of AOE7 days after the completion of therapy; at Day 15 (+/- 1 day)
The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical cure of AOE, defined as the proportion of subjects with a clinical AOE score of 0 at the TOC Visit. Subjects with AOE in both ears were considered to have achieved clinical cure of AOE if the clinical AOE score was 0 for both ears. The clinical AOE score was defined as the sum of scores for inflammation and edema (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and tenderness and otorrhea (0=absent, 1=present).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Microbiological Cure (MC)7 days after the completion of therapy; at Day 15 (+/- 1 day)
The secondary efficacy endpoint was the microbiological cure of AOE, defined as the proportion of subjects with microbiological cure at the TOC Visit. Subjects with AOE in both ears were considered to have achieved microbiological cure if microbiological cure was achieved in both ears.
OtherNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsEach monitoring visit through 15 +/- 1 daysSafety outcomes evaluated * AEs

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Cure of AOE7 days after the completion of therapy; at Day 15 (+/- 1 day)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Microbiological Cure (MC)7 days after the completion of therapy; at Day 15 (+/- 1 day)The number of participants analyzed represents Bacteria-Positive cohort of subjectsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsEach monitoring visit through 15 +/- 1 days
499 subjects were randomized as the ITT population, 245 in the EXL CDOS arm \& 254 in the RLD arm. All were included in the safety population, but randomization was modified for 36 subjects in the EXL CDOS arm and 43 subjects in the RLD arm to account for available supply of study drug, making 252 subjects in the EXL CDOS arm \& 247 in the RLD arm.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure of AOECiprodex®, RLD190Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure of AOEEXL CDOS191Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Cure (MC)Ciprodex®, RLD115Participants
Number of Participants With Microbiological Cure (MC)EXL CDOS117Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsCiprodex®, RLD60Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsEXL CDOS67Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCiprodex®, RLD254
Overall StudySTARTEDEXL CDOS245
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCiprodex®, RLD239
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEXL CDOS233
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCiprodex®, RLD15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEXL CDOS12

Adverse events28

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEar and labyrinth disorderEar and labyrinth disordersCiprodex®, RLD18247
otherEar and labyrinth disorderEar and labyrinth disordersEXL CDOS15252
otherPhotophobiaEye disordersCiprodex®, RLD0247
otherPhotophobiaEye disordersEXL CDOS1252
otherGastrointestinalGastrointestinal disordersCiprodex®, RLD1247
otherGastrointestinalGastrointestinal disordersEXL CDOS2252
otherGeneral disorder and administration site conditionsGeneral disordersCiprodex®, RLD3247
otherGeneral disorder and administration site conditionsGeneral disordersEXL CDOS1252
otherInfections and InfestationsInfections and infestationsCiprodex®, RLD13247
otherInfections and InfestationsInfections and infestationsEXL CDOS18252

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCiprodex®, RLD
Total, all-cause mortalityEXL CDOS
Total, other adverse eventsCiprodex®, RLD47247
Total, other adverse eventsEXL CDOS42252
Total, serious adverse eventsCiprodex®, RLD0247
Total, serious adverse eventsEXL CDOS1252

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ciprodex®, RLD vs EXL CDOS: Number of Participants With Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
Ciprodex®, RLD vs EXL CDOS: Number of Participants With Clinical Cure of AOETrial comparisons
Ciprodex®, RLD vs EXL CDOS: Number of Participants With Microbiological Cure (MC)Trial comparisons
Ciprodex®, RLD vs EXL CDOS: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02216071

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02216071/events?page=2