ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02220894

Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-042/KEYNOTE-042)

NCT02220894, Phase 3, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2019-03-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-042/KEYNOTE-042). Trials, record NCT02220894. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02220894

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Participants With Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-042/KEYNOTE-042)
NCT number
NCT02220894
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,274 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
pembrolizumab, carboplatin, paclitaxel, pemetrexed
First posted
2014-08-20
Last updated
2026-06-25
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-001473-14
Results first posted
2019-03-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%Up to approximately 44 months
OS was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥50% and was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the interim analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was OS in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The OS for participants with a TPS ≥50% is presented.
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%Up to approximately 44 months
OS was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥20% and was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the interim analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was OS in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The OS for participants with a TPS ≥20% is presented.
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%Up to approximately 44 months
OS was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥1% and was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the interim analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was OS in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The OS for participants with a TPS ≥1% is presented.
Secondary
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%
Up to approximately 44 months
PFS was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥50% and was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was PFS in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The PFS for participants with a TPS ≥50% is presented.
Secondary
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%
Up to approximately 44 months
PFS was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥20% and was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was PFS in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The PFS for participants with a TPS ≥20% is presented.
Secondary
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%
Up to approximately 44 months
PFS was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥1% and was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was PFS in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The PFS for participants with a TPS ≥1% is presented.
Secondary
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%
Up to approximately 44 months
ORR was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥50%. ORR was determined per RECIST 1.1 and was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters) per RECIST 1.1. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was ORR in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The percentage of participants who had a TPS ≥50% and who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
Secondary
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%
Up to approximately 44 months
ORR was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥20%. ORR was determined per RECIST 1.1 and was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters) per RECIST 1.1. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was ORR in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The percentage of participants who had a TPS ≥20% and who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
Secondary
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%
Up to approximately 44 months
ORR was determined for participants with a TPS of ≥1%. ORR was determined per RECIST 1.1 and was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters) per RECIST 1.1. The efficacy hypothesis was analyzed using a sequential testing strategy that involved testing a hypothesis only if the superiority of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy was established for all the preceding hypotheses. The order of testing was ORR in participants with TPS≥50%, then with TPS≥20%, and finally with TPS≥1%. The percentage of participants who had a TPS ≥1% and who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 38 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥50%.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥20%.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥1%.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%
Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥50%.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%
Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥20%.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%
Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥1%.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%
Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥50%.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%
Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥20%.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%
Up to approximately 44 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who were alive at the time of randomization and had a TPS of ≥1%.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 38 monthsThe analysis population consisted of all participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group22

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%Pembrolizumab20.095% Confidence Interval 15.9 to 24.2Months
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%Chemotherapy (SOC Treatment)12.295% Confidence Interval 10.4 to 14.6Months
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%Pembrolizumab18.095% Confidence Interval 15.4 to 21.9Months
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%Chemotherapy (SOC Treatment)13.095% Confidence Interval 11.6 to 15.3Months
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%Pembrolizumab16.495% Confidence Interval 14.0 to 19.7Months
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥1%Chemotherapy (SOC Treatment)12.195% Confidence Interval 11.3 to 13.3Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%
Pembrolizumab6.595% Confidence Interval 5.9 to 8.5Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%
Chemotherapy (SOC Treatment)6.495% Confidence Interval 6.2 to 7.2Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%
Pembrolizumab6.295% Confidence Interval 5.1 to 7.4Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥20%
Chemotherapy (SOC Treatment)6.795% Confidence Interval 6.3 to 8.0Months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab637
Overall StudySTARTEDChemotherapy (Standard of Care [SOC] Treatment)637
Overall StudyTreatedPembrolizumab636
Overall StudyTreatedChemotherapy (Standard of Care [SOC] Treatment)615
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDChemotherapy (Standard of Care [SOC] Treatment)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPembrolizumab637
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDChemotherapy (Standard of Care [SOC] Treatment)637

Adverse events912

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab102636124
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy (SOC Treatment)253615332
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab Second Course2342
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab1063617
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy (SOC Treatment)3561563
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab Second Course1341
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab66369
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersChemotherapy (SOC Treatment)85615177
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab Second Course0340
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab66367

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab528637
Total, all-cause mortalityChemotherapy (SOC Treatment)582637
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab Second Course1834
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab535636
Total, other adverse eventsChemotherapy (SOC Treatment)577615
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab Second Course2134
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab261636
Total, serious adverse eventsChemotherapy (SOC Treatment)193615
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab Second Course834

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30955977DERIVEDPubMed
31610828DERIVEDPubMed
33231285DERIVEDPubMed
35073727DERIVEDPubMed
36306479DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Pembrolizumab vs Chemotherapy (SOC Treatment): Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
Pembrolizumab vs Chemotherapy (SOC Treatment): Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02220894

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02220894/results?page=2