ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02229942

B-lymphocyte Depletion Using Rituximab in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME). A Randomized Phase-III Study.

NCT02229942, Phase 3, Completed, Haukeland University Hospital

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. B-lymphocyte Depletion Using Rituximab in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME). A Randomized Phase-III Study. Trials, record NCT02229942. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02229942

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
B-lymphocyte Depletion Using Rituximab in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalopathy (CFS/ME). A Randomized Phase-III Study.
NCT number
NCT02229942
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
151 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Haukeland University Hospital
Conditions
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalitis (CFS/ME)
Interventions
Rituximab, Placebo
First posted
2014-09-03
Last updated
2021-05-11
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-000795-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryFatigue score, selfreported.Course of Fatigue score during 24 months follow-up.
Selfreported Fatigue score is registered every second week, as the mean score for the four symptoms: "Post-exertional malaise", "Fatigue", "Need for rest", "Daily functioning" (scale 0-6). Mean Fatigue scores for the time intervals 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-16, 16-20, 20-24 months are recorded for each patient. These data are used for statistical analysis. The difference in course of Fatigue score during 24 months follow-up, between the rituximab and placebo groups, will constitute the primary endpoint. Overall response is recorded as the effect on CFS/ME symptoms during 24 months follow-up. The overall response is not predefined to a specific time interval, but is defined as mean Fatigue score at least 4.5 for at least 8 consecutive weeks for moderate response, and mean Fatigue score at least 5.0 for at least 8 consecutive weeks for major response. Single response periods and the sum of response periods during 24 months follow-up will be recorded.
SecondaryShort Form-36 (SF-36)Changes in SF-36 scores during 24 months follow-up
SF-36 (ver 1.2) are selfreported by patients at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months follow-up. Changes in Physical health summary score, Physical function, and "Mean of five subdimensions" (Physical function, Bodily pain, Vitality, Social function, General health) are recorded. The difference in course during 24 months follow-up, between the rituximab and placebo groups, will constitute secondary endpoints. Also, the difference between rituximab and placebo groups, in changes from baseline to recording at 18 months, for Physical health summary score, Physical function, and "mean of five SF-36 subdimensions", constitute secondary endpoints.
SecondaryPhysical activity (Sensewear armband)Analyzed at baseline and at interval 17-21 months
The patients' physical activity level, in a home setting for 7 consecutive days, is recorded using Sensewear armbands, with registration at baseline and repeated in the time interval 17-21 months follow-up. Changes from baseline to analysis during the time interval 17-21 months, for mean number of steps per 24h, maximum number of steps per 24h, mean duration per 24h with activity level at least 3.5 METs, max duration per 24h with activity level at least 3.5 METs, are recorded. The difference between rituximab and placebo groups will constitute secondary endpoints.
SecondarySelf-recorded "Function level"Course during 24 months follow-up
Self-recorded "Function level" (scale 0-100, compared to healthy state, according to a set of examples) are registered every second week. Mean "Function level" for the time intervals 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-16, 16-20, 20-24 months are calculated. The difference in course of "Function level", between the rituximab and placebo groups, constitute a secondary endpoint. Also, the differences between the rituximab and placebo groups, for changes in selfreported "Fatigue score" and in selfreported "Function level", calculated from baseline to the mean value during the time interval 16-20 months, constitute secondary endpoints.
SecondaryFatigue Severity Scale24 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is self-recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24 months. The difference between the rituximab and placebo groups, in changes in FSS from baseline to 18 months follow-up, constitutes a secondary endpoint.
SecondaryClinical response durationDuring 24 months follow-up
Clinical response periods, defined as consecutive self-recorded Fatigue score at least 4.5 (scale 0-6) for a minimum of 8 weeks, during 24 months follow-up, are recorded. The difference in the longest consecutive clinical response period, between rituximab and placebo groups, constitutes a secondary endpoint.
SecondarySustained clinical response at 24 monthsAssessment at 24 monthsThe difference between rituximab and placebo groups, in fraction of patients with sustained clinical response (defined as Fatigue score of at least 4.5) at 24 months, constitute a secondary endpoint.
OtherToxicity and side-effectsDuring 24 months follow-upToxicity and side effects will be recorded throughout 24 months follow-up, as specified in the protocol.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
19566965BACKGROUNDPubMed
22039471BACKGROUNDPubMed
30934066DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02229942

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02229942/registered