ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02243605

Cabozantinib S-malate in Treating Patients With Relapsed Osteosarcoma or Ewing Sarcoma

NCT02243605, Phase 2, Active not recruiting, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2020-09-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cabozantinib S-malate in Treating Patients With Relapsed Osteosarcoma or Ewing Sarcoma. Trials, record NCT02243605. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02243605

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Cabozantinib S-malate in Treating Patients With Relapsed Osteosarcoma or Ewing Sarcoma
NCT number
NCT02243605
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
90 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma, Metastatic Osteosarcoma, Recurrent Ewing Sarcoma, Recurrent Osteosarcoma, Stage III Osteosarcoma AJCC v7, Stage IV Osteosarcoma AJCC v7, Stage IVA Osteosarcoma AJCC v7, Stage IVB Osteosarcoma AJCC v7, Unresectable Ewing Sarcoma, Unresectable Osteosarcoma
Interventions
Cabozantinib S-malate, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
First posted
2014-09-18
Last updated
2026-08-18
Results first posted
2020-09-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNon-progression at 6 Months - OsteosarcomaAt 6 months
Non-progression defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria, revised RECIST v1.1. As per revised RECIST v1.1, progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
PrimaryObjective Response Within 6 Months of Treatment Onset - OsteosarcomaWithin 6 months of treatment onset
Objective response defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria, revised RECIST v1.1. As per revised RECIST v1.1, CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumour marker level of non-target lesions. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis). As per revised RECIST v1.1, PR is defined as a at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters, and non-PD/not all evaluated non-target lesions, or, CR of target lesions and non-CR/non-PD/not evaluated non-target lesions. As per revised RECIST v1.1, progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
PrimaryObjective Response Within 6 Months of Treatment Onset - Ewing SarcomaWithin 6 months of treatment onset
Objective response defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria, revised RECIST v1.1. As per revised RECIST v1.1, CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumour marker level of non-target lesions. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis). As per revised RECIST v1.1, PR is defined as a at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters, and non-PD/not all evaluated non-target lesions, or, CR of target lesions and non-CR/non-PD/not evaluated non-target lesions. As per revised RECIST v1.1, progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
SecondaryBest Overall ResponseFrom the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence. assessed up to 2 years.
Best objective response rate, defined as the rate of CR or PR confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after initial documentation, as determined by investigator review of tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1. Complete or partial responses may be claimed only if the criteria for each are met at a subsequent time point as specified in the protocol (generally 4 weeks later). The BOR is the best response recorded from the start of the study treatment until the end of treatment * Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm * Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters * Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions and also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm * Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)Time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 years
PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression (clinical and/or radiological) or death, whichever occurs first. Radiological progression is assessed by local review of tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 criteria : at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions and also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Time from start of treatment to the time of death, assessed up to 2 yearsOS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to the time of death.
SecondaryNon-progression at 6 Months - Ewing SarcomaAt 6 months
Non-progression defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria, revised RECIST v1.1. As per revised RECIST v1.1, progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
SecondaryIncidence of Adverse EventsSafety profile was continuously followed during treatment and up to 30 days after the last Cabozantinib dose or until the start of a new antitumor therapy, whichever occurs first.Number of patients who had at least one adverse event related to the treatment. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAE (5.0).

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNon-progression at 6 Months - OsteosarcomaAt 6 monthsAll patients eligible and who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles.percentageNUMBER
PRIMARYObjective Response Within 6 Months of Treatment Onset - OsteosarcomaWithin 6 months of treatment onsetAll patients eligible and who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles.percentageNUMBER
PRIMARYObjective Response Within 6 Months of Treatment Onset - Ewing SarcomaWithin 6 months of treatment onsetAll patients eligible and who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles.percentageNUMBER
SECONDARYBest Overall ResponseFrom the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence. assessed up to 2 years.All patients eligible and who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)Time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 yearsAll patients eligible and who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Time from start of treatment to the time of death, assessed up to 2 yearsAll patients eligible and who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNon-progression at 6 Months - Ewing SarcomaAt 6 monthsAll patients eligible and who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles.percentageNUMBER
SECONDARYIncidence of Adverse EventsSafety profile was continuously followed during treatment and up to 30 days after the last Cabozantinib dose or until the start of a new antitumor therapy, whichever occurs first.Adverse event are reported for all treated patients who received at least one administration of treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Non-progression at 6 Months - OsteosarcomaOsteosarcoma33.395% Confidence Interval 19.6 to 49.6percentage
Objective Response Within 6 Months of Treatment Onset - OsteosarcomaOsteosarcoma11.995% Confidence Interval 4.0 to 25.6percentage
Objective Response Within 6 Months of Treatment Onset - Ewing SarcomaEwing Sarcoma25.695% Confidence Interval 13.0 to 42.1percentage
Best Overall ResponseEwing SarcomaPartial response5Participants
Best Overall ResponseOsteosarcomaPartial response3Participants
Best Overall ResponseEwing SarcomaStable disease19Participants
Best Overall ResponseOsteosarcomaStable disease21Participants
Best Overall ResponseEwing SarcomaProgressive disease12Participants
Best Overall ResponseOsteosarcomaProgressive disease15Participants
Best Overall ResponseEwing SarcomaNot evaluable3Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Stage 1 - Interim Analysis PopulationSTARTEDEwing Sarcoma23
Stage 1 - Interim Analysis PopulationSTARTEDOsteosarcoma22
Stage 1 - Interim Analysis PopulationCOMPLETEDEwing Sarcoma21
Stage 1 - Interim Analysis PopulationCOMPLETEDOsteosarcoma21
Stage 1 - Interim Analysis PopulationNOT COMPLETEDEwing Sarcoma2
Stage 1 - Interim Analysis PopulationNOT COMPLETEDOsteosarcoma1
Stage 2 - Final Analysis PopulationSTARTEDEwing Sarcoma45
Stage 2 - Final Analysis PopulationSTARTEDOsteosarcoma45
Stage 2 - Final Analysis PopulationCOMPLETEDEwing Sarcoma39
Stage 2 - Final Analysis PopulationCOMPLETEDOsteosarcoma42

Adverse events260

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOsteosarcoma5457
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEwing Sarcoma6457
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersOsteosarcoma3453
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersEwing Sarcoma4454
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersOsteosarcoma234525
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersEwing Sarcoma214523
otherBlurred visionEye disordersOsteosarcoma1451
otherBlurred visionEye disordersEwing Sarcoma4454
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOsteosarcoma84510
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersEwing Sarcoma124512

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOsteosarcoma4245
Total, all-cause mortalityEwing Sarcoma3745
Total, other adverse eventsOsteosarcoma4545
Total, other adverse eventsEwing Sarcoma4545
Total, serious adverse eventsOsteosarcoma3045
Total, serious adverse eventsEwing Sarcoma3145

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31401903DERIVEDPubMed
32078813DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Osteosarcoma vs Ewing Sarcoma: Incidence of Adverse EventsTrial comparisons
Osteosarcoma vs Ewing Sarcoma: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Osteosarcoma vs Ewing Sarcoma: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02243605

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02243605/events?page=2