ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02245737

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Lanabecestat (LY3314814) in Early Alzheimer's Disease

NCT02245737, Phase 2, Phase 3, Terminated, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2019-08-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Efficacy and Safety Study of Lanabecestat (LY3314814) in Early Alzheimer's Disease. Trials, record NCT02245737. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02245737

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Lanabecestat (LY3314814) in Early Alzheimer's Disease
NCT number
NCT02245737
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
2,218 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Alzheimer´s Disease
Interventions
Lanabecestat, Placebo
First posted
2014-09-22
Last updated
2019-12-03
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-002601-38
Results first posted
2019-08-06
Limitations and caveats
An independent assessment concluded the trial was not likely to meet the primary endpoint upon completion and therefore, trial stopped for futility.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline on the 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13)Baseline, Week 104
ADAS-Cog13 (13-item version of ADAS-Cog) is a psychometric instrument that evaluates word recall, ability to follow commands, constructional praxis, naming, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, memory, comprehension of spoken language, word-finding, and language ability, with a measure of delayed word recall and concentration/ distractibility. The total score of the 13-item scale ranges from 0 to 85, with an increase in score indicating cognitive worsening. Least Squares (LS) mean was determined by mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) model with factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease status at baseline, apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) status, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) use at baseline, pooled country, and covariates for baseline ADAS-Cog13 total score, age at baseline, and baseline ADAS-Cog13 total score-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer´s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory Instrumental Items (ADCS-iADL)Baseline, Week 104
The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item inventory developed as a rater-administered questionnaire answered by the participant's caregiver. The ADCS-ADL measures both basic and instrumental activities of daily living by participants. The range for the ADCS-iADL is 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance. LS Mean was determined by MMRM model with factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease status at baseline, APOE4 status, AChEI use at baseline, pooled country, and covariates for baseline for baseline iADL score, age at baseline, and baseline iADL score-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreBaseline, Week 104
FAQ is a 10-item, caregiver-based questionnaire and was administered to the study partner who was asked to rate the participant's ability to perform a variety of activities ranging from writing checks, assembling tax records, shopping, playing games, food preparation, traveling, keeping appointments, traveling out of neighborhood, keeping track of current events and understanding media. FAQ total score was calculated by adding the scores from each of the 10 items. Each activity is rated on a scale from 0 to 3 (Never did and would have difficulty now = 1; Never did \[the activity\] but could do now = 0; Normal = 0; Has difficulty but does by self = 1; Requires assistance = 2; Dependent = 3). FAQ scale is 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. LS Mean was calculated by MMRM with factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease status at baseline, APOE4 status, AChEI use at baseline and pooled country.
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 104
The iADRS is a composite that measures both cognition and function. The iADRS comprises scores form the ADAS- Cog and the ADCS-iADL. The iADRS is calculated as a linear combination of the total scores of the ADAS-Cog13 (score range 0 to 85 with higher scores reflecting worse performance) and the ADCS-iADL (score range from 0-59 with higher scores reflecting better performance). The iADRS score ranges from 0 to 144 with higher scores indicating greater impairment. LS Mean was determined by MMRM methodology with factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by- visit interaction, disease status at baseline, APOE4 status, AChEI use at baseline, pooled country, and covariates for baseline iADRS13 total score, age at baseline, and baseline iADRS13 total score-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) ScoreBaseline, Week 104
The CDR-SB is a rater administered scale and impairment is scored in of the following categories: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Impairment is scored on a scale in which no dementia = 0, questionable dementia = 0.5, mild dementia = 1, moderate dementia = 2 and severe dementia = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", were added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0-18, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. LS Mean was determined by MMRM methodology with factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease status at baseline, APOE4 status, AChEI use at baseline, pooled country, and covariates for baseline CDR-SB score, age at baseline, and baseline CDR-SB score-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryTime to Progression as Measured by Loss of Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score StageBaseline through Loss of 1 Global Stage or Week 104
The CDR global score is a composite score calculated using the Washington University CDR-assignment algorithm applied to the 6 individual domain box scores (Morris 1993). The memory domain is considered the primary category that drives the CDR global outcome, and all other domains are secondary. The CDR global score ranges from 0 to 3 (0 = no dementia, 0.5 = questionable dementia, 1 = mild dementia, 2 = moderate dementia, 3 = severe dementia).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) ScoreBaseline, Week 104
The NPI is a questionnaire administered to caregivers that quantifies behavioral changes. Each of the 12 behavioral domains the caregiver reports as present are scored for Frequency, scale: 1 (Occasionally) to 4 (Very Frequently), and Severity, scale: 1 (Mild) to 3 (Severe). If the domain is reported by the caregiver as 'Not Affected,' that domain is scored as 0. The individual domain scores are calculated by multiplying the frequency times the severity for each domain. NPI Total Score is calculated by adding the individual domain scores together for all 12 domains, with a scores range from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating greater severity of neuropsychiatric disturbance. LS Mean was determined by MMRM methodology with factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease status at baseline, APOE4 status, AChEI use at baseline, pooled country, and covariates for baseline NPI score, age at baseline, and baseline NPI score-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)Baseline, Week 104
The MMSE is an instrument used to assess a participant's global cognitive function. The MMSE assesses orientation to time and place, immediate and delayed recall of words, attention and calculation, language (naming, comprehension and repetition), and spatial ability (copying a figure). The range for MMSE total Score is 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better cognitive performance. LS mean was determined by MMRM methodology with factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, disease status at baseline, APOE4 status, AChEI use at baseline, pooled country, and covariates for baseline MMSE total score, age at baseline, and baseline MMSE total score-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryPharmacodynamics (PD): Percent Change From Baseline in Concentration of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Biomarker Amyloid Beta (Aβ)1-42Baseline, Week 97
Concentration of the peptide Aβ 1-42 in plasma measured by validated immunoassay. LS Mean was determined by Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with last observation carried forward (LOCF), terms for treatment, baseline biomarker and age at baseline.
SecondaryPD: Percent Change From Baseline in Concentration of CSF Biomarker Aβ1-40Baseline, Week 97
Concentration of the peptide Aβ 1-40 in plasma measured by immunoassay. LS Mean was determined by ANCOVA with LOCF (last observation carried forward), terms for treatment, baseline biomarker and age at baseline.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline on the 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13)Baseline, Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for ADAS-Cog13 measure.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer´s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory Instrumental Items (ADCS-iADL)Baseline, Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for ADCS-iADL measure.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreBaseline, Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for FAQ score.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for iADRS.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) ScoreBaseline, Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for CDR-SB.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to Progression as Measured by Loss of Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score StageBaseline through Loss of 1 Global Stage or Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for CDR Global Score.DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) ScoreBaseline, Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for NPI.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)Baseline, Week 104All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for MMSE.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPharmacodynamics (PD): Percent Change From Baseline in Concentration of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Biomarker Amyloid Beta (Aβ)1-42Baseline, Week 97All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for Aβ1-42.Percent change in Aβ1-42LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPD: Percent Change From Baseline in Concentration of CSF Biomarker Aβ1-40Baseline, Week 97All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and have baseline and at least one post-baseline data for Aβ1-40.Percent change in Aβ1-40LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group50

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline on the 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13)Placebo10.31Standard Error 0.55Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13)Lanabecestat 20 mg9.38Standard Error 0.56Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13)Lanabecestat 50 mg10.72Standard Error 0.58Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer´s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory Instrumental Items (ADCS-iADL)Placebo-8.87Standard Error 0.60Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer´s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory Instrumental Items (ADCS-iADL)Lanabecestat 20 mg-8.84Standard Error 0.61Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer´s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory Instrumental Items (ADCS-iADL)Lanabecestat 50 mg-8.79Standard Error 0.63Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScorePlacebo6.09Standard Error 0.38Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreLanabecestat 20 mg5.96Standard Error 0.39Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreLanabecestat 50 mg6.71Standard Error 0.40Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) ScorePlacebo-19.56Standard Error 0.99Units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo740
Overall StudySTARTEDLanabecestat 20 Milligrams (mg)739
Overall StudySTARTEDLanabecestat 50 mg739
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPlacebo738
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugLanabecestat 20 Milligrams (mg)736
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugLanabecestat 50 mg735
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo187
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLanabecestat 20 Milligrams (mg)184
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLanabecestat 50 mg168
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo553

Adverse events882

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3973844
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLanabecestat 20 mg6273681
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLanabecestat 50 mg5473562
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3273838
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLanabecestat 20 mg3373639
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLanabecestat 50 mg4173550
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo6073869
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsLanabecestat 20 mg7873694
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsLanabecestat 50 mg7673589
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo4673857

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo2738
Total, all-cause mortalityLanabecestat 20 mg4736
Total, all-cause mortalityLanabecestat 50 mg4735
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo340738
Total, other adverse eventsLanabecestat 20 mg357736
Total, other adverse eventsLanabecestat 50 mg361735
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo108738
Total, serious adverse eventsLanabecestat 20 mg117736
Total, serious adverse eventsLanabecestat 50 mg147735

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27767991DERIVEDPubMed
31764959DERIVEDPubMed
33049114DERIVEDPubMed
40603145DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Delayed Recall ModulePrimary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02245737

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02245737/results?page=2