ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02252172

Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma

NCT02252172, Phase 3, Completed, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2020-01-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma. Trials, record NCT02252172. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02252172

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma
NCT number
NCT02252172
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
737 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Daratumumab IV, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Daratumumab SC
First posted
2014-09-30
Last updated
2025-10-20
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-002273-11
Results first posted
2020-01-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)
From randomization (Day -3) to disease progression, death, subsequent anti-myeloma therapy, withdrawal of consent to study participation or clinical cut-off (CCO) whichever occurs first (up to 3.5 years)
PFS was defined as time from date of randomization to either progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever occurred first based on computerized algorithm as per IMWG criteria. PD was defined as an increase of 25 percent (%) from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M-component (absolute increase must be greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 0.5 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\] and \>=200 milligram \[mg\]/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase must be greater than \[\>\]10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that could be attributed solely to Plasma cell (PC) proliferative disorder.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or BetterFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
Percentage of participants with a CR or better (CR or stringent complete response \[sCR\]) based on computerized algorithm as per IMWG criteria was reported. CR was defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and less than (\<) 5 percent (%) PCs in bone marrow. In participants with only measurable disease by serum FLC levels a normal serum FLC ratio was required. sCR was defined as in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence, 2-4 color flow cytometry (FC).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or BetterFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
VGPR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or better (VGPR, CR or sCR) according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment. VGPR: Serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or \>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level less than (\<) 100 milligram (mg) per 24 hour; CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasms cells (PCs) in bone marrow; sCR: CR in addition to having a normal FLC ratio and an absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by IHC, immunofluorescence, 2-4 color FC.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
MRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants who had negative MRD at any time point after the date of randomization and prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy. MRD was assessed in participants who achieved CR or better.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal PCs by IHC, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color FC. CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine; Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas; \<5% PCs in bone marrow.
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
ORR was the percentage of participants who achieved partial response (PR) or better (PR, VGPR, CR or sCR) based on computerized algorithm as per IMWG criteria. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours. If serum and urine M-protein were not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels was required in place of the M-protein criteria. If present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. VGPR: serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours. CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% PCs in bone marrow; sCR: CR in addition to having a normal FLC ratio and an absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by IHC, immunofluorescence, 2-4 color FC.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.7 yearsOS was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the death. Median OS was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryTime to Disease Progression (TTP)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of first documented evidence of PD or death due to PD, whichever occurred first. PD per IMWG criteria- Increase of 25 % from lowest response value in one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase \>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase \>=200 mg/24 hours); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase \>10 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]); Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder.
SecondaryTime to ResponseFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
Time to first response, time to VGPR or better, time to CR or better and time to best response was reported for this endpoint. Time to response: time from date of randomization to first efficacy evaluation that met criteria for PR/better as their best response (PR, CR, or better) based on IMWG criteria. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours. If serum and urine M-protein were not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels was required in place of M-protein criteria. Based on computerized algorithm, according to IMWG response criteria, VGPR or better: proportion of participants with a response of VGPR or better (i.e., VGPR, CR or sCR), CR or better: proportion of participants with a response of CR or better (i.e., CR or sCR).
SecondaryDuration of Response (DoR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
DoR was defined for participants with confirmed response (PR or better) as time between first documentation of response and disease progression per IMWG response criteria, or death due to PD, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria- Increase of 25 % from lowest response value in one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase \>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase \>=200 mg/24 hours); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase \>10 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]); Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)
From randomization (Day -3) to disease progression, death, subsequent anti-myeloma therapy, withdrawal of consent to study participation or clinical cut-off (CCO) whichever occurs first (up to 3.5 years)
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or BetterFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 yearsITT population included all randomized participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or BetterFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 yearsITT population included all randomized participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 yearsITT population included all randomized participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 yearsIntent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate (ORR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 yearsITT population included all randomized participants.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.7 yearsITT population included all randomized participants.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Disease Progression (TTP)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 yearsITT population included all randomized participants.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to ResponseFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
Response evaluable population included all participants with confirmed diagnosis of multiple myeloma and measurable disease at baseline or screening visit and received at least one administration of study treatment and had adequate postbaseline disease assessments. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DoR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 6.6 years
Response evaluable population included all participants with confirmed diagnosis of multiple myeloma and measurable disease at baseline or screening visit and received at least one administration of study treatment and had adequate postbaseline disease assessments. Here, 'N' (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
MonthsMEDIAN

Results by group112

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)31.8795% Confidence Interval 28.94 to NAMonths
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)NA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMonths
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or BetterLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)30.195% Confidence Interval 25.4 to 35.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or BetterDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)51.195% Confidence Interval 45.9 to 56.3Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or BetterLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)56.995% Confidence Interval 51.7 to 62.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or BetterDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)81.595% Confidence Interval 77.2 to 85.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)11.195% Confidence Interval 8.1 to 14.8Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)32.195% Confidence Interval 27.3 to 37.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)15.795% Confidence Interval 12.2 to 19.8Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)35.695% Confidence Interval 30.7 to 40.7Percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)369
Overall StudySTARTEDDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)368
Overall StudyTreatedLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)365
Overall StudyTreatedDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)364
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)369
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)368

Adverse events1,208

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)148365
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)154364
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)42365
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)73364
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)48365
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)72364
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)167365
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)224364
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)76365
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)82364

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)259369
Total, all-cause mortalityDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)287368
Total, other adverse eventsLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)358365
Total, other adverse eventsDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)362364
Total, serious adverse eventsLenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd)262365
Total, serious adverse eventsDaratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd)289364

Papers12

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31141632DERIVEDPubMed
33326255DERIVEDPubMed
34269818DERIVEDPubMed
34289038DERIVEDPubMed
34655533DERIVEDPubMed
36067063DERIVEDPubMed
37212642DERIVEDPubMed
39229471DERIVEDPubMed
39815052DERIVEDPubMed
39952901DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 12

See all 12 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd) vs Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (Rd) vs Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (DRd): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02252172

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02252172/results?page=2