ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02255435

A Study to Learn About the Effects and Safety of RTA 408 (Omaveloxolone) in People Aged 16 to 40 With Friedreich's Ataxia

NCT02255435, Phase 2, Completed, Biogen; results first posted 2022-11-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Learn About the Effects and Safety of RTA 408 (Omaveloxolone) in People Aged 16 to 40 With Friedreich's Ataxia. Trials, record NCT02255435. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02255435

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Learn About the Effects and Safety of RTA 408 (Omaveloxolone) in People Aged 16 to 40 With Friedreich's Ataxia
NCT number
NCT02255435
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
172 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Biogen
Conditions
Friedreich Ataxia
Interventions
Omaveloxolone Capsules, 2.5 mg, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 5 mg, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 10 mg, Placebo, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 20 mg, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 40 mg, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 80 mg, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 160 mg, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 300 mg, Omaveloxolone Capsules, 150 mg
First posted
2014-10-02
Last updated
2026-09-03
Results first posted
2022-11-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in Peak Work During Maximal Exercise Testing at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
Cycle ergometry using a recumbent stationary bicycle was used to conduct maximal exercise testing and workload was increased incrementally. Peak work is defined as the workload at which participants reach maximal volition (defined as an inability to continue to exercise due to exhaustion). A positive change from baseline suggests an improvement.
PrimaryPart 1: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From first dose of study drug up to end of Part 1 of the study (up to Week 16)
An adverse event (AE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including any clinically significant abnormal laboratory test result), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered to be study drug related. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of the Investigator, placed the participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. TEAEs were defined as any AEs, regardless of relationship to study drug, that had an onset or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
PrimaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) is a neurological-exam-based rating scale with five sections: Bulbar (section A), Upper Limb Coordination (section B), Lower Limb Coordination (section C), Peripheral Nervous System (section D), and Upright Stability (section E). mFARS is the sum of sections A (score 0 to 11), B (score 0 to 36), C (score 0 to 16), and E (score 0 to 36). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 99. A lower score indicates better neurological function.
PrimaryPart 2: Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEsFrom first dose of study drug up to end of Part 2 of the study (up to Week 52)
An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including any clinically significant abnormal laboratory test result), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered to be study drug related. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of the Investigator, placed the participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. TEAEs were defined as any AEs, regardless of relationship to study drug, that had an onset or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in the mFARS at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
The FARS is a neurological-exam-based rating scale with five sections: Bulbar (section A), Upper Limb Coordination (section B), Lower Limb Coordination (section C), Peripheral Nervous System (section D), and Upright Stability (section E). mFARS is the sum of sections A (score 0 to 11), B (score 0 to 36), C (score 0 to 16), and E (score 0 to 36). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 99. A lower score indicates better neurological function.
SecondaryPart 2: Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 48
The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that requires participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to their baseline state at the beginning of the trial. Participants self-rated their perceived change by completing the following statement: "Since I began trial treatment, my overall status is:" 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse and 7=Very much worse. Lower score indicates better improvement. The categories with at least one participant having a PGI-C score are reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)Week 48
The CGIC scale is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of an intervention. The CGIC was assessed by completing the following statement "Compared to the participant's condition at the start of the trial, this participant's overall status is", where 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse. Lower score indicates better improvement. The categories with at least one participant having a CGIC score are reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Performance on a 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
The 9-HPT is a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity (arm and hand) function. Both the dominant and nondominant hands were tested twice (2 consecutive trials of the dominant hand, followed immediately by 2 consecutive trials of the nondominant hand). The participant picks up pegs 1 at a time (9 in total), using 1 hand only, and places them into holes on the board as quickly as possible, in any order until all holes are filled. Then, without pausing, the participant removes the pegs 1 at a time and returns them as quickly as possible. The times recorded for the two trials for each hand are averaged, and the reciprocal average value for each hand was used in analyses. Longer test times reflect more impairment on the participant's upper extremity function, thus a negative change from baseline suggests an improvement.
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline in Performance on a 25-Foot Timed Walk Test (T25-FWT) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
The T25-FWT is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on time (in seconds) to complete a 25-foot walk. Participants were instructed to attempt two T25-FWT trials at each visit. Both walk times were averaged, and the reciprocal average value was used in analyses. Longer test times reflect more impairment on the participant's ability to walk, thus a negative change from baseline suggests an improvement.
SecondaryPart 2: Total Number of FallsUp to Week 48A fall was defined as "the participant unintentionally coming to rest on the ground or at a lower level." The total number of falls before and after study drug administration has been reported.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Baseline through 12 weeks after participant receives the first dose in Part 1.All randomized patients in Part 1, whether or not they received study drugW/kgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48 in Part 248 weeks after participant receives the first dose in Part 2Full analysis set (all patients in Part 2 randomized without pes cavus who have at least one post-baseline measurement)score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 112 weeks after participant receives the first dose in Part 1All randomized patients in Part 1, whether or not they received study drugscore on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mg0.1495% Confidence Interval 0.02 to 0.26W/kg
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mg0.0795% Confidence Interval -0.05 to 0.18W/kg
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mg-0.0995% Confidence Interval -0.20 to 0.03W/kg
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mg0.0695% Confidence Interval -0.06 to 0.18W/kg
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mg095% Confidence Interval -0.11 to 0.12W/kg
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mg0.0295% Confidence Interval -0.06 to 0.10W/kg
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mg0.0795% Confidence Interval -0.02 to 0.17W/kg
Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1Part 1 Placebo Capsules0.0495% Confidence Interval -0.03 to 0.11W/kg
Change in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48 in Part 2Part 2 Placebo Capsules0.85Standard Error 0.640score on a scale
Change in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48 in Part 2Part 2 Omaveloxolone Capsules 150 mg-1.55Standard Error 0.689score on a scale

Participant flow40

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mg6
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mg6
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mg6
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mg6
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mg6
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mg12
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mg10
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 1 Placebo Capsules17
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 2 Placebo Capsules52
Overall StudySTARTEDPart 2 Omaveloxolone Capsules 150 mg51

Adverse events1,450

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mg060
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mg060
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mg060
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mg060
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mg060
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mg0120
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mg0100
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 1 Placebo Capsules1171
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 2 Placebo Capsules0520
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPart 2 Omaveloxolone Capsules 150 mg1511

Adverse event totals30

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mg06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mg06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mg06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mg06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mg06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mg012
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mg010
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Placebo Capsules017
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 2 Placebo Capsules052
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 2 Omaveloxolone Capsules 150 mg051

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30656180DERIVEDPubMed
33068037DERIVEDPubMed
40614535DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02255435

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02255435/flow?page=2