ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02255552

Study of Eteplirsen in DMD Patients

NCT02255552, Phase 3, Completed, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.; results first posted 2020-07-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Eteplirsen in DMD Patients. Trials, record NCT02255552. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02255552

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Eteplirsen in DMD Patients
NCT number
NCT02255552
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
109 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Conditions
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
Interventions
eteplirsen
First posted
2014-10-02
Last updated
2021-01-25
Results first posted
2020-07-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at Week 96Baseline, Week 96
6MWT was performed by standardized procedures for all participants. Participants were asked to walk a set course of 25 meters for 6 minutes (timed), and the distance walked (in meters) was recorded. Change from baseline in 6MWT distance at Week 96 was reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Dystrophin Protein Levels Determined by Western Blot at Week 96Baseline, Week 96
Change from baseline in dystrophin protein levels (in muscle biopsy samples) were determined by Western blot. For each time point, 2 blocks of tissues were analyzed by Western blot, each with 2 replicates of gels to determine the dystrophin level as compared to a healthy individual (Percent Normal). The block average value from 2 replicate gels was computed. The overall average was calculated as the mean of the block average values. The overall average values were used for all analyses. In case only 1 gel was available for a block, then that value was used as the block average value.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Having Ability to Rise Independently From the Floor Determined Based on North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) at Week 96Week 96
NSAA is a clinician-administered scale that rates participant performance on 17-items and included assessments of abilities such as 10-meter walk/run, rising from a sit to stand, standing on 1 leg, climbing a box step, descending a box step, rising from lying to sitting, rising from the floor, lifting the head, standing on heels, and jumping. For all activities, participants were graded as follows: 0 = unable to achieve goal independently; 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another and 2 = normal, no obvious modification of activity. Number of participants having ability to rise independently from the floor indicated by a NSAA Rise from floor sub score greater than 0 (unable to achieve goal independently) was reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Lost Ambulation (LOA) by Week 96Up to Week 96
Number of participants who lost ambulation (LOA) by Week 96 was reported. Participant were considered non-ambulatory if each of the 3 conditions below were met: NSAA walk subscore was "0" (unable to achieve goal independently) on 2 consecutive days within a visit or NSAA was not done due to reason related to non-ambulation; 6MWT was not done with any reason related to permanent non-ambulation; and no later data showing this participant was still ambulatory. This was not required if non ambulatory status occurred at the time of early withdrawal or at the end of Week 96 assessment. NSAA is a 17-item scale to assess the participant's abilities; total score range from 0 (if all the activities are failed) to 34 (if all the activities are achieved) with higher scores indicating better performance on the assessment/ fully-independent function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity Percent (FVC%) Predicted at Weeks 96Baseline, Week 96
FVC is the total amount of air exhaled during the forced expiratory volume test that is measured during spirometry; and is the most important measurement of lung function. This test requires participant to breath into a tube connected to a machine that measures the amount of air that can be moved in and out of the lungs after taking an inhaled bronchodilator medicine which is used to dilate participant's bronchial (breathing) tubes. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value) / (predicted value) \* 100%.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Scores at Week 96Baseline, Week 96
NSAA is a clinician-administered scale that rates participant performance on 17-items and included assessments of abilities such as 10-meter walk/run, rising from a sit to stand, standing on 1 leg, climbing a box step, descending a box step, rising from lying to sitting, rising from the floor, lifting the head, standing on heels, and jumping. Participant were graded as follows: 0 = unable to achieve goal independently; 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another and 2 = normal, no obvious modification of activity. NSAA total score was derived by summing the scores for all the individual items and range from 0 (if all the activities are failed) to 34 (if all the activities are achieved) with higher scores indicating better performance on the assessment/ fully-independent function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Dystrophin Intensity Levels Determined by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Week 96Baseline, Week 96Change from baseline in dystrophin intensity levels (in muscle biopsy samples) was determined by Immunohistochemistry.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at Week 96Baseline, Week 96
Primary efficacy set: all participants in the efficacy set (all participants in eteplirsen-treated and untreated control groups who had at least 1 post-baseline functional assessment) who had a Baseline 6MWT distance of 300 to 450 meters, inclusive. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
metersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Dystrophin Protein Levels Determined by Western Blot at Week 96Baseline, Week 96
Analysis Set consisted of a subset of participants who received at least 1 dose of eteplirsen and had both baseline and 1 post-dose muscle biopsy samples evaluable for dystrophin expression at Week 96. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for the Untreated Control group.
Percent Normal Dystrophin Protein LevelMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Having Ability to Rise Independently From the Floor Determined Based on North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) at Week 96Week 96
Primary efficacy set: all participants in the efficacy set (all participants in eteplirsen-treated and untreated control groups who had at least 1 post-baseline functional assessment) who had a Baseline 6MWT distance of 300 to 450 meters, inclusive. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Lost Ambulation (LOA) by Week 96Up to Week 96
Primary efficacy set consisted of all participants in the efficacy set (all participants in eteplirsen-treated and untreated control groups who had at least 1 post-baseline functional assessment) who had a Baseline 6MWT distance of 300 to 450 meters, inclusive.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity Percent (FVC%) Predicted at Weeks 96Baseline, Week 96
Primary efficacy set: all participants in the efficacy set (all participants in eteplirsen-treated and untreated control groups who had at least 1 post-baseline functional assessment) who had a Baseline 6MWT distance of 300 to 450 meters, inclusive. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of predicted FVCMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Scores at Week 96Baseline, Week 96
Primary efficacy: all participants in the efficacy set (all participants in eteplirsen-treated and untreated control groups who had at least 1 post-baseline functional assessment) who had a Baseline 6MWT distance of 300 to 450 meters, inclusive. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed=participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Unit on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Dystrophin Intensity Levels Determined by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Week 96Baseline, Week 96
Analysis Set consisted of a subset of participants who received at least 1 dose of eteplirsen and had both baseline and 1 post-dose muscle biopsy samples evaluable for dystrophin expression at Week 96. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for the Untreated Control group.
Percent dystrophin positive fibersMEAN

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at Week 96Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg-117.91Standard Deviation 128.488meters
Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at Week 96Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)-133.56Standard Deviation 129.333meters
Change From Baseline in Dystrophin Protein Levels Determined by Western Blot at Week 96Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg0.516Standard Deviation 0.7236Percent Normal Dystrophin Protein Level
Number of Participants Having Ability to Rise Independently From the Floor Determined Based on North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) at Week 96Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg33Participants
Number of Participants Having Ability to Rise Independently From the Floor Determined Based on North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) at Week 96Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)3Participants
Number of Participants Who Lost Ambulation (LOA) by Week 96Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg12Participants
Number of Participants Who Lost Ambulation (LOA) by Week 96Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)1Participants
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity Percent (FVC%) Predicted at Weeks 96Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg-3.413Standard Deviation 12.4011Percentage of predicted FVC
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity Percent (FVC%) Predicted at Weeks 96Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)-2.461Standard Deviation 9.6000Percentage of predicted FVC
Change From Baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Scores at Week 96Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg-7.23Standard Deviation 5.173Unit on scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEteplirsen 30 mg/kg79
Overall StudySTARTEDUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)30
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEteplirsen 30 mg/kg78
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEteplirsen 30 mg/kg1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)15

Adverse events158

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFlushingVascular disordersEteplirsen 30 mg/kg479
otherFlushingVascular disordersUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)030
otherSkin papillomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg579
otherSkin papillomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)130
otherSeasonal allergyImmune system disordersEteplirsen 30 mg/kg1479
otherSeasonal allergyImmune system disordersUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)030
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersEteplirsen 30 mg/kg2079
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)130
otherNon-cardiac chest painGeneral disordersEteplirsen 30 mg/kg979
otherNon-cardiac chest painGeneral disordersUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)030

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEteplirsen 30 mg/kg079
Total, all-cause mortalityUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)030
Total, other adverse eventsEteplirsen 30 mg/kg7879
Total, other adverse eventsUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)2430
Total, serious adverse eventsEteplirsen 30 mg/kg1179
Total, serious adverse eventsUntreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants)230

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31237898BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg vs Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants): Number of Participants Having Ability to Rise Independently From the Floor Determined Based on North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) at Week 96
Trial comparisons
Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg vs Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants): Number of Participants Who Lost Ambulation (LOA) by Week 96Trial comparisons
Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg vs Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Eteplirsen 30 mg/kg vs Untreated Control Group (Non-exon 51 Amenable Participants): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02255552

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02255552/events?page=2