ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02259088

A 12-month, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab vs Laser in Chinese Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Patients

NCT02259088, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2019-02-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A 12-month, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab vs Laser in Chinese Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Patients. Trials, record NCT02259088. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02259088

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A 12-month, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab vs Laser in Chinese Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Patients
NCT number
NCT02259088
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
384 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Diabetic Macular Edema, Visual Impairment
Interventions
Ranibizumab (RFB002), Laser, Sham injection, Sham laser
First posted
2014-10-08
Last updated
2019-02-01
Results first posted
2019-02-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Average Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters) to Month 1 Through 12Baseline, Monthly from Month 1 through Month 12
Visual acuity with eyeglasses was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A letter score was calculated based on the number of letters correctly identified at the specified distance. Twelve monthly BCVA values were averaged \[(Month1+Month2+...+Month12)/12\], and the baseline BCVA value was subtracted from the average. A positive change value indicates an improvement in visual acuity, while a negative change value indicates a worsening. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitBaseline, Monthly from Month 1 through Month 12
Visual acuity with eyeglasses was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A letter score was calculated based on the number of letters correctly identified at the specified distance. A positive change value indicates an improvement in visual acuity, while a negative change value indicates a worsening. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) at Each VisitBaseline, Monthly from Month 1 through Month 12
CSFT (the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 millimeter diameter around the foveal center) was assessed using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). A negative change value indicates an improvement in macular edema, while a positive change value indicates a worsening. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With BCVA Gain of ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters From Baseline at Month 12Baseline, Month 12
Visual acuity with eyeglasses was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A letter score was calculated based on the number of letters correctly identified at the specified distance. A positive change value indicates an improvement in visual acuity, while a negative change value indicates a worsening. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With BCVA Loss of < 10 and < 15 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Baseline, Month 12
Visual acuity with eyeglasses was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A letter score was calculated based on the number of letters correctly identified at the specified distance. A positive change value indicates an improvement in visual acuity, while a negative change value indicates a worsening. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With BCVA ≥ 73 Letters at Month 12Month 12
Visual acuity with eyeglasses was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A letter score was calculated based on the number of letters correctly identified at the specified distance. A positive change value indicates an improvement in visual acuity, while a negative change value indicates a worsening. BCVA ≥ 73 letters is approximately equivalent to 20/40 on a Snellen chart. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
SecondaryMean Average Change in BCVA From Month 4 to Month 12 Compared to Month 3Monthly from Month 3 through Month 12
Visual acuity with eyeglasses was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A letter score was calculated based on the number of letters correctly identified at the specified distance. Nine monthly BCVA values were averaged \[(Month4+Month5+...+Month12)/9\],and the Month 3 BCVA value was subtracted from the average. A positive change value indicates an improvement in visual acuity, while a negative change value indicates a worsening. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Visual Functioning at Month 6 and Month 12, Composite ScoreBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Visual functioning was assessed by the patient using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst possible score and 100 = best. A positive change value indicates a perceived improvement in visual functioning, while a negative change value indicates a worsening.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported General Health at Month 6 and Month 12Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
General health was assessed by the patient using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst possible score and 100 = best. A positive change value indicates a perceived improvement in general health, while a negative change value indicates a worsening.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported General Vision at Month 6 and Month 12Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
General vision was assessed by the patient using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst possible score and 100 = best. A positive change value indicates a perceived improvement in general vision, while a negative change value indicates a worsening.

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Average Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters) to Month 1 Through 12Baseline, Monthly from Month 1 through Month 12Full Analysis Set (FAS). Missing values imputed by the mean value last observation carried forward (MV-LOCF).lettersMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitBaseline, Monthly from Month 1 through Month 12
Full Analysis Set (FAS) with missing values imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF). The number analyzed is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit.
lettersMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) at Each VisitBaseline, Monthly from Month 1 through Month 12
Full Analysis Set (FAS) with missing values imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF). The number analyzed is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit.
micrometersMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With BCVA Gain of ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters From Baseline at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Full Analysis Set (FAS) with missing values imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With BCVA Loss of < 10 and < 15 Letters From Baseline to Month 12Baseline, Month 12Full Analysis Set (FAS) with missing values imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With BCVA ≥ 73 Letters at Month 12Month 12Full Analysis Set (FAS) with missing values imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Average Change in BCVA From Month 4 to Month 12 Compared to Month 3Monthly from Month 3 through Month 12Full Analysis Set (FAS) with missing values imputed by the last observation carried forward (LOCF).lettersMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Visual Functioning at Month 6 and Month 12, Composite ScoreBaseline, Month 6, Month 12Full Analysis Set, observed data (no missing data imputations). The number analyzed is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported General Health at Month 6 and Month 12Baseline, Month 6, Month 12Full Analysis Set, observed data (no missing data imputations). The number analyzed is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported General Vision at Month 6 and Month 12Baseline, Month 6, Month 12Full Analysis Set, observed data (no missing data imputations). The number analyzed is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group117

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Average Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters) to Month 1 Through 12Ranibizumab (RFB002)6.8Standard Deviation 6.58letters
Mean Average Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters) to Month 1 Through 12Laser1.1Standard Deviation 7.73letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitRanibizumab (RFB002)Change from Baseline at Month 14.0Standard Deviation 5.59letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitLaserChange from Baseline at Month 1-0.9Standard Deviation 5.50letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitRanibizumab (RFB002)Change from Baseline at Month 25.8Standard Deviation 6.44letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitLaserChange from Baseline at Month 20.0Standard Deviation 8.08letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitRanibizumab (RFB002)Change from Baseline at Month 36.9Standard Deviation 6.91letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitLaserChange from Baseline at Month 31.1Standard Deviation 9.18letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitRanibizumab (RFB002)Change from Baseline at Month 46.6Standard Deviation 7.23letters
Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (Letters) at Each VisitLaserChange from Baseline at Month 40.0Standard Deviation 11.64letters

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRanibizumab (RFB002)307
Overall StudySTARTEDLaser77
Overall StudyFull Analysis SetRanibizumab (RFB002)307
Overall StudyFull Analysis SetLaser77
Overall StudyTreated (Safety Analysis Set)Ranibizumab (RFB002)307
Overall StudyTreated (Safety Analysis Set)Laser75
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRanibizumab (RFB002)279
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLaser63
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRanibizumab (RFB002)28
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLaser14

Adverse events170

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRanibizumab (RFB002)10307
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLaser075
otherConjunctival haemorrhage (Study eye)Eye disordersRanibizumab (RFB002)11307
otherConjunctival haemorrhage (Study eye)Eye disordersLaser175
otherDry eye (Fellow eye)Eye disordersRanibizumab (RFB002)10307
otherDry eye (Fellow eye)Eye disordersLaser175
otherDry eye (Study eye)Eye disordersRanibizumab (RFB002)11307
otherDry eye (Study eye)Eye disordersLaser175
otherVitreous haemorrhage (Fellow eye)Eye disordersRanibizumab (RFB002)11307
otherVitreous haemorrhage (Fellow eye)Eye disordersLaser375

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRanibizumab (RFB002)
Total, all-cause mortalityLaser
Total, other adverse eventsRanibizumab (RFB002)116307
Total, other adverse eventsLaser3075
Total, serious adverse eventsRanibizumab (RFB002)57307
Total, serious adverse eventsLaser1575

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Ranibizumab (RFB002) vs Laser: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02259088

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02259088/registered?page=2