ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02280096

Efficacy and Safety of 4-aminopyridine on Cognitive Performance and Motor Function of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

NCT02280096, Phase 2, Completed, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico; results first posted 2019-09-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of 4-aminopyridine on Cognitive Performance and Motor Function of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Trials, record NCT02280096. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02280096

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of 4-aminopyridine on Cognitive Performance and Motor Function of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT number
NCT02280096
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
24 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
Conditions
Multiple Sclerosis
Interventions
4-aminopyridine, Placebo
First posted
2014-10-31
Last updated
2019-09-12
Results first posted
2019-09-12
Limitations and caveats
As the sample size is very small, it is recommended to increase the number of patients. The heterogeneity in cognitive processes would imply a greater restriction criteria in the selection of patients to avoid the ceiling effect.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryThe Brief Repeatable Battery of Rao10-15 minutes
Neuropsychological tests to assess: verbal fluency. Participants have to say as many words as possible from a category in a given time 60 Sec (F, A, S) Max score 72 and min score 19 words. Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance.
PrimaryIntegrated Program of Neuropsychological Exploration Test Barcelona7-10 min
Integrated Program of Neuropsychological Exploration Test Barcelona: Digit Span Forward (DSF), (attention spam and improved scoring metrics significantly enhance the precision of DSF assessments of short-term verbal memory). Digit sequences are presented beginning with a length of two digits and two trials are presented at each increasing list length. Max score 8 and min score 0 digits. Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance.
PrimaryRey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)10-15 minutes
The purpose of this test is to assess visual-spatial constructional ability and visual memory. The time required to copy the drawing is recorded. Less time indicates a better performance and more time indicates a worse outcome (min score 60 and max score 300 seconds).
PrimaryFive Digit Test (FDT). Processing Speed8-10 min
Processing speed information (which includes reading, count, and alternation speed). Cards with a different number of stimuli are shown to the patient, who has to read, count, and respond to a change of instructions (alternation). Reading speed (min 12, max 31+ seconds), counting speed (min 14, max 28+ seconds), and alternation speed (min 26, max 56+ seconds) are recorded. Less speed corresponds to a better outcome.
PrimaryWisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)10-15 minutes
Is used primarily to assess perseveration and abstract thinking, allows the clinician to assess the following 'frontal' lobe functions: strategic planning, organised searching, utilising environmental feedback to shift cognitive sets, directing behaviour toward achieving a goal. WCST measures abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 128 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only "right" or "wrong" to each placement. The examiner may change matching rules during the test. Perseveration errors occur when subject repeats the same error no matter how many times they are told the placement is wrong. Higher scores indicate a worse cognitive performance (min=0-3, max=58-126)
PrimaryColor Trails Test (CTT)5-8 minutes
Measure sustained attention. The CTT uses numbered coloured circles and universal sign language symbols. The circles are printed with vivid pink or yellow backgrounds that are perceptible to colourblind individuals. For the Colour Trails 1 trial, the respondent uses a pencil to rapidly connect circles numbered 1 through 25 in sequence. Less time indicates better performance (min=10, max= 240).
PrimaryTower Of London (TOL). Total Moves and Total Correct Moves25-30 minutes
Measures higher order problem-solving ability. The information it provides is not only useful when assessing frontal lobe damage, but also when evaluating attention disorders and executive functioning difficulties. The administrator arranges red, green, and blue beads on a peg board to match the configuration in the diagram. The patient is asked to replicate the configuration on a second peg board. Scores are calculated for Total Correct Moves and Total Moves. Total moves: higher scores indicate a worse cognitive performance (min= 0, max=58+); Total correct higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance (min=0, max=10).
PrimaryTower Of London (TOL). Execution Time and Problem-solving Time25-30 minutes
Measures higher-order problem-solving ability. The information it provides is not only useful when assessing frontal lobe damage, but also when evaluating attention disorders and executive functioning difficulties. The administrator arranges red, green, and blue beads on a peg board to match the configuration in the diagram. The patient is asked to replicate the configuration on a second peg board. Scores are calculated for Total Execution Time (since the patient performs the first move until he ends the test), Total Problem-Solving Time (the sum of planning and execution times). Total execution time higher scores indicate a worse outcome (min= 0-78, max=564+ seconds), Total problem-solving time higher scores indicate a worse outcome (min= 0-56, max=500+ seconds).
SecondaryImproved Physical Capacity15-20 minutes
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS. The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability. Scoring is based on an examination by a neurologist. The first levels 1.0 to 4.5 refers to people with a high degree of ambulatory ability and the subsequent levels 5.0 to 9.5 refers to the loss of ambulatory ability. It also provides eight subscale measurements called Functional System (FS) scores. The levels of function within each category refer to the eight FS affected by MS: The FS are scored on a scale of 0 (low level of problems) to 5 (high level of problems) to best reflect the level of disability observed clinically.
SecondaryFatigue10 minutes
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is one of the most frequently used inventories for measuring fatigue in people with chronic illnesses. The FSS questionnaire is comprised of nine statements inquiring about the examinee's sleep habits over the preceding week. Ratings are on a 7-point Likert scale, where higher scores indicate how strongly the patient agrees with the nine statements.Scale. Scoring using a bimodal response system or a Likert score with weights assigned to each response choice. Likert or bimodal rating scales with 4 response options. For the Likert Scale: better than usual= 0, no more than usual= 1, worse than usual= 2, much worse than usual= 3. For the bimodal scale: better than usual= 0, no more than usual= 0, worse than usual= 1, much worse than usual= 1. Sum all items for a total score. Score range. Range is 0 -11 for bimodal response format. Interpretation of scores. Higher score indicates more fatigue. Self report scale

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Brief Repeatable Battery of Rao10-15 minutesWord List Generation (3 trials/60 sec)Correct wordsMEAN
PRIMARYIntegrated Program of Neuropsychological Exploration Test Barcelona7-10 minAttention spam.correct numbers recalledMEAN
PRIMARYRey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)10-15 minutesunits on a scale (seconds)MEAN
PRIMARYFive Digit Test (FDT). Processing Speed8-10 minsecondsMEAN
PRIMARYWisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)10-15 minutesscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYColor Trails Test (CTT)5-8 minutesColor Trails Test 1. Execution timeunits on a scale (seconds)MEAN
PRIMARYTower Of London (TOL). Total Moves and Total Correct Moves25-30 minutesscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYTower Of London (TOL). Execution Time and Problem-solving Time25-30 minutessecondsMEAN
SECONDARYImproved Physical Capacity15-20 minutesscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYFatigue10 minutesscore on a scaleMEAN

Results by group34

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Brief Repeatable Battery of Rao4-aminopyridine42.09Standard Deviation 14.5Correct words
The Brief Repeatable Battery of RaoPlacebo35.5Standard Deviation 6.6Correct words
Integrated Program of Neuropsychological Exploration Test Barcelona4-aminopyridine6.1Standard Deviation 1.5correct numbers recalled
Integrated Program of Neuropsychological Exploration Test BarcelonaPlacebo5Standard Deviation 0.8correct numbers recalled
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)4-aminopyridine208.6Standard Deviation 121.2units on a scale (seconds)
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF)Placebo231.2Standard Deviation 114.8units on a scale (seconds)
Five Digit Test (FDT). Processing Speed4-aminopirydineReading speed28Standard Deviation 9seconds
Five Digit Test (FDT). Processing SpeedPlaceboReading speed29.6Standard Deviation 4.2seconds
Five Digit Test (FDT). Processing Speed4-aminopirydineCount speed30.5Standard Deviation 9.2seconds
Five Digit Test (FDT). Processing SpeedPlaceboCount speed34.2Standard Deviation 12seconds

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED4-aminopyridine Treatment13
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo11
Overall StudyCOMPLETED4-aminopyridine Treatment11
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED4-aminopyridine Treatment2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1

Adverse events30

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInsominiaPsychiatric disorders4-aminopyridine711
otherInsominiaPsychiatric disordersPlacebo810
otherHeadacheNervous system disorders4-aminopyridine611
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo710
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disorders4-aminopyridine611
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo310
otherVertigoNervous system disorders4-aminopyridine611
otherVertigoNervous system disordersPlacebo310
otherTremor in handsNervous system disorders4-aminopyridine411
otherTremor in handsNervous system disordersPlacebo110

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality4-aminopyridine011
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo010
Total, other adverse events4-aminopyridine711
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo810
Total, serious adverse events4-aminopyridine011
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo010

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
7936300BACKGROUNDPubMed
11795455BACKGROUNDPubMed
15327047BACKGROUNDPubMed
16643949BACKGROUNDPubMed
24290498BACKGROUNDPubMed
30593980DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
4-aminopyridine vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
4-aminopyridine vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests5

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Card Sorting Test (Berg)Primary outcomeConductCognition
Complex Figure Copy and RecallPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Tower PlanningPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencyPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02280096

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02280096/results?page=2