ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02294058

Study of Ozanimod (RPC1063) in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

NCT02294058, Phase 3, Completed, Celgene; results first posted 2020-11-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Ozanimod (RPC1063) in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Trials, record NCT02294058. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02294058

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Ozanimod (RPC1063) in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
NCT number
NCT02294058
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,346 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Conditions
Multiple Sclerosis
Interventions
Ozanimod, Interferon beta-1a, Placebo to ozanimod, Placebo to interferon beta-1a
First posted
2014-11-19
Last updated
2020-11-25
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-002320-27
Results first posted
2020-11-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAdjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the Treatment Period12 months
The relapse rate was based on confirmed relapses. A relapse was defined as new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS and preceded by a relatively stable or improving neurological state for at least 30 days. Symptoms must have persisted for \> 24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors. Relapses were confirmed when accompanied by objective neurological worsening based on examination by the blinded evaluator, consistent with an increase of ≥ 0.5 on the overall EDSS score relative to the most recent EDSS assessment, or 2 points on one of the functional system scale scores, or 1 point on ≥ two functional system scale scores. Relapse rate was calculated as the total number of relapses divided by the total number of days in the study \* 365.25. ARR was adjusted for region (Eastern Europe vs rest of world), Baseline age, and Baseline number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions; the natural log transformation of time on study was included as an offset term.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 12 Months12 month treatment period; MRI scans were assessed at Month 6 and Month 12The number of new or enlarging hyperintense T2-weighted brain MRI lesions per scan was based on the cumulative number of new or enlarging T2 lesions since Baseline over treatment period.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Brain MRI Lesions at Month 12Month 12
SecondaryTime to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 3 MonthsFrom first dose to the end of the 12-month treatment period
EDSS is used to quantify disability and disability progression over time in MS. Based on a neurological examination, 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel \& bladder, cerebral, and other functions) are scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 or 6 (more severe disability). Ambulation is assessed based on distance the patient is able to walk, whether assistance is required or restrictions are present. The EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5 unit increments. Disability progression is defined by a sustained worsening in EDSS score of 1.0 point or more confirmed after 3 months. Time to onset of disability progression was calculated from the date of first dose to the date of the first visit at which the 1.0 point increase in EDSS was met using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants without a sustained disease progression event were censored on the date of their last assessment or last dose of study drug, whichever was later.
SecondaryTime to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 6 MonthsFrom first dose to the end of the 12-month treatment period
EDSS is used to quantify disability and disability progression over time in MS. Based on a neurological examination, 8 functional systems (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel \& bladder, cerebral, and other functions) are scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 or 6 (more severe disability). Ambulation is assessed based on distance the patient is able to walk, whether assistance is required or restrictions are present. The EDSS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5 unit increments. Disability progression is defined by a sustained worsening in EDSS score of 1.0 point or more confirmed after 6 months. Time to onset of disability progression was calculated from the date of first dose to the date of the first visit at which the 1.0 point increase in EDSS was met using Kaplan-Meier methods. Participants without a sustained disease progression event were censored on the date of their last assessment or last dose of study drug, whichever was later.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Gadolinium Enhancing Lesion-Free at Month 12Month 12MRI scans were analyzed by blinded centralized reading facility.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were T2 Lesion-Free at Month 12Month 12MRI scans were analyzed by blinded centralized reading facility.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume at Month 12Baseline to Month 12Brain volume (a measure of brain atrophy) was analyzed by MRI.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score Including the Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) TestBaseline to Month 12
The MSFC-LCLA is a battery including the following 4 individual scales: * Timed 25-Foot Walk is an ambulation measure of walking 25 feet with time taken recorded in seconds * 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function * Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a measure of executive cognitive function that assesses processing speed, flexibility, and calculation ability * Low-Contrast Letter Acuity Test (LCLA) used a standardized set of charts to assess low contrast visual acuity, charts are scored according to the number of letters that are identified correctly Z-scores were calculated for for each component and averaged to create an overall composite score, using the study population as the reference population. A z-score represents the number of standard deviations a patient's test result is higher (z \> 0) or lower (z \< 0) than the average test result (z = 0) of the reference population. A positive change indicates improvement.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Physical Health Composite Summary and Mental Health Composite Summary ScoresBaseline to Month 12
The MSQOL-54 is a multidimensional health-related QOL measure that combines both generic and MS-specific items into a single instrument. The instrument includes 12 subscales, two summary scores, and two single-item measures. The two summary scores - physical health and mental health - are derived from a weighted combination of scale scores. The physical health composite score includes Physical function, Health perceptions, Energy/fatigue, Role limitations - physical, Pain, Sexual function, Social function, and Health distress. The mental health composite score includes Health distress, Overall quality of life, Emotional well-being, Role limitations - emotional, and Cognitive function. Each composite summary score has a range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAdjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the Treatment Period12 monthsThe ITT population consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.relapses/yearLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 12 Months12 month treatment period; MRI scans were assessed at Month 6 and Month 12ITT population; participants with non-missing MRI results.T2 lesions/scanLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Brain MRI Lesions at Month 12Month 12ITT population; participants with non-missing MRI results.lesionsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 3 MonthsFrom first dose to the end of the 12-month treatment periodITT populationdaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 6 MonthsFrom first dose to the end of the 12-month treatment periodITT populationdaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Were Gadolinium Enhancing Lesion-Free at Month 12Month 12The ITT population; Participants who were missing the Month 12 MRI data were considered non-responders; ie, as not being lesion-free (non-responder imputation).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Were T2 Lesion-Free at Month 12Month 12The ITT population; participants who were missing the Month 12 MRI data were considered non-responders, ie, as not being lesion-free.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Normalized Brain Volume at Month 12Baseline to Month 12The ITT population with available MRI data at Baseline and Month 12percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score Including the Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) TestBaseline to Month 12The ITT population with available Baseline and Month 12 MSFC z-scores.z-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54 Physical Health Composite Summary and Mental Health Composite Summary ScoresBaseline to Month 12ITT population with available Baseline data; missing post-baseline data were imputed using a mixed-effects regression model (random slope and intercept).units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group69

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the Treatment PeriodInterferon Beta-1a0.35095% Confidence Interval 0.279 to 0.440relapses/year
Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the Treatment PeriodOzanimod 0.5 mg0.24195% Confidence Interval 0.188 to 0.308relapses/year
Adjusted Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the Treatment PeriodOzanimod 1 mg0.18195% Confidence Interval 0.140 to 0.236relapses/year
Adjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 12 MonthsInterferon Beta-1a2.83695% Confidence Interval 2.331 to 3.451T2 lesions/scan
Adjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 12 MonthsOzanimod 0.5 mg2.13995% Confidence Interval 1.777 to 2.575T2 lesions/scan
Adjusted Mean Number of New or Enlarging Hyperintense T2-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesions Per Scan Over 12 MonthsOzanimod 1 mg1.46595% Confidence Interval 1.203 to 1.784T2 lesions/scan
Adjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Brain MRI Lesions at Month 12Interferon Beta-1a0.43395% Confidence Interval 0.295 to 0.635lesions
Adjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Brain MRI Lesions at Month 12Ozanimod 0.5 mg0.28795% Confidence Interval 0.197 to 0.418lesions
Adjusted Mean Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (GdE) Brain MRI Lesions at Month 12Ozanimod 1 mg0.16095% Confidence Interval 0.106 to 0.242lesions
Time to Onset of Disability Progression Confirmed After 3 MonthsInterferon Beta-1aNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAdays

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDInterferon Beta-1a448
Overall StudySTARTEDOzanimod 0.5 mg451
Overall StudySTARTEDOzanimod 1 mg447
Overall StudySafety PopulationInterferon Beta-1a445
Overall StudySafety PopulationOzanimod 0.5 mg453
Overall StudySafety PopulationOzanimod 1 mg448
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDInterferon Beta-1a412
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOzanimod 0.5 mg425
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOzanimod 1 mg418
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDInterferon Beta-1a36

Adverse events129

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInfluenza Like IllnessGeneral disordersInterferon Beta-1a227445
otherInfluenza Like IllnessGeneral disordersOzanimod 0.5 mg18453
otherInfluenza Like IllnessGeneral disordersOzanimod 1 mg17448
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersInterferon Beta-1a28445
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersOzanimod 0.5 mg5453
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersOzanimod 1 mg5448
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsInterferon Beta-1a36445
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsOzanimod 0.5 mg44453
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsOzanimod 1 mg30448
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsInterferon Beta-1a24445

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInterferon Beta-1a
Total, all-cause mortalityOzanimod 0.5 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityOzanimod 1 mg
Total, other adverse eventsInterferon Beta-1a273445
Total, other adverse eventsOzanimod 0.5 mg88453
Total, other adverse eventsOzanimod 1 mg57448
Total, serious adverse eventsInterferon Beta-1a11445
Total, serious adverse eventsOzanimod 0.5 mg16453
Total, serious adverse eventsOzanimod 1 mg13448

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31492651BACKGROUNDPubMed
33454584DERIVEDPubMed
40462564DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Symbol CodingSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02294058

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02294058/results?page=2