ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02299297

Study To Evaluate The Efficacy Of Tofacitinib In Moderate To Severe Alopecia Areata, Totalis And Universalis

NCT02299297, Phase 2, Completed, Columbia University; results first posted 2019-05-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study To Evaluate The Efficacy Of Tofacitinib In Moderate To Severe Alopecia Areata, Totalis And Universalis. Trials, record NCT02299297. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02299297

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study To Evaluate The Efficacy Of Tofacitinib In Moderate To Severe Alopecia Areata, Totalis And Universalis
NCT number
NCT02299297
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
12 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Conditions
Alopecia Areata
Interventions
Tofacitinib
First posted
2014-11-24
Last updated
2019-05-07
Results first posted
2019-05-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTotal Number of RespondersBaseline up to between 24 and 72 weeks
This is defined as 50% or greater hair re-growth from baseline as assessed by the Severity of ALopecia Tool (SALT) score after up to 24 weeks/6 months to 72 weeks/18 months of treatment. This is a relatively strict definition for defining responders and non-responders and was chosen to minimize the potential for spontaneous remission, in which fewer than 10% are expected to achieve this magnitude of hair regrowth spontaneously.
SecondaryTotal Number of Responders Maintaining Response During the Post-Treatment Follow Up PeriodWeek 24
To assess the durability of responses, patients who achieve 50% regrowth from baseline during the first 6 to 18 months, will continue to be followed for an additional 6 months post-treatment or until it is determined that relapse has occurred. Durability of response was measured by comparing SALT scores from baseline to 24 weeks after treatment.
SecondaryTotal Number of Responders With Change in PHYSICIAN Global Assessment ScoreUp to 24 weeksA physician's assessment of the severity of disease based on a 6-point scale (score of 0 = clear and 5 = very severe). Responders are defined by participants who exhibited regrowth.
SecondaryPercentage of RegrowthBaseline up to between 24 and 72 weeksPercentage of regrowth was measured by comparing the SALT score at the beginning and end of treatment.
SecondaryDermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreUp to 24 weeks
The first dermatology-specific Quality of Life instrument. It is a simple 10-question validated questionnaire used to evaluate patient's quality of life. The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTotal Number of RespondersBaseline up to between 24 and 72 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTotal Number of Responders Maintaining Response During the Post-Treatment Follow Up PeriodWeek 24ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTotal Number of Responders With Change in PHYSICIAN Global Assessment ScoreUp to 24 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of RegrowthBaseline up to between 24 and 72 weekspercentage of regrowthMEAN
SECONDARYDermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreUp to 24 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN

Results by group7

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Total Number of RespondersTofacitinib8Participants
Total Number of Responders Maintaining Response During the Post-Treatment Follow Up PeriodTofacitinib3Participants
Total Number of Responders With Change in PHYSICIAN Global Assessment ScoreTofacitinib8Participants
Percentage of RegrowthTofacitinib56.8Full Range 12.1 to 100percentage of regrowth
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreTofacitinibBaseline6.5Standard Deviation 5.0score on a scale
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreTofacitinib3 months5.2Standard Deviation 6.7score on a scale
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ScoreTofacitinib6 months6Standard Deviation 6.9score on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTofacitinib12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTofacitinib11
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTofacitinib1

Adverse events17

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory infectionInfections and infestationsTofacitinib111211
otherincreased bowel movement frequencyRenal and urinary disordersTofacitinib4124
otherBlood on urinalysisBlood and lymphatic system disordersTofacitinib4124
otherLoose stoolsMetabolism and nutrition disordersTofacitinib3123
otherMild acneGeneral disordersTofacitinib3123
otherWeight gainMetabolism and nutrition disordersTofacitinib2122
otherAsymptomatic bacteriuriaInfections and infestationsTofacitinib2122
otherHypertensive urgencyVascular disordersTofacitinib1121
otherBloatingGeneral disordersTofacitinib1121
otherConstipationMetabolism and nutrition disordersTofacitinib1121

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTofacitinib012
Total, other adverse eventsTofacitinib1212
Total, serious adverse eventsTofacitinib012

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29452121DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02299297

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02299297/registered