ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02301143

Phase 2 Nab® -Paclitaxel (Abraxane®) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC)

NCT02301143, Phase 2, Completed, Celgene; results first posted 2019-01-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Phase 2 Nab® -Paclitaxel (Abraxane®) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC). Trials, record NCT02301143. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02301143

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Phase 2 Nab® -Paclitaxel (Abraxane®) Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC)
NCT number
NCT02301143
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
107 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Conditions
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Interventions
nab-Paclitaxel, Gemcitabine, Chemoradiation, Capecitabine, Surgery
First posted
2014-11-25
Last updated
2019-03-20
Results first posted
2019-01-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months; (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)
TTF was defined as the time after the first dose of study therapy to discontinuation of study therapy due to disease progression, death by any cause, or the start of a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy/surgery. If a participant does not progress, die or start a new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy, the participant was censored on the last tumor assessment date. Tumor evaluations of CT or MRI scans were assessed by the investigative sites and response determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1. The definition for progressive disease (PD) was \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir, and the sum showed an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression. Median and its 90% confidence interval (CI) of TTF were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.1Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or PR or SD from of date of first treatment to 16 weeks. Tumor assessments after start of non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy were excluded. RECIST 1.1 Definition: * CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed. * PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed. * SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for PD. The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method.
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.1Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeks
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants that achieved a combined incidence of complete (CR) and partial response (PR) using RECIST 1.1 guidelines as assessed by the investigator. Assessments after new non-protocol-defined anticancer therapy are excluded. For participants who had resectable surgery in Investigator Choice period, assessments after surgical intervention are excluded. RECIST 1.1 Definition: * CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm and no new lesions diagnosed. * PR: a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline; no evidence of progression in any of the non-target lesions diagnosed at baseline; and no new lesions diagnosed. The two-sided 90% binomial confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Wilson score method
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of disease progression or death (by any cause), whichever is earlier. The analysis day was calculated from enrollment date for one participant who was not treated. Participants who have no disease progression or have not died were censored to last tumor assessment date with progression-free. The definition for progressive disease (PD) was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir; the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of \>= 5 mm; the progression of a non-target lesion or the appearance of any new lesions is also considered progression. Median and its 90% confidence interval of PFS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)Day 1 of study treatment up to 31.34 months (maximum time for survival follow-up)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study therapy to the date of death (by any cause). Participants who were alive at the end of study or clinical data cut were censored on the last known time that the participant was alive or the clinical cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Median and its 90% confidence interval of OS were estimated using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley
Secondary
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 - 100 scale. In the Global Health Status and 5 functional scales, 0 = worst possible quality of life/health status and 100 = best possible quality of life/health status. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 increase from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 decrease from baseline
SecondaryParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 6 single symptom items, and 1 global health status / quality of life scale. No item occurs in more than one scale. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. In the symptom scales and single symptom items, 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=10 decrease from baseline - Stable: neither increase nor decrease \>10 - Worsened: \>=10 increase from baseline
SecondaryParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Six summary scales reported are: - Pancreatic Pain - Digestive Symptoms - Altered Bowel Habits - Hepatic Scale - Body Image - Sexuality Scores of 0 = optimal health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Secondary
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care Scale
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The summary scale for Satisfaction with Health Care is reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = not satisfied, worst possible health state and 100 = extremely satisfied, best possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID increase from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID decrease from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation
Secondary
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item Scores
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visit
The EORTC pancreatic cancer module is a validated tool intended for patients at all disease stages undergoing surgical resection, palliative surgical intervention, endoscopic palliation or palliative chemotherapy. The module includes 26 questions, organized into 7 scales and 10 individual item scores. The 10 individual item scores are reported. All reported measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Scores of 0 = best possible health state and 100 = worst possible health state. The best score on treatment is the best score from all post-baseline visits and is compared to the baseline to get the following responder categories. Responder categories: - Improved: \>=MID decrease from baseline - Stable: no increase or decrease \>MID - Worsened: \>=MID increase from baseline MID = half the baseline standard deviation

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months; (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)Intent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.1Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeksIntent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.1Day 1 of study treatment up to the end of investigator choice period plus 28 days; up to 76.9 weeksIntent to treat population was defined as all participants who were enrolled into the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Day 1 of study treatment up to 28.75 months (maximum time for the last tumor assessment)Intent to treat population was defined as all participants who were enrolled into the study.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)Day 1 of study treatment up to 31.34 months (maximum time for survival follow-up)Intent to treat population was defined as all participants who were enrolled into the study.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitIntent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Symptom Scales and Single Symptom ItemsBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitIntent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYParticipant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Six Summary ScalesBaseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitIntent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARY
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): Satisfaction With Health Care Scale
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitIntent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARY
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire For Pancreatic Cancer (EORTC-QLQ PAN26): 10 Individual Item Scores
Baseline (Day -1), Day 1 of each cycle, for up to 19 cycles each cycle consisting of 28 days and the 28-day follow-up visitIntent to treat population was defined as all participants enrolled into the study with both baseline and post baseline values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group129

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine9.090% Confidence Interval 7.26 to 10.05months
Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 16 Weeks According to RECIST Version 1.1Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine77.690% Confidence Interval 70.3 to 83.5percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Complete (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.1Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine39.390% Confidence Interval 31.8 to 47.2percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine10.990% Confidence Interval 9.26 to 11.63months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine18.890% Confidence Interval 14.95 to 24.02months
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineGlobal Health Status: Improved43Participants
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineGlobal Health Status: Stable34Participants
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabineGlobal Health Status: Worsened18Participants
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabinePhysical Functioning Scale: Improved20Participants
Participant Counts in Response Categories Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status and 5 Functioning Scales
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus GemcitabinePhysical Functioning Scale: Stable66Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Induction PeriodSTARTEDNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine107
Induction PeriodSTARTEDInvestigator Choice0
Induction PeriodCOMPLETEDNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine62
Induction PeriodCOMPLETEDInvestigator Choice0
Induction PeriodNOT COMPLETEDNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine45
Induction PeriodNOT COMPLETEDInvestigator Choice0
Investigator's ChoiceSTARTEDNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine0
Investigator's ChoiceSTARTEDInvestigator Choice47
Investigator's ChoiceCOMPLETEDNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine0
Investigator's ChoiceCOMPLETEDInvestigator Choice37

Adverse events212

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)49106
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)49106
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)7106
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)7106
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)6106
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)6106
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)44106
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)45106
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)25106
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)27106

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)42106
Total, all-cause mortalityNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)67106
Total, other adverse eventsNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)104106
Total, other adverse eventsNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)104106
Total, serious adverse eventsNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period)38106
Total, serious adverse eventsNab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall)39106

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31953079DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period) vs Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Induction Period) vs Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (Overall): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02301143

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02301143/results?page=2