ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02304757

99Tc-MDP in Postmenopausal Women With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Osteoporosis

NCT02304757, Not applicable, Completed, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; results first posted 2021-10-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. 99Tc-MDP in Postmenopausal Women With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Osteoporosis. Trials, record NCT02304757. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02304757

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
99Tc-MDP in Postmenopausal Women With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Osteoporosis
NCT number
NCT02304757
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
142 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Conditions
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Osteoporosis
Interventions
99Tc-MDP, Fosamax
First posted
2014-12-02
Last updated
2021-11-17
Results first posted
2021-10-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and Hipbaseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsPercent change of bone mineral density in lumbar and hip by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
SecondaryBone Turnover Markersbaseline and 12 monthsbone turnover markers including C-telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX), Type I N-procollagen terminal propeptide(PINP)
SecondaryHealth Related Quality of Life by 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey Questionnaire (0-100)baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
The health related quality of life was measured by 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey questionnaire (SF-36). The minimum and maximum values were 0 and 100, respectively. Higher scores mean a better a better outcome. The questionnaire includes 36 items that can be classified into the following eight health status subscales: Physical Functioning, Physical Role Limitations, Bodily Pain, General Health Perception, Vitality, Social Functioning, Emotional Role Limitations, and Mental Health. A standardized Physical Component Summary and a standardized mental component score were calculated. The physical component summary and mental component summary represent the deviation from the reference population in Sweden. Higher scores mean a better a better outcome.
SecondarySide Effects6 months, and 12 monthsA transient rash and phlebitis, gastrointestinal reaction.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and Hipbaseline, 6 months, and 12 monthspercentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYBone Turnover Markersbaseline and 12 monthsng/mlMEAN
SECONDARYHealth Related Quality of Life by 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey Questionnaire (0-100)baseline, 6 months, and 12 monthsscores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSide Effects6 months, and 12 monthsside effectsNUMBER

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and Hip99Tc-MDPPercentage change of lumbar spine at month 63.0Standard Deviation 6.6percentage change
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and HipFosamaxPercentage change of lumbar spine at month 63.2Standard Deviation 7.1percentage change
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and Hip99Tc-MDPPercentage change of lumbar spine month 123.8Standard Deviation 10.9percentage change
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and HipFosamaxPercentage change of lumbar spine month 125.1Standard Deviation 6.1percentage change
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and Hip99Tc-MDPPercentage change of total hip at month 60.9Standard Deviation 7.7percentage change
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and HipFosamaxPercentage change of total hip at month 64.9Standard Deviation 7.7percentage change
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and Hip99Tc-MDPPercentage change of total hip at month 125.1Standard Deviation 17percentage change
Percent Change of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar and HipFosamaxPercentage change of total hip at month 124.6Standard Deviation 9.6percentage change
Bone Turnover Markers99Tc-MDPPINP before treatment43.7725Standard Deviation 14.74802ng/ml
Bone Turnover MarkersFosamaxPINP before treatment29.255Standard Deviation 29.46603ng/ml

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED99Tc-MDP70
Overall StudySTARTEDFosamax72
Overall StudyCOMPLETED99Tc-MDP70
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFosamax72
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED99Tc-MDP0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFosamax0

Adverse events2

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherupper gastrointestinal (GI) adverse eventsGastrointestinal disorders99Tc-MDP0700
otherupper gastrointestinal (GI) adverse eventsGastrointestinal disordersFosamax67272

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality99Tc-MDP070
Total, all-cause mortalityFosamax072
Total, other adverse events99Tc-MDP070
Total, other adverse eventsFosamax672
Total, serious adverse events99Tc-MDP070
Total, serious adverse eventsFosamax072

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
99Tc-MDP vs Fosamax: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
99Tc-MDP vs Fosamax: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02304757

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02304757/results?page=2