ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02339571

A Phase II/III Trial of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and GM-CSF in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

NCT02339571, Phase 2, Phase 3, Active not recruiting, National Cancer Institute (NCI)

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Phase II/III Trial of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and GM-CSF in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. Trials, record NCT02339571. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02339571

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Phase II/III Trial of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and GM-CSF in Patients With Advanced Melanoma
NCT number
NCT02339571
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
600 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma AJCC v7, Stage IV Cutaneous Melanoma AJCC v6 and v7
Interventions
Biospecimen Collection, Computed Tomography, Echocardiography Test, Ipilimumab, Magnetic Resonance Elastography, Multigated Acquisition Scan, Nivolumab, Sargramostim
First posted
2015-01-15
Last updated
2026-11-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall survivalTime from randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival between the two arms will be compared using the stratified log-rank test. One-sided type I error rate of 0.2 will be used. Kaplan-Meier plot will be generated and two-sided p-values will be reported. This analysis will be summarized using the forest plots with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Cox multivariate models will be developed for overall survival.
SecondaryProgression free survivalTime from randomization to disease progression or death (whichever occurs first), assessed up to 5 years
Evaluated based on international criteria proposed by the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guideline (version 1.1). This analysis will be summarized using the forest plots with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Cox multivariate models will be developed for progression free survival.
SecondaryIncidence of toxicitiesUp to 90 days after the last study drug administration
Defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 criteria. Individual toxicity type adverse event and categorized adverse event data (by autoimmune disorders, endocrine, gastrointestinal, liver, nervous system, pancreas, psychiatric disorders, skin, thromboembolic disorders) will be summarized by grade and treatment arm. The percentages of patients experiencing the worst degree toxicities (highest grade event per adverse event type per patient) will be evaluated and the distribution of the worst degree toxicities will be compared among the treatment arms. The proportion of patients with worst degree toxicities with 3 or higher will be summarized and compared among the treatment arms.
SecondaryImmune responseUp to 5 years
Assessed using the utility of immune related response criteria. The immune related response criteria and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based clinical response data will be compared between the two treatment arms, using the Fisher's exact test. Two-sided p-values will be reported. Furthermore immune related response criteria data will be associated with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based clinical response. The Kappa statistics which measures the degree of agreement between the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based response and immune related response criteria will be estimated. McNemar's test will be used to evaluate the agreement between immune related response criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based clinical response.
SecondaryClinical responseUp to 5 years
Assessed using the utility of immune related response criteria. Standard response criteria (based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) will be applied to assess clinical response. The immune related response criteria and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based clinical response data will be compared between the two treatment arms, using the Fisher's exact test. Two-sided p-values will be reported. Furthermore immune related response criteria data will be associated with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based clinical response. The Kappa statistics which measures the degree of agreement between the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based response and immune related response criteria will be estimated. McNemar's test will be used to evaluate the agreement between immune related response criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-based clinical response.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants2

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10CA180820ECOG-ACRIN Network Group Operations CenterODwyer, Peter J; SCHNALL, MITCHELL D.ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2026NIH RePORTER
U24CA196172ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNJEWELL, SCOTT D; HAMILTON, STANLEY R.ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2015 to 2025NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02339571

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02339571/registered