ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02344004

Study to Evaluate Efficacy of LAI When Added to Multi-drug Regimen Compared to Multi-drug Regimen Alone

NCT02344004, Phase 3, Completed, Insmed Incorporated; results first posted 2018-11-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate Efficacy of LAI When Added to Multi-drug Regimen Compared to Multi-drug Regimen Alone. Trials, record NCT02344004. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02344004

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate Efficacy of LAI When Added to Multi-drug Regimen Compared to Multi-drug Regimen Alone
NCT number
NCT02344004
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
336 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Insmed Incorporated
Conditions
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous
Interventions
LAI (Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation) 590 mg
First posted
2015-01-22
Last updated
2020-05-07
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-005010-31
Results first posted
2018-11-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armby Month 6
Sputum specimens were collected at Screening (Visit 1), Baseline (Visit 2), and at Visits 3 (Month 1) through 8 (Month 6). A negative culture result reflected a negative culture result for all sputum samples collected at each visit. Participants met the primary endpoint of culture conversion by Month 6 if they had 3 consecutive monthly MAC-negative sputum cultures during the first 6 months of the study. A participant needed to achieve the first of 3 consecutive negative sputum cultures (that defined culture conversion) by Month 4 in order to meet the primary endpoint by Month 6. Each participant in the intent to treat (ITT) population (ie, all randomized participants) was classified as either a converter or non-converter by Month 6.
PrimaryNumber of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Aloneup to Month 19
Sputum specimens were collected at screening, baseline (Day 1), during treatment, and at Months 1, 3, 6, and 12 months off treatment. Culture conversion with durability was defined as achieving culture conversion by Month 6 and then having no more than 2 consecutive broth positive cultures and no Agar positive culture up to 3 months off treatment. Converters with missing broth or Agar sputum culture result after Month 6 up to 3 months off treatment were considered as not achieving culture conversion with durability except those participants who are unable to produce sputum despite reasonable efforts, as reported by source documentation. Participants who had relapse/recurrence, had "rescue" medication and/or died before reaching 3 months off treatment were considered as not achieving culture conversion with durability.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armat Month 6
A 6-minute walk assessment of exertional capability was performed at Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6. The standardized protocol based on the ATS guidelines was used. The 6MWT was conducted by a site member who was blinded to the participant's open-label treatment assignment. The analysis of the change from Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the 6MWT distance was performed after the last participant completed Month 6 and his/her 6MWT distance data were available.
SecondaryTime to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armby Month 6
The time to culture conversion was defined by the date of the first of at least 3 consecutive monthly culture specimens that were Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)-negative. The 25th percentile time to conversion is the estimated time taken for 25% of participants to convert. The 50th percentile time to conversion is the estimated time taken for 50% of participants to convert.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Aloneup to Month 16
Sustained conversion was evaluated in participants who completed at least 12 months of treatment from the start of culture conversion. Sustained conversion was defined as conversion (3 consecutive negative monthly sputum samples) by Month 6 with no positive agar media culture or no more than 2 broth media cultures up to and including the time point. Participants who did not convert were considered non-sustained conversions.
SecondaryChange in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at EOT in the LAI Arm Compared to a Multi-drug Regimen Aloneup to Month 16
A 6-minute walk assessment of exertional capability was performed at Baseline (Day 1) and up to EOT or Month 16. The standardized protocol based on the ATS guidelines was used. The 6MWT was conducted by a site member who was blinded to the participant's open-label treatment assignment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Scoreat Month 6
The SGRQ was completed before administration of study drug at Baseline (Day 1) and Months 3, 6, 8, and 12, and at the EOT visit and the 3 months off treatment visit. The SGRQ is a self-administered questionnaire that has been validated in participants with airways disease, specifically in participants with bronchiectasis. The SGRQ assesses health-related quality of life in participants with chronic pulmonary disease by evaluating 3 health domains: symptoms (distress caused by respiratory symptoms); activity (effects of disturbances on mobility and physical activity); and impacts (the effect of disease on factors such as employment, personal control of one's health, and need for medication). A composite total score is derived as the sum of domain scores for symptoms, activity, and impact (0 = best possible score and 100 = worst possible score). A within patient reduction from baseline in score of 4 units is generally recognized as a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armby Month 6
The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Aloneup to Month 19
The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armat Month 6
The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.
metersMEAN
SECONDARYTime to Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone Armby Month 6There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.monthsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving Sustained Culture Conversion at the End of Treatment (EOT) in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm Aloneup to Month 16
The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance at EOT in the LAI Arm Compared to a Multi-drug Regimen Aloneup to Month 16Due to the widely varying timepoints that makeup the EOT visit, this was not considered an appropriate analysis and was not performed.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline (Day 1) at Month 6 in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Scoreat Month 6
The ITT population was the set of all randomized participants. Participants were classified according to their assigned treatment. There was a total of 336 participants in the ITT population, including 224 participants in the LAI + MDR arm and 112 participants in the MDR alone arm.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmLAI + Multi-drug RegimenConverter65Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmMulti-drug RegimenConverter10Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmLAI + Multi-drug RegimenNon-Converter159Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Culture Conversion by Month 6 in the Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation (LAI) + Multi-drug Regimen (MDR) Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmMulti-drug RegimenNon-Converter102Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneLAI + Multi-drug RegimenDurable Conversion36Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneMulti-drug RegimenDurable Conversion0Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneLAI + Multi-drug RegimenNon-Durable Conversion188Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Durable Culture Conversion Through 3 Months Off Treatment in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Arm AloneMulti-drug RegimenNon-Durable Conversion112Participants
Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmLAI + Multi-drug RegimenBaseline424.2Standard Deviation 1.12meters
Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Month 6 in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Distance in the LAI + MDR Arm Compared to the MDR Alone ArmMulti-drug RegimenBaseline420.9Standard Deviation 0.48meters

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLAI + Multi-drug Regimen224
Overall StudySTARTEDMulti-drug Regimen112
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLAI + Multi-drug Regimen163
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMulti-drug Regimen98
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLAI + Multi-drug Regimen61
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMulti-drug Regimen14

Adverse events174

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDysphoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLAI + Multi-drug Regimen104223140
otherDysphoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMulti-drug Regimen21122
otherCoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLAI + Multi-drug Regimen85223111
otherCoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMulti-drug Regimen1711220
otherDyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLAI + Multi-drug Regimen4722359
otherDyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMulti-drug Regimen1011210
otherHaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLAI + Multi-drug Regimen3722348
otherHaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMulti-drug Regimen1411217
otherOropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersLAI + Multi-drug Regimen2422330
otherOropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersMulti-drug Regimen21122

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLAI + Multi-drug Regimen11223
Total, all-cause mortalityMulti-drug Regimen8112
Total, other adverse eventsLAI + Multi-drug Regimen199223
Total, other adverse eventsMulti-drug Regimen72112
Total, serious adverse eventsLAI + Multi-drug Regimen45223
Total, serious adverse eventsMulti-drug Regimen23112

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30216086DERIVEDPubMed
33595792DERIVEDPubMed
33887244DERIVEDPubMed
38277865DERIVEDPubMed
41186908DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
LAI + Multi-drug Regimen vs Multi-drug Regimen: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
LAI + Multi-drug Regimen vs Multi-drug Regimen: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02344004

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02344004/results?page=2