ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02348606

"Twelve-week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA"

NCT02348606, Phase 3, Completed, Jazz Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2019-07-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. "Twelve-week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA". Trials, record NCT02348606. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02348606

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
"Twelve-week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA"
NCT number
NCT02348606
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
476 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Interventions
JZP-110, Placebo oral tablet
First posted
2015-01-28
Last updated
2019-07-23
Results first posted
2019-07-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline to Week 12Change in mean sleep latency time (in minutes) as determined from the first 4 trials of a 40-minute MWT from baseline to Week 12.
PrimaryChange in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 12Baseline to Week 12
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from Baseline to Week 12. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness. The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. The response variable was the change in ESS score from baseline.
SecondarySubjects Reported Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc) at Week 1212 Weeks
Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the PGIc at Week 12. PGIc was rated by subjects and measures the change in their condition since start of treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. This is the key secondary endpoint.
SecondaryChange in Sleep Latency Time on Each of the 5 MWT Trials at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Time course of efficacy in MWT: Change in sleep latency (in minutes) on each of the 5 MWT trials at week 12.
SecondaryChange in the Mean Sleep Latency Time as Determined From the First 4 Trials of a 40-minute MWT From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Change in mean sleep latency time (in minutes) as determined from the first 4 trials of a 40-minute MWT from baseline to week 4.
SecondaryChange in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, and 8. A negative change from baseline represents improvement in excessive sleepiness. The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the analysis of ESS scores. The response variable was the change in ESS score from baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the PGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the PGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8. PGIc was rated by subjects and measures the change in their condition since treatment start on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc) at Week 12Week 12
Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the CGIc at Week 12. CGIc was rated by clinicians and measures the change in the subject's condition since treatment starts on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very much improved to 7= very much worse.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the CGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Percentage of subjects reported as improved (minimally, much, or very much) on the CGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8. CGIc was rated by clinicians and measures the change in the subject's condition since treatment starts on a 7-point scale ranging from 1= very much improved to 7= very much worse.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline to Week 12Fifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the Modified Intent-to Treat (mITT) Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.minutesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 12Baseline to Week 12Fifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the mITT Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.points on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYSubjects Reported Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIc) at Week 1212 WeeksFifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the mITT Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Sleep Latency Time on Each of the 5 MWT Trials at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Fifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the mITT Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.minutesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Mean Sleep Latency Time as Determined From the First 4 Trials of a 40-minute MWT From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Fifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the mITT Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.minutesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, and 8points on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the PGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8Weeks 1, 4, and 8Fifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the mITT Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIc) at Week 12Week 12Fifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the mITT Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Reported as Improved on the CGIc at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 8Weeks 1, 4, and 8Fifteen subjects in the Safety Population were excluded from the mITT Population resulting in a total of 459 subjects.percentage of subjectsNUMBER

Results by group95

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 1237.5 mg of JZP-1104.74Standard Error 1.418minutes
Change in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 1275 mg of JZP-1109.08Standard Error 1.358minutes
Change in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 12150 mg of JZP-11010.96Standard Error 0.973minutes
Change in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 12300 mg of JZP-11012.99Standard Error 1.038minutes
Change in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) From Baseline to Week 12Placebo0.21Standard Error 0.997minutes
Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 1237.5 mg of JZP-110-5.1Standard Error 0.64points on a scale
Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 1275 mg of JZP-110-5.0Standard Error 0.62points on a scale
Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 12150 mg of JZP-110-7.7Standard Error 0.44points on a scale
Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 12300 mg of JZP-110-7.9Standard Error 0.46points on a scale
Change in ESS Score From Baseline to Week 12Placebo-3.3Standard Error 0.45points on a scale

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED37.5 mg of JZP-11058
Overall StudySTARTED75 mg of JZP-11062
Overall StudySTARTED150 mg of JZP-110117
Overall StudySTARTED300 mg of JZP-110118
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo119
Overall StudyCOMPLETED37.5 mg of JZP-11049
Overall StudyCOMPLETED75 mg of JZP-11054
Overall StudyCOMPLETED150 mg of JZP-110106
Overall StudyCOMPLETED300 mg of JZP-11094
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo101

Adverse events95

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disorders37.5 mg of JZP-110458
otherHeadacheNervous system disorders75 mg of JZP-110562
otherHeadacheNervous system disorders150 mg of JZP-11010117
otherHeadacheNervous system disorders300 mg of JZP-11017118
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo10119
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disorders37.5 mg of JZP-110358
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disorders75 mg of JZP-110362
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disorders150 mg of JZP-1101117
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disorders300 mg of JZP-1107118
otherFeeling jitteryGeneral disordersPlacebo0119

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality37.5 mg of JZP-110058
Total, all-cause mortality75 mg of JZP-110062
Total, all-cause mortality150 mg of JZP-1100117
Total, all-cause mortality300 mg of JZP-1100118
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0119
Total, other adverse events37.5 mg of JZP-1101758
Total, other adverse events75 mg of JZP-1102162
Total, other adverse events150 mg of JZP-11041117
Total, other adverse events300 mg of JZP-11060118
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo30119

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30521757DERIVEDPubMed
32353246DERIVEDPubMed
33226332DERIVEDPubMed
33394323DERIVEDPubMed
33631141DERIVEDPubMed
34283019DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02348606

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02348606/results?page=2