ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02357901

Treatment Seeking Participants With Opioid Use Disorders Assessing Tolerability of Depot Injections of Buprenorphine

NCT02357901, Phase 3, Completed, Indivior Inc.; results first posted 2018-02-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Treatment Seeking Participants With Opioid Use Disorders Assessing Tolerability of Depot Injections of Buprenorphine. Trials, record NCT02357901. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02357901

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Treatment Seeking Participants With Opioid Use Disorders Assessing Tolerability of Depot Injections of Buprenorphine
NCT number
NCT02357901
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
665 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Indivior Inc.
Conditions
Opioid Dependence, Opioid Related Disorders
Interventions
SUBOXONE, RBP-6000, Placebo
First posted
2015-02-06
Last updated
2018-02-20
Results first posted
2018-02-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24Weekly from Weeks 5-24
Data represent the count of participants at various percentage abstinence levels. Abstinence was defined as urine samples being negative for opioids AND negative self-reports (obtained from Timeline Followback (TLFB) interviews) for illicit opioid use. The primary endpoint was based on visits in which paired urine samples and self-reports were expected for each subject as specified in the schedule of events. Missing urine drug screen(s) (UDS) samples and/or self-reports were considered as non-negative.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Considered A Treatment SuccessWeeks 5-24Treatment success is defined as a participant having ≥80% of urine samples negative for opioids combined with self-reports negative for illicit opioid use between weeks 5-24.
SecondaryCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids From Week 5 Through Week 24Weekly from Weeks 5-24Data represent the count of participants at various percentage levels in which urine samples tested negative for opioids. All missing reports for urine samples were considered non-negative.
SecondaryCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use From Week 5 Through Week 24Weekly from Weeks 5-24
Data represent the count of participants at various percentage levels in which self-reports were negative for illicit use of opioids. Self-reports were obtained from Timeline Followback (TLFB) interviews. All missing self-reports were considered non-negative.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Opioid Craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Prior to Injections From Week 5 Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Weeks 5-24
The opioid craving scale was a 100 mm scale with 0= 'no craving' on the left end and 100= 'strongest craving ever' on the right end of the scale. Participants marked where along the scale reflected their craving for opioids. The full range of the change from baseline scale was therefore 100 (no craving at baseline, strongest craving during study) to -100 (strongest craving at baseline, no craving during study). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection on Day 1. The opioid craving VAS was completed each week; measurements were taken prior to dosing on weeks 5, 9, 13, 17 and 21. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of craving symptoms. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with terms for treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as factors and baseline value as a covariate. Center was included in the model as a random effect.
SecondaryParticipants Who Complete the Week 24 Visit ("Completers")Week 24A completer was defined as a participant who completed either the urine drug screen (UDS) or Timeline Followback (TLFB) assessment at the Week 24 visit.
SecondaryParticipants Who Are Abstinent at Week 24Week 24Participants with both a negative urine sample and negative self-report for illicit opioid use at Week 24.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Prior to Injections From Week 5 Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169
The CGI-I was used to rate the change in clinical status since the start of the treatment on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (very much improved; nearly all better; good level of functioning; minimal symptoms; represents a very substantial change) to 7 (very much worse; severe exacerbation of symptoms and loss of functioning). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection on Day 1. Measurements taken during the treatment period were taken at the end of each 28 day treatment and prior to dosing of the next treatment. Negative change from baseline values indicate an improved clinical global impression. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with terms for treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as factors and baseline value as a covariate. Center was included in the model as a random effect.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) Prior to Injections From Week 5 Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169
The CGI-S was an assessment completed by the clinician to rate the severity of symptoms on an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill subjects; pathology drastically interferes in many life functions). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection on Day 1. Measurements taken during the treatment period were taken at the end of each 28 day treatment and prior to dosing of the next treatment. Negative change from baseline values indicate an improvement in the severity of symptoms. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with terms for treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as factors and baseline value as a covariate. Center was included in the model as a random effect.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Baseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Baseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Days 2, 8, 5, 22, 29, 30, 36, 43, 50, 57, 58, 64, 71, 78, 85, 86, 92, 99, 106, 113, 114, 120, 127, 134, 141, 142, 148, 155, 162, 169
COWS is an 11-item instrument used to assess signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal (Wesson et al., 1999). The score is the sum of the responses for a total range of 0-48. The COWS is commonly used by clinicians treating patients with buprenorphine to monitor the severity of withdrawal. COWS scores below 5 are considered not indicative of withdrawal. Scores from 5 to 12 are considered mild withdrawal; from 13 to 24 moderate withdrawal; 25 to 36 moderately severe withdrawal, and 37-48 severe withdrawal. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of withdrawal symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection on Day 1. The COWS was completed each week; measurements were taken prior to dosing on weeks 5, 9, 13, 17 and 21. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with terms for treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as factors and baseline value as a covariate.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24Weekly from Weeks 5-24Full analysis setParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Considered A Treatment SuccessWeeks 5-24Full analysis setpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids From Week 5 Through Week 24Weekly from Weeks 5-24Full analysis setParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use From Week 5 Through Week 24Weekly from Weeks 5-24Full analysis setParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Opioid Craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Prior to Injections From Week 5 Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Weeks 5-24Full analysis set of participants who had available data on baseline score and change from baseline in any visit through week 24.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYParticipants Who Complete the Week 24 Visit (Completers)Week 24Full analysis setParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYParticipants Who Are Abstinent at Week 24Week 24Full analysis setParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Prior to Injections From Week 5 Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169Full analysis set of participants who had available data on baseline score and change from baseline in any visit through week 24.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity Scale (CGI-S) Prior to Injections From Week 5 Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Days 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169Full analysis set of participants who had available data on baseline score and change from baseline in any visit through week 24.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) Through Week 24 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Baseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Baseline: Day 1 (prior to dosing), Days 2, 8, 5, 22, 29, 30, 36, 43, 50, 57, 58, 64, 71, 78, 85, 86, 92, 99, 106, 113, 114, 120, 127, 134, 141, 142, 148, 155, 162, 169
Full analysis set of participants who had available data on baseline score and change from baseline in any visit through week 24.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group168

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24RBP-6000 300mg/100mg>=0%194Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24RBP-6000 300mg/300mg>=0%196Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24Combined Placebo>=0%99Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24RBP-6000 300mg/100mg>=10%139Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24RBP-6000 300mg/300mg>=10%126Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24Combined Placebo>=10%11Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24RBP-6000 300mg/100mg>=20%115Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24RBP-6000 300mg/300mg>=20%111Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24Combined Placebo>=20%7Participants
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage of Urine Samples Negative for Opioids Combined With Self-Reports Negative for Illicit Opioid Use Collected From Week 5 Through Week 24RBP-6000 300mg/100mg>=30%101Participants

Participant flow32

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)STARTEDRun-In Period665
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)STARTEDRBP-6000 300mg/100mg0
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)STARTEDRBP-6000 300mg/300mg0
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)STARTEDCombined Placebo0
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)COMPLETEDRun-In Period504
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)COMPLETEDRBP-6000 300mg/100mg0
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)COMPLETEDRBP-6000 300mg/300mg0
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)COMPLETEDCombined Placebo0
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)NOT COMPLETEDRun-In Period161
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)NOT COMPLETEDRBP-6000 300mg/100mg0

Adverse events81

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRBP-6000 300mg/100mg19203
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRBP-6000 300mg/300mg17201
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersCombined Placebo6100
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRBP-6000 300mg/100mg19203
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRBP-6000 300mg/300mg16201
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersCombined Placebo0100
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRBP-6000 300mg/100mg18203
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRBP-6000 300mg/300mg16201
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCombined Placebo5100
otherInjection site pruritusGeneral disordersRBP-6000 300mg/100mg13203

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRBP-6000 300mg/100mg0203
Total, all-cause mortalityRBP-6000 300mg/300mg1201
Total, all-cause mortalityCombined Placebo0100
Total, other adverse eventsRBP-6000 300mg/100mg97203
Total, other adverse eventsRBP-6000 300mg/300mg84201
Total, other adverse eventsCombined Placebo27100
Total, serious adverse eventsRBP-6000 300mg/100mg4203
Total, serious adverse eventsRBP-6000 300mg/300mg7201
Total, serious adverse eventsCombined Placebo5100

Papers7

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30792007DERIVEDPubMed
32920647DERIVEDPubMed
34794061DERIVEDPubMed
35287034DERIVEDPubMed
36467036DERIVEDPubMed
37657559DERIVEDPubMed
38042801DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02357901

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02357901/results?page=2