ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Gaming for Autism to Mold Executive Skills Project

NCT02361762, Not applicable, Completed, Boston Children's Hospital; results first posted 2019-02-20

Trial 11

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleGaming for Autism to Mold Executive Skills ProjectClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT02361762ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment70 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorBoston Children's HospitalClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsAutism Spectrum DisordersClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsComputerized executive control trainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2015-02-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2021-07-28ClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2019-02-20ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange Task - Stop Signal Reaction TimeBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Conflict Processing-Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline) Children indicate the location of a picture by pressing the left and right arrow buttons for 75% of the trials (i.e., the dominant task). For the remaining 25% of trials, a stop signal appears and a Change response (i.e., space bar) was required. Stop signals occurred equally at 50, 200, 350, and 500 ms before the anticipated response based on the child's reaction time. The SSRT estimates the latency of inhibitory responding to the stop signal. Lower scores indicate more rapid inhibition.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStroop Task (Difference in Percentage of Correct Responses for Congruent Minus Incongruent Trials)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Conflict Processing-Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline) Trials were presented in three conditions: (1) congruent trials (25%); (2) incongruent trials (25%); and (3) neutral trials (50%). The difference between percent correct for congruent and incongruent conditions was the dependent variable, such that larger differences indicated more difficulty with conflicting information. Lower scores at Post-testing indicate improved ability to suppress interfering/conflicting information.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEvent-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Conflict Processing-Event Related Potential (ERP) Brain Response (N2 mean amplitude) Data were compared for congruent and incongruent conditions at each time point (baseline and post testing). Each trial of the task began with a beep for 150ms paired with a fixation cross for 450ms at the center of the screen. Then, a target and flankers were presented for 2000ms. Congruent trials (50%) consisted of a central target animal flanked by two animals on each side with the same orientation and size as the target. Incongruent trials (50%) were identical except that the target and flankers faced opposite directions. Children pressed a button indicating the direction the target animal faced (50% left, 50% right) and received visual and auditory feedback upon responding.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryBRIEF Parent Survey (Global Executive Composite)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Executive Control at home/school-Generalization (Post-testing controlling for Baseline) Global Executive Composite (GEC) scores are available for parents. The GEC is comprised of two sub-scales: Metacognition and Behavioral Regulation. T-scores are reported for the GEC (range = 30-100). Higher scores reflect more difficulty with executive function. At Post, lower scores represent a better outcome. Note: Teacher BRIEF was originally planned as an outcome measure, but due to low teacher response (10 teachers provided data for each group at both time points) the results were not analyzed.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryBackward Digit Span (Scaled Score)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Working Memory Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline) A control task - not specifically targeted by intervention. Scaled score for Backward Digit Span (higher scores represent better memory). Scaled scores are reported (range = 1-19). Higher scores reflect better working memory (an aspect of executive function). At Post, higher scores represent a better outcome.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySocial Attribution Task (SAT) - Problem Solving ScaleBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Theory of Mind Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline) A measure of generalization.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTheory of Mind Composite: Perception Knowledge, Location Change False Belief, Unexpected-contents False BeliefBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Theory of Mind (TOM) Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline) A measure of generalization Composite score by computing the percent correct (range = 0-100% correct) across three video tasks measuring cognitive aspects of theory of mind (i.e., the Perception Knowledge Task, Location Change False Belief Task, and Unexpected-contents False Belief Task). Higher scores represent better performance (i.e., more correct responses). Higher scores at post testing represent better outcomes.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTOM Test (Theory of Mind Test)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Theory of Mind Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline). A measure of generalization. Overall percent correct across the three sub-scales (i.e., percent correct calculated across all items of Level 1-Precursors, Level 2-First Order False Belief, and Level 3-Advanced) is reported. The percent correct ranges from 0-100% correct. Higher scores represent better theory of mind (affective and first/second order false belief).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySocial Skills Improvement System-Parent (SSIS) - Social Standard ScoreBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Social function home (Post-testing controlling for Baseline). A measure of generalization. Scores were available from parents. The SSIS Social Scale organizes prosocial behaviors into seven areas or subscales: Communication, Cooperation, Assertion, Responsibility, Empathy, Engagement, and Self-Control. Scores range from 40-160. Higher scores reflect more prosocial skills (i.e., better social ability). At Post, higher scores represent a better outcome. Note: Teacher SSIS was originally planned as an outcome measure, but due to low teacher response the results were not analyzed.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNarrative Language TaskBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Social Communication Ability Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline). A measure of generalization.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPerformance on Hungry Donkey Task Assessed as Ratio of Safe to Risky SelectionsBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Conflict Processing (Reward) Behavior (Post-testing controlling for Baseline). Children selected from four doors with varying reward and loss ratios. Two doors have lower rewards but an overall net gain (safe) and two doors have higher rewards but an overall net loss (risky). Scores represent the ratio of safe to risky selections in the final two blocks (of five total blocks administered).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryEvent-related Potentials Assessed During Cued Go/Nogo TaskBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Conflict Processing-ERP Brain Response (N2 mean amplitude) Data were compared for Go and Nogo conditions at each time point (baseline and post testing). The task included 200 test trials. During 'go' trials (70% of trials), children were instructed to press a single button on a keypad each time a letter appeared on the screen. During 'nogo' trials (30% of trials), children were instructed to withhold their response when a specific letter appeared on the screen. To account for the confound of frequency with condition, two letters were used for go trials - an infrequent go (30% of trials) and a frequent go (40% of trials). Go responses were analyzed only for the infrequent go trials. Each trial was preceded by a fixation cross presented on the screen for 500 ms. Test trials were then presented for 700 ms. Only ERPs for correct trials that followed a correct 'go' response were analyzed in order to ensure consistent motor response on the previous trial.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource
PRIMARYChange Task - Stop Signal Reaction TimeBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
Of the 68 children randomized who returned for post testing, data were available for 61 across both time points; one participant was unable to map the correct buttons at baseline, two participants refused the task at post testing, and computer failure occurred for four participants (3 at baseline, 1 at post testing).
milisecondsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYStroop Task (Difference in Percentage of Correct Responses for Congruent Minus Incongruent Trials)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Data were available for 63 children; five children were unable to complete the task or refused to play (3 baseline, 2 at post).difference in % of correct responsesMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYEvent-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)microvoltsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYBRIEF Parent Survey (Global Executive Composite)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)63 parents completed the questionnaire at both time points.scores on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYBackward Digit Span (Scaled Score)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Of the 68 children who completed post testing, 63 provided data at both time points.scores on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYSocial Attribution Task (SAT) - Problem Solving ScaleBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Of the 68 children who returned for post testing, 45 children had sufficient time during visits at both time points for this task.percent correct on SAT problem solvingMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYTheory of Mind Composite: Perception Knowledge, Location Change False Belief, Unexpected-contents False BeliefBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Of the 68 children who returned for post testing, 60 children had sufficient time during visits at both time points to complete these video tasks.percentage of correct responsesMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYTOM Test (Theory of Mind Test)Baseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Of the 68 children who returned for post testing, 67 had sufficient time to complete the TOM Test at both time points.percentage of correct responsesMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYSocial Skills Improvement System-Parent (SSIS) - Social Standard ScoreBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Of the 68 children who returned for post testing, 62 parents completed the SSIS questionnaire at both time points.scores on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYNarrative Language TaskBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Data were not collected.ClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYPerformance on Hungry Donkey Task Assessed as Ratio of Safe to Risky SelectionsBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Of the 68 children who completed post-testing, 64 completed the task at both time points.ratio of safe to risky selectionsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYEvent-related Potentials Assessed During Cued Go/Nogo TaskBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)
This task was always administered after the Child ANT Flanker Task, resulting in fewer children who completed it at both time points. Of the 68 children who returned for post-testing, 31 provided usable, artifact free data at both time points.
microvoltsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
POST_HOCRepetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) - Total ScoreBaseline (Pre Training/Waitlist Phase) and at 11-12 Weeks (Post Training/Waitlist Phase)Of the 68 children who returned for post-testing, data were available for 60 participants.score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov

Results by group 56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource
Change Task - Stop Signal Reaction TimeTrainingBaseline233.8Standard Deviation 87.8milisecondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change Task - Stop Signal Reaction TimeWaitlistBaseline238.3Standard Deviation 94.3milisecondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change Task - Stop Signal Reaction TimeTrainingPost-training/Waitlisted phase213.6Standard Deviation 78.5milisecondsClinicalTrials.gov
Change Task - Stop Signal Reaction TimeWaitlistPost-training/Waitlisted phase234.7Standard Deviation 98.1milisecondsClinicalTrials.gov
Stroop Task (Difference in Percentage of Correct Responses for Congruent Minus Incongruent Trials)TrainingBaseline3.8Standard Deviation 8difference in % of correct responsesClinicalTrials.gov
Stroop Task (Difference in Percentage of Correct Responses for Congruent Minus Incongruent Trials)WaitlistBaseline6.0Standard Deviation 12difference in % of correct responsesClinicalTrials.gov
Stroop Task (Difference in Percentage of Correct Responses for Congruent Minus Incongruent Trials)TrainingPost-Training/Wait-listed phase2.9Standard Deviation 13difference in % of correct responsesClinicalTrials.gov
Stroop Task (Difference in Percentage of Correct Responses for Congruent Minus Incongruent Trials)WaitlistPost-Training/Wait-listed phase3.8Standard Deviation 9difference in % of correct responsesClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskTrainingCongruent - Pre-.20Standard Deviation 3.2microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskWaitlistCongruent - Pre-2.5Standard Deviation 3.3microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskTrainingIncongruent - Pre.83Standard Deviation 3.3microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskWaitlistIncongruent - Pre-3.8Standard Deviation 4.8microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskTrainingCongruent - Post-1.0Standard Deviation 3.6microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskWaitlistCongruent - Post-3.7Standard Deviation 4.1microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskTrainingIncongruent - Post-1.8Standard Deviation 3.7microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
Event-related Potentials Assessed During Child Attention Network Flanker TaskWaitlistIncongruent - Post-3.3Standard Deviation 4.5microvoltsClinicalTrials.gov
BRIEF Parent Survey (Global Executive Composite)TrainingGlobal Executive Composite-Pre66.55Standard Deviation 11.51scores on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
BRIEF Parent Survey (Global Executive Composite)WaitlistGlobal Executive Composite-Pre68.40Standard Deviation 8.61scores on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
BRIEF Parent Survey (Global Executive Composite)TrainingGlobal Executive Composite-Post65.85Standard Deviation 9.96scores on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
BRIEF Parent Survey (Global Executive Composite)WaitlistGlobal Executive Composite-Post67.77Standard Deviation 10.42scores on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov

Participant flow 6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource
Overall StudySTARTEDTraining35ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudySTARTEDWaitlist35ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTraining35ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDWaitlist33ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTraining0ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDWaitlist2ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource
Total, all-cause mortalityTraining035ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityWaitlist035ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsTraining035ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsWaitlist035ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsTraining035ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsWaitlist035ClinicalTrials.gov

Papers 1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35481725DERIVEDPubMed

Grants 1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
R00HD071966Electrophysiological Response to Executive Control Training in AutismFAJA, SUSANBOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALEUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT2014 to 2016NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons 2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Training vs Waitlist: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Training vs Waitlist: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests 6

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Eriksen Flanker TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stop-Signal TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
False Belief StoriesSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Go/No-Go TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)