ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02368886

Lower or Standard Dose Regorafenib in Treating Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

NCT02368886, Phase 2, Completed, Academic and Community Cancer Research United; results first posted 2019-07-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Lower or Standard Dose Regorafenib in Treating Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Trials, record NCT02368886. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02368886

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Lower or Standard Dose Regorafenib in Treating Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT number
NCT02368886
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
123 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Academic and Community Cancer Research United
Conditions
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Rectal Adenocarcinoma, Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7
Interventions
Clobetasol Propionate, Pharmacological Study, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Regorafenib
First posted
2015-02-23
Last updated
2025-06-18
Results first posted
2019-07-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Patients in Each Arm Who Complete 2 Cycles of Protocol Treatment and Initiate Cycle 3At 8 weeks
Fisher exact test will be used to detect a difference course 3 between arms (starting low dose \[pooled arm A1 and A2\] versus \[vs.\] standard dose \[pooled arm B1 and B2\]). The proportion of patients who complete 2 courses of protocol treatment and initiate course 3 will be computed by arm with its 95% confidence interval using exact method.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years
OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)
Time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, assessed up to 2 years
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments.
SecondaryTime to Progression (TTP)Time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed up to 2 years
TTP is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments.
SecondaryCumulative (Total) Dose of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two CyclesUp to 8 weeksWill be summarized with descriptive statistics and compared between regorafenib arms (A vs. B).
SecondaryDose Intensity of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles as Measured by the Percentage of Planned Dose ReceivedUp to 8 weeksDose intensity of regorafenib received by patients in the first two cycles as measured by the percentage (%) of planned dose received
SecondaryProportion of Patients Overall and Within Each Arm Experiencing Grade 3 or 4 Hand and Foot Syndrome (HFS)2 yearsWill be computed with 95% confidence intervals.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) (According to the HFS14 Total Score)8 weeks
Patients will be descriptively compared between treatment arms and between HFS treatment strategies (pre-emptive vs. reactive) according to self-reported outcomes given on the HFS14 questionnaire. Results from the course 1 and 2 HSF14 questionnaires will also be summarized descriptively as they relate to the pre-emptive versus reactive palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) strategies. Total HFS-14 score was calculated by summing the scores of all items and adjusting to 100 by applying a rule of three. Total scores have a range of 2-100, with the higher the score, the greater the QoL impairment.
SecondaryChanges in QOL (According to the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment [LASA] Questionnaire)Baseline to 8 weeksChanges in QOL (according to the LASA questionnaire as measured by the overall QOL question) from baseline will be compared between the treatment arms using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
OtherPharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters of Regorafenib Using Liquid Chromatography Mass SpectrometryBaseline, prior to treatment, days 7, 14, and 21 prior to treatment (course 1), and days 1 and 21 prior to treatment (course 2)
After quantitation, the average trough concentration, calculated from all available data, will be calculated. This average trough concentration will be correlated with toxicity and efficacy endpoints. Further descriptive characteristics of the pharmacokinetics will also be calculated, an example includes (but is not limited to) within-patient variability in the trough concentrations pharmacokinetic parameters will also be calculated, both overall and within courses, as a ratio of the maximum:minimum value.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Patients in Each Arm Who Complete 2 Cycles of Protocol Treatment and Initiate Cycle 3At 8 weeks
The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)).
proportion of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years
The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)).
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)
Time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, assessed up to 2 years
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Progression (TTP)Time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed up to 2 years
The data for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies (regorafenib dose escalation group (Arms A1 + A2) versus regorafenib standard dose group (Arms B1 + B2)).
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYCumulative (Total) Dose of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two CyclesUp to 8 weeks
The data for the pre-emptive \& reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies ((Arms A1 + A2) versus (Arms B1 + B2)). There are patients off-protocol treatment during cycle 1; therefore, we do not have cycle 2 dosing information for those patients who are off-protocol treatment during cycle 1.
mg/dayMEAN
SECONDARYDose Intensity of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles as Measured by the Percentage of Planned Dose ReceivedUp to 8 weeksThe data for the pre-emptive \& reactive treatment with clobatasol were pooled for the comparison of the two dosing strategies ((Arms A1 + A2) versus (Arms B1 + B2)).percentage of planned dose receivedMEDIAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Overall and Within Each Arm Experiencing Grade 3 or 4 Hand and Foot Syndrome (HFS)2 yearsproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QOL) (According to the HFS14 Total Score)8 weeksOnly patients that completed a post-baseline HFS14 assessment were included in analysis.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChanges in QOL (According to the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment [LASA] Questionnaire)Baseline to 8 weeksLASA overall score change from baselineMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters of Regorafenib Using Liquid Chromatography Mass SpectrometryBaseline, prior to treatment, days 7, 14, and 21 prior to treatment (course 1), and days 1 and 21 prior to treatment (course 2)

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Patients in Each Arm Who Complete 2 Cycles of Protocol Treatment and Initiate Cycle 3Regorafenib Dose Escalation Group0.4395% Confidence Interval 0.29 to 0.56proportion of patients
Proportion of Patients in Each Arm Who Complete 2 Cycles of Protocol Treatment and Initiate Cycle 3Regorafenib Standard Dose Group0.2695% Confidence Interval 0.15 to 0.37proportion of patients
Overall Survival (OS)Regorafenib Dose Escalation Group9.895% Confidence Interval 7.5 to 11.9months
Overall Survival (OS)Regorafenib Standard Dose Group6.095% Confidence Interval 4.9 to 10.2months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Regorafenib Dose Escalation Group2.895% Confidence Interval 2.0 to 5.0months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Regorafenib Standard Dose Group2.095% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 2.8months
Time to Progression (TTP)Regorafenib Dose Escalation Group2.895% Confidence Interval 1.9 to 5.7months
Time to Progression (TTP)Regorafenib Standard Dose Group2.095% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 3.3months
Cumulative (Total) Dose of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two CyclesRegorafenib Dose Escalation GroupCycle 191.8Standard Deviation 33.4mg/day
Cumulative (Total) Dose of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two CyclesRegorafenib Standard Dose GroupCycle 1133.1Standard Deviation 34.6mg/day

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)29
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)27
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy)34
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy)33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)26
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy)33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy)29
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)1

Adverse events596

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)4285
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)82615
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy)73310
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy)6308
otherBlood and lymphatic system disorders - Other, specifyBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)0280
otherBlood and lymphatic system disorders - Other, specifyBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)0260
otherBlood and lymphatic system disorders - Other, specifyBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy)0330
otherBlood and lymphatic system disorders - Other, specifyBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy)2303
otherThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)0280
otherThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)1265

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)028
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)326
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy)333
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy)230
Total, other adverse eventsArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)2828
Total, other adverse eventsArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)2426
Total, other adverse eventsArm B1 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Pre-emptive Strategy)3133
Total, other adverse eventsArm B2 (Regorafenib Standard Dose + Reactive Strategy)3030
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A1 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Pre-emptive Strategy)428
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A2 (Regorafenib Dose Escalation + Reactive Strategy)1026

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
28712102DERIVEDPubMed
31262657DERIVEDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
P30CA015083Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center Support GrantWILLMAN, CHERYL LYNNMAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2025

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02368886

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02368886/results?page=2