ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02372409

Using MRI-Guided Laser Heat Ablation to Induce Disruption of the Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier to Enhance Delivery and Efficacy of Treatment of Pediatric Brain Tumors

NCT02372409, Phase 2, Terminated, Washington University School of Medicine; results first posted 2024-08-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Using MRI-Guided Laser Heat Ablation to Induce Disruption of the Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier to Enhance Delivery and Efficacy of Treatment of Pediatric Brain Tumors. Trials, record NCT02372409. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02372409

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Using MRI-Guided Laser Heat Ablation to Induce Disruption of the Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier to Enhance Delivery and Efficacy of Treatment of Pediatric Brain Tumors
NCT number
NCT02372409
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
6 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Conditions
Glioma, Pilocytic Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma, Mixed Oligoastrocytoma, Mixed Glioma, Oligodendroglioma, Optic Glioma, Astrocytoma
Interventions
MRI-guided laser ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide, Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI
First posted
2015-02-26
Last updated
2024-11-01
Results first posted
2024-08-09
Limitations and caveats
The protocol stated that participants were to be followed for 5 years from participant registration or until death, whichever occurred first. The original consent that the participants signed stated that they would only be followed for 12 months after MLA. Once this issue was discovered, participants were contacted to be reconsented to be followed for 5 years; however, not all participants were able to be reconsented and that is why the results are late.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryArm A Only: Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to 5 years from date of registration (median length of follow-up, full range 196 days-1801 days)PFS is followed from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first.
PrimaryArm A Only: Overall Survival (OS) as Measured by Number of Participants Alive at 5 YearsUp to 5 years from date of registration (median length of follow-up, full range 196 days-1801 days)
PrimaryArm B Only: Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)At 6 monthsPFS is followed from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first.
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusAt 1 year post-MLAScore ranges from 100% to 10%. A higher score indicates that the patient has a more normal quality of life.
SecondarySerum Biomarkers of Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption as Measured by Change in Neuron-specific Enolase (NSE)Up to 48 weeks post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm A) or up to 2 years post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm B)
* Arm A patients had blood drawn at the following time points: baseline, 3 days post-MLA, 2-4 weeks post-MLA, and every 12 weeks thereafter for 12 months post-MLA * Arm B patients had blood drawn at the following time points: baseline, 3 days post-MLA, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, and every 8 weeks for the first 2 years or until disease progression, whichever occurs first. * Neuron specific enolase is an enzyme involved in glycolysis, which is localized in neurons and axonal processes. Potentially, it escapes into the blood and CSF at the time of neural injury. Elevated serum NSE seemed to correlates with disruption in BBB following MLA and transient increase in BBB permeability.
SecondarySerum Biomarkers of Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption as Measured by Change in S100BUp to 48 weeks post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm A) or up to 2 years post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm B)
* Arm A patients had blood drawn at the following time points: baseline, 3 days post-MLA, 2-4 weeks post-MLA, and every 12 weeks thereafter for 12 months post-MLA * Arm B patients had blood drawn at the following time points: baseline, 3 days post-MLA, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, and every 8 weeks for the first 2 years or until disease progression, whichever occurs first. * S100b is a low-molecular-weight Calcium-binding protein primarily found in astrocytic glial cells of the CNS. It is secreted by astrocytes for neuroprotective and -trophic cellular functions in the CNS. Elevated serum values can be associated with temporal changes in BBB integrity following MLA.
SecondarySerum Biomarkers of Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption as Measured by Change in GFAPUp to 48 weeks post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm A) or up to 2 years post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm B)
* Arm A patients had blood drawn at the following time points: baseline, 3 days post-MLA, 2-4 weeks post-MLA, and every 12 weeks thereafter for 12 months post-MLA * Arm B patients had blood drawn at the following time points: baseline, 3 days post-MLA, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, and every 8 weeks for the first 2 years or until disease progression, whichever occurs first. * The glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a classic intermediate filament protein specific to astrocytes in the CNS. GFAP is characteristic of astrocyte- and neural stem cell-derived gliomas in CNS tumors and is used to identify malignancies of glial origin, such as astrocytomas and GBM. Serum GFAP values can be increased with temporal disruption of BBB post-MLA.
SecondaryCorrelation of MR Imaging With Peritumoral BBB Disruption1 year from MLA
The linear regression model will used to investigate the correlation between MR imaging and peritumoral BBB disruption. To account for correlation among the repeated measures from the same patient, the longitudinal data will be analyzed with the use of linear generalized estimating equation (GEE). Whether the average measurements differ at the multiple time points will be evaluated through GEE model. Least-square means at each time points will be presented and standard errors will be calculated within the use of the GEE sandwich method when accounting for within-patient correlation.
SecondaryPredictive Value of the Peritumoral Permeability Score for Patient Outcome as Measured by PFS6 months
Biomarkers with higher correlation coefficient (r approaching 1) will be given higher priority. A minimum r=0.5 is required for inclusion for further analysis and will be used as a peritumoral permeability score. This score will then be correlated with the patient outcome data (as measured by 6 month PFS rate) to determine whether it has a predictive value.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYArm A Only: Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to 5 years from date of registration (median length of follow-up, full range 196 days-1801 days)This outcome measure is for Arm A participants only.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYArm A Only: Overall Survival (OS) as Measured by Number of Participants Alive at 5 YearsUp to 5 years from date of registration (median length of follow-up, full range 196 days-1801 days)This outcome measure is for Arm A participants only.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYArm B Only: Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)At 6 monthsThis outcome measure is for Arm B participants only.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusAt 1 year post-MLAThis data was not collected on the patient from Arm B.score on a scaleNUMBER
SECONDARYSerum Biomarkers of Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption as Measured by Change in Neuron-specific Enolase (NSE)Up to 48 weeks post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm A) or up to 2 years post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm B)
The one participant in Arm B did not consent to any procedures past 12 months post-MLA. There are time points not included because either the NSE was not detected in the samples or the samples were not collected.
ng/mlNUMBER
SECONDARYSerum Biomarkers of Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption as Measured by Change in S100BUp to 48 weeks post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm A) or up to 2 years post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm B)
The one participant in Arm B did not consent to any procedures past 12 months post-MLA. There are time points not included because either the S100B was not detected in the samples or the samples were not collected.
pg/mlNUMBER
SECONDARYSerum Biomarkers of Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption as Measured by Change in GFAPUp to 48 weeks post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm A) or up to 2 years post MRI-guided laser heat ablation (Arm B)
The one participant in Arm B did not consent to any procedures past 12 months post-MLA. There are time points not included because either the GFAP was not detected in the samples or the samples were not collected.
ng/mlNUMBER
SECONDARYCorrelation of MR Imaging With Peritumoral BBB Disruption1 year from MLAData was not collected for this outcome measure.
SECONDARYPredictive Value of the Peritumoral Permeability Score for Patient Outcome as Measured by PFS6 monthsData was not collected for this outcome measure.

Results by group73

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Arm A Only: Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)4Participants
Arm A Only: Overall Survival (OS) as Measured by Number of Participants Alive at 5 YearsArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)5Participants
Arm B Only: Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)Arm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)0Participants
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusPatient 1: Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)Baseline90score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusPatient 2: Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)Baseline100score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusPatient 3: Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)Baseline80score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusPatient 4: Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)Baseline100score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusPatient 5: Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)Baseline100score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusPatient 1: Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)1 year post-MLA90score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Karnofsky or Lansky Performance StatusPatient 2: Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)1 year post-MLA100score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)5
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)1

Adverse events14

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFecal incontinenceGastrointestinal disordersArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)15
otherFecal incontinenceGastrointestinal disordersArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)15
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)15
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01
otherParesthesiaNervous system disordersArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)15
otherParesthesiaNervous system disordersArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01
otherMemory impairmentNervous system disordersArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)15
otherMemory impairmentNervous system disordersArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)05
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01
Total, other adverse eventsArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)55
Total, other adverse eventsArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation)05
Total, serious adverse eventsArm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide)01

Papers12

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
8656261BACKGROUNDPubMed
8699237BACKGROUNDPubMed
9470839BACKGROUNDPubMed
10602854BACKGROUNDPubMed
17032878BACKGROUNDPubMed
17691714BACKGROUNDPubMed
19257803BACKGROUNDPubMed
21082374BACKGROUNDPubMed
21720013BACKGROUNDPubMed
21869722BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 12

See all 12 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation) vs Arm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Arm A (MRI-guided Laser Ablation) vs Arm B (MRI-guided Laser Ablation, Doxorubicin, Etoposide): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02372409

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02372409/results?page=2